Documentation of Compounded GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in a Large Primary Care Dataset.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nathaniel Hendrix, Esther E Velásquez, Harry Pham, Andrew Bazemore
{"title":"Documentation of Compounded GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in a Large Primary Care Dataset.","authors":"Nathaniel Hendrix, Esther E Velásquez, Harry Pham, Andrew Bazemore","doi":"10.1002/pds.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Large telehealth companies and smaller aesthetic medicine providers used compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide to meet consumer demand for these drugs during their shortages. In this study, we estimate the documentation rate of compounded formulations of these drugs in the US primary care and characterize differences between users of compounded and brand-name formulations of these drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the American Family Cohort, a nationwide US database of electronic health records from primary care practices, spanning January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024. Patients with documented semaglutide and/or tirzepatide use were included. Brand-name drug prescriptions were identified from structured data; compounded formulation use was identified from clinical notes. Outcomes included the proportion of patients using compounded formulations and their characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 153 044 included patients (64.0% female, mean age 55.0 years), 8.2% used compounded formulations, which made up an increasing share of semaglutide and tirzepatide use over time. Users of compounded formulations had longer mean therapy durations (compounded only: 10.0 months vs. brand-name only: 7.8 months) and were more likely to be female, non-Hispanic White, nondiabetic, and to live in areas of lower socioeconomic deprivation compared to patients who used only brand-name drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Between January 2021 and December 2024, documentation of compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide use in US primary care settings appeared lower than surveys reporting that approximately 23% of patients using these medications received them from compounders. This suggests that many patients may access these medications outside of coordinated care.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>During drug shortages from 2022 to 2024, many patients turned to compounded formulations of popular weight-loss medications semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro/Zepbound) made by specialty pharmacies. We analyzed medical records from over 153 000 patients across the United States who used these medications to understand how often primary care doctors knew their patients were using compounded formulations. We found that only 8.3% of patients had documented use of compounded formulations in their medical records, far lower than previous surveys suggesting 23% of users get these medications from nontraditional sources like telehealth companies or aesthetic clinics. Patients using compounded formulations were more likely to be white, female, nondiabetic, and live in wealthier areas compared to those using brand-name versions. They also used the medications for longer periods. This gap between documented use and actual use suggests many patients are getting these medications outside their regular healthcare system, which could create safety concerns since doctors may not know about all the medications their patients are taking or be able to monitor for side effects properly.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 10","pages":"e70227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Large telehealth companies and smaller aesthetic medicine providers used compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide to meet consumer demand for these drugs during their shortages. In this study, we estimate the documentation rate of compounded formulations of these drugs in the US primary care and characterize differences between users of compounded and brand-name formulations of these drugs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the American Family Cohort, a nationwide US database of electronic health records from primary care practices, spanning January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024. Patients with documented semaglutide and/or tirzepatide use were included. Brand-name drug prescriptions were identified from structured data; compounded formulation use was identified from clinical notes. Outcomes included the proportion of patients using compounded formulations and their characteristics.

Results: Among 153 044 included patients (64.0% female, mean age 55.0 years), 8.2% used compounded formulations, which made up an increasing share of semaglutide and tirzepatide use over time. Users of compounded formulations had longer mean therapy durations (compounded only: 10.0 months vs. brand-name only: 7.8 months) and were more likely to be female, non-Hispanic White, nondiabetic, and to live in areas of lower socioeconomic deprivation compared to patients who used only brand-name drugs.

Conclusions: Between January 2021 and December 2024, documentation of compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide use in US primary care settings appeared lower than surveys reporting that approximately 23% of patients using these medications received them from compounders. This suggests that many patients may access these medications outside of coordinated care.

Plain language summary: During drug shortages from 2022 to 2024, many patients turned to compounded formulations of popular weight-loss medications semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro/Zepbound) made by specialty pharmacies. We analyzed medical records from over 153 000 patients across the United States who used these medications to understand how often primary care doctors knew their patients were using compounded formulations. We found that only 8.3% of patients had documented use of compounded formulations in their medical records, far lower than previous surveys suggesting 23% of users get these medications from nontraditional sources like telehealth companies or aesthetic clinics. Patients using compounded formulations were more likely to be white, female, nondiabetic, and live in wealthier areas compared to those using brand-name versions. They also used the medications for longer periods. This gap between documented use and actual use suggests many patients are getting these medications outside their regular healthcare system, which could create safety concerns since doctors may not know about all the medications their patients are taking or be able to monitor for side effects properly.

复方GLP-1受体激动剂在大型初级保健数据集中的记录。
目的:大型远程保健公司和较小的美容医学提供商使用复合西马鲁肽和替西帕肽来满足消费者在短缺期间对这些药物的需求。在这项研究中,我们估计了这些药物的复合制剂在美国初级保健的文件率,并描述了这些药物的复合制剂和品牌制剂的用户之间的差异。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用的数据来自美国家庭队列(American Family cohort),这是一个全国性的美国初级保健实践电子健康记录数据库,时间跨度为2021年1月1日至2024年12月31日。记录使用西马鲁肽和/或替西帕肽的患者被纳入研究。从结构化数据中识别品牌药物处方;从临床记录中确定了复合制剂的使用。结果包括使用复方制剂的患者比例及其特征。结果:153 044例纳入的患者中(女性占64.0%,平均年龄55.0岁),8.2%的患者使用复方制剂,随着时间的推移,使用西马鲁肽和替西帕肽的比例越来越大。复合制剂的使用者平均治疗持续时间更长(仅复合:10.0个月vs仅品牌:7.8个月),并且与仅使用品牌药物的患者相比,更可能是女性,非西班牙裔白人,非糖尿病患者,生活在社会经济剥夺程度较低的地区。结论:在2021年1月至2024年12月期间,美国初级保健机构使用复方西马鲁肽和替西帕肽的记录似乎低于调查报告,约23%的使用这些药物的患者从复方药物中获得这些药物。这表明许多患者可能在协调护理之外获得这些药物。在2022年至2024年的药物短缺期间,许多患者转向专业药房生产的常用减肥药西马鲁肽(Ozempic/Wegovy)和替西帕肽(Mounjaro/Zepbound)的复方制剂。我们分析了美国超过15.3万名使用这些药物的患者的医疗记录,以了解初级保健医生知道他们的患者使用复合配方的频率。我们发现,只有8.3%的患者在他们的医疗记录中记录了复合配方的使用,远低于之前的调查显示的23%的用户从远程医疗公司或美容诊所等非传统来源获得这些药物。与使用品牌产品的患者相比,使用复合配方产品的患者更有可能是白人、女性、非糖尿病患者,并且生活在较富裕的地区。他们使用药物的时间也更长。记录使用和实际使用之间的差距表明,许多患者在常规医疗系统之外服用这些药物,这可能会产生安全问题,因为医生可能不知道患者正在服用的所有药物,也无法正确监测副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信