Knowledge to Impact: From Conceptualizing to Mobilizing the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Steven Hall, Noelle Rohatinsky, June Gawdun, Leslie Macala, Jennifer White, Lorraine Holtslander,  Shelley Peacock
{"title":"Knowledge to Impact: From Conceptualizing to Mobilizing the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study","authors":"Steven Hall,&nbsp;Noelle Rohatinsky,&nbsp;June Gawdun,&nbsp;Leslie Macala,&nbsp;Jennifer White,&nbsp;Lorraine Holtslander,&nbsp; Shelley Peacock","doi":"10.1111/jep.70291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Given the rising number of older adults reliant on family and friend caregivers (i.e., those who provide informal care), the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study aimed to examine the experiences of these caregivers in Saskatchewan and identify unmet needs. This paper describes our knowledge translation and mobilization efforts of our study's findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Researchers partnered with the Saskatoon Council on Aging (SCOA) to conduct the study, recruiting 355 family and friend caregivers. We evaluated impacts across conceptualization, data collection and knowledge mobilization using the Knowledge Engagement Impact Assessment Toolkit to assess how effectively our study's design has the potential to impact policy and practice, which involved completing an Assessment Matrix (quantitative assessment) and Assessment Portrait (qualitative assessment). A stakeholder webinar served as the primary knowledge translation event.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>An Assessment Matrix revealed moderate impact scores for conceptualization and knowledge mobilization phases. However, the Assessment Portrait reflected collaboration, thorough policy alignment and outreach. Data collection and analysis scored lower. We reflected on this lower score in the Assessment Portrait as being due to fewer avenues for reciprocal engagement and capacity-building during this stage. Policy recommendations, formed in collaboration with SCOA, were presented at the webinar and called for expanded respite care and streamlined system navigation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>By systematically evaluating research activities, this study highlights the critical role of knowledge translation in shaping caregiver support. Findings reinforce the importance of early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration, user-friendly dissemination methods and targeted policy action. Employing a structured framework for measuring engagement impact can guide targeted interventions, ensuring that caregiver programming, legislative reforms and improved care quality align with evolving population needs and priorities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Given the rising number of older adults reliant on family and friend caregivers (i.e., those who provide informal care), the Saskatchewan Caregiver Experience Study aimed to examine the experiences of these caregivers in Saskatchewan and identify unmet needs. This paper describes our knowledge translation and mobilization efforts of our study's findings.

Methods

Researchers partnered with the Saskatoon Council on Aging (SCOA) to conduct the study, recruiting 355 family and friend caregivers. We evaluated impacts across conceptualization, data collection and knowledge mobilization using the Knowledge Engagement Impact Assessment Toolkit to assess how effectively our study's design has the potential to impact policy and practice, which involved completing an Assessment Matrix (quantitative assessment) and Assessment Portrait (qualitative assessment). A stakeholder webinar served as the primary knowledge translation event.

Findings

An Assessment Matrix revealed moderate impact scores for conceptualization and knowledge mobilization phases. However, the Assessment Portrait reflected collaboration, thorough policy alignment and outreach. Data collection and analysis scored lower. We reflected on this lower score in the Assessment Portrait as being due to fewer avenues for reciprocal engagement and capacity-building during this stage. Policy recommendations, formed in collaboration with SCOA, were presented at the webinar and called for expanded respite care and streamlined system navigation.

Conclusion

By systematically evaluating research activities, this study highlights the critical role of knowledge translation in shaping caregiver support. Findings reinforce the importance of early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration, user-friendly dissemination methods and targeted policy action. Employing a structured framework for measuring engagement impact can guide targeted interventions, ensuring that caregiver programming, legislative reforms and improved care quality align with evolving population needs and priorities.

Abstract Image

从知识到影响:从概念化到动员萨斯喀彻温省看护者经验研究。
考虑到越来越多的老年人依赖于家庭和朋友照顾者(即那些提供非正式照顾的人),萨斯喀彻温省照顾者体验研究旨在检查萨斯喀彻温省这些照顾者的经历,并确定未满足的需求。本文介绍了我们的研究成果的知识转化和动员工作。方法:研究人员与萨斯卡通老龄化委员会(SCOA)合作进行研究,招募了355名家庭和朋友照顾者。我们利用“知识参与影响评估工具包”对概念化、数据收集和知识动员等方面的影响进行了评估,以评估我们的研究设计对政策和实践的潜在影响,其中包括完成评估矩阵(定量评估)和评估画像(定性评估)。一个利益相关者网络研讨会作为主要的知识翻译活动。结果:评估矩阵显示概念化和知识动员阶段的中等影响得分。然而,评估画像反映了合作、彻底的政策协调和外联。数据收集和分析得分较低。我们认为,在评估画像中,这一较低的分数是由于在这一阶段,相互参与和能力建设的途径较少。在网络研讨会上提出了与SCOA合作形成的政策建议,并呼吁扩大临时护理和简化系统导航。结论:通过系统地评估研究活动,本研究强调了知识翻译在塑造照顾者支持方面的关键作用。调查结果强调了早期和持续的利益攸关方合作、用户友好的传播方法和有针对性的政策行动的重要性。采用结构化框架来衡量参与影响,可以指导有针对性的干预措施,确保护理人员规划、立法改革和改善的护理质量符合不断变化的人口需求和优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信