Pulmonary Artery Thrombosis in Trauma: Not as Deadly as Previously Thought.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jack Carlson, Upuli Pahalawatta, Madeleine Hinwood, Thomas Giles, Zsolt J Balogh
{"title":"Pulmonary Artery Thrombosis in Trauma: Not as Deadly as Previously Thought.","authors":"Jack Carlson, Upuli Pahalawatta, Madeleine Hinwood, Thomas Giles, Zsolt J Balogh","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-known morbid and potentially life-threatening complication of polytrauma. There is growing evidence to suggest that patients with trauma are suspected to be prone to in situ pulmonary artery thrombosis (PAT) as a consequence of trauma-induced coagulopathy and endotheliopathy in addition to the classic PE preceded by deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Whether PAT on admission requires attention or can be safely ignored is currently unknown. This study aims to characterize the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of PAT in all patients with trauma admitted via the trauma resuscitation bay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a 1-year retrospective study of patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center in 2019. All initial trauma scans were retrospectively reviewed by a radiologist to assess for the presence of any visible clots in the pulmonary vasculature on admission. PAT was defined as pulmonary clots identified on the initial trauma pan-scan, PE was defined as a pulmonary clot detected on CTPA performed for diagnosis of suspected PE. The primary outcome was the identification of a pulmonary clot. Secondary outcomes were mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), overall length of stay, number of days requiring ventilation, development of respiratory failure, multiple organ failure (MOF), and its association with polytrauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 597 patients admitted, 278 (46.6%) patients had CT chest with IV contrast during admission and were included in this study. 45/278 (16.2%) patients were identified to have pulmonary clots; 43 (15.5%) were PAT and 2 (0.7%) were PE. There was no significant difference in the patient population or ISS between groups. PAT was associated with higher AIS scores in the extremities (p = 0.004) and external (p = 0.006) body regions. PAT was also associated with shock on presentation with lower systolic (p = 0.004) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.015) and elevated lactate (p = 0.002). PAT was associated with the development of early respiratory failure (p = 0.004). There was no difference in ICU admission or ventilator requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study demonstrates that post-trauma PAT is frequently identified on initial trauma imaging and is associated with early respiratory failure, shock on presentation, and extremity trauma but not with injury severity, mortality or intensive care admission. This study will inform future prospective studies on power and design to identify predictors for adverse outcomes and potential causal relationships with the risk factors identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-known morbid and potentially life-threatening complication of polytrauma. There is growing evidence to suggest that patients with trauma are suspected to be prone to in situ pulmonary artery thrombosis (PAT) as a consequence of trauma-induced coagulopathy and endotheliopathy in addition to the classic PE preceded by deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Whether PAT on admission requires attention or can be safely ignored is currently unknown. This study aims to characterize the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of PAT in all patients with trauma admitted via the trauma resuscitation bay.

Methods: This study is a 1-year retrospective study of patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center in 2019. All initial trauma scans were retrospectively reviewed by a radiologist to assess for the presence of any visible clots in the pulmonary vasculature on admission. PAT was defined as pulmonary clots identified on the initial trauma pan-scan, PE was defined as a pulmonary clot detected on CTPA performed for diagnosis of suspected PE. The primary outcome was the identification of a pulmonary clot. Secondary outcomes were mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), overall length of stay, number of days requiring ventilation, development of respiratory failure, multiple organ failure (MOF), and its association with polytrauma.

Results: Of the 597 patients admitted, 278 (46.6%) patients had CT chest with IV contrast during admission and were included in this study. 45/278 (16.2%) patients were identified to have pulmonary clots; 43 (15.5%) were PAT and 2 (0.7%) were PE. There was no significant difference in the patient population or ISS between groups. PAT was associated with higher AIS scores in the extremities (p = 0.004) and external (p = 0.006) body regions. PAT was also associated with shock on presentation with lower systolic (p = 0.004) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.015) and elevated lactate (p = 0.002). PAT was associated with the development of early respiratory failure (p = 0.004). There was no difference in ICU admission or ventilator requirements.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that post-trauma PAT is frequently identified on initial trauma imaging and is associated with early respiratory failure, shock on presentation, and extremity trauma but not with injury severity, mortality or intensive care admission. This study will inform future prospective studies on power and design to identify predictors for adverse outcomes and potential causal relationships with the risk factors identified.

创伤中的肺动脉血栓:不像以前认为的那样致命。
背景:肺栓塞(PE)是一种众所周知的病态和潜在的危及生命的并发症。越来越多的证据表明,创伤患者除了在深静脉血栓形成(DVT)之前发生的典型PE外,还可能由于创伤引起的凝血功能障碍和内皮病变而容易发生原位肺动脉血栓形成(PAT)。入院时的PAT是否需要注意或可以安全地忽略目前尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨经创伤复苏室收治的所有创伤患者PAT的发生率、危险因素和临床结果。方法:本研究是对2019年在某一级创伤中心住院的患者进行为期1年的回顾性研究。所有最初的创伤扫描由放射科医生回顾性检查,以评估入院时肺血管中是否存在任何可见的凝块。PAT被定义为在初始创伤泛扫描中发现的肺凝块,PE被定义为在诊断疑似PE时通过CTPA检测到的肺凝块。主要结果是肺凝块的识别。次要结局是死亡率、在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间、总住院时间、需要通气的天数、呼吸衰竭的发展、多器官衰竭(MOF)及其与多发创伤的关系。结果:597例患者中,278例(46.6%)患者在入院时进行了CT胸部静脉造影,纳入本研究。278例患者中有45例(16.2%)存在肺血栓;PAT 43例(15.5%),PE 2例(0.7%)。两组患者群体和ISS无显著差异。PAT与四肢(p = 0.004)和身体外部(p = 0.006)较高的AIS评分相关。PAT还与出现较低收缩压(p = 0.004)和舒张压(p = 0.015)和乳酸升高(p = 0.002)时的休克有关。PAT与早期呼吸衰竭的发生相关(p = 0.004)。ICU入院和呼吸机要求无差异。结论:本研究表明,创伤后PAT经常在初始创伤成像中被发现,并与早期呼吸衰竭、出现时休克和四肢创伤有关,但与损伤严重程度、死亡率或重症监护住院无关。这项研究将为未来的前瞻性研究提供信息,以确定不良结果的预测因素以及与已确定的风险因素之间的潜在因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信