Assessing institutional capacities to demand and use nutrition data for decision-making in Nigeria's health sector: A mixed-methods study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Elyse Iruhiriye, Olutayo Adeyemi, Yetunde Akinmolayan, Padmini Vishwanath, Daniela Rodriguez, Rebecca Heidkamp
{"title":"Assessing institutional capacities to demand and use nutrition data for decision-making in Nigeria's health sector: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Elyse Iruhiriye, Olutayo Adeyemi, Yetunde Akinmolayan, Padmini Vishwanath, Daniela Rodriguez, Rebecca Heidkamp","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01387-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using data for policy design, program implementation and accountability is a priority among nutrition stakeholders in Nigeria. However, the capacities of decision-makers to use data are not well-defined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used mixed methods to assess the capacity of institutions within Nigeria's health sector to demand and use data for decision-making on nutrition policies and programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative scale capturing organizational and individual factors related to the capacity to demand and use data was administered to 92 nutrition stakeholders in Nigeria across federal government (n = 33), state government (n = 21) and local government areas (LGAs) (n = 29) and development partner organizations (n = 9). We compared scores across sub-groups. Key informant interviews (KIIs) with a subset of the federal (n = 13), state (n = 17), LGA (n = 30), and development partner (n = 11) respondents complemented the quantitative scale and were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean institutional capacity to demand and use data was 78.6 out of 100 [95% confidence interval (CI) 75.9, 81.3]. The mean organizational capacity score was 51.4 out of 60 (95% CI 49.9, 52.9); individual capacity was 27.2 out of 40 (95% CI 25.7, 28.7). Development partners (mean 85.7; 95% CI 78.9, 92.4) had the highest score, followed by state-level respondents (mean 82.3; 95% CI 76.9, 87.6), but differences were not significant. Both quantitative and qualitative results showed recognition and support for nutrition data demand and use but weak organizational mechanisms to ensure data use. Accessing available nutrition data was a challenge, especially for administrative data. Quantitative and qualitative results identified infrastructural and technological resource barriers for government respondents, especially at the LGA level, but not for development partners. Skills to synthesize and use nutrition data were also a challenge across respondent groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Government and non-government stakeholders in Nigeria's health sector recognize the importance of data for nutrition decision-making, but gaps remain in individual capacity, resources and data use processes. To strengthen data use for nutrition policy process, investments to address gaps are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01387-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Using data for policy design, program implementation and accountability is a priority among nutrition stakeholders in Nigeria. However, the capacities of decision-makers to use data are not well-defined.

Objective: This study used mixed methods to assess the capacity of institutions within Nigeria's health sector to demand and use data for decision-making on nutrition policies and programs.

Methods: A quantitative scale capturing organizational and individual factors related to the capacity to demand and use data was administered to 92 nutrition stakeholders in Nigeria across federal government (n = 33), state government (n = 21) and local government areas (LGAs) (n = 29) and development partner organizations (n = 9). We compared scores across sub-groups. Key informant interviews (KIIs) with a subset of the federal (n = 13), state (n = 17), LGA (n = 30), and development partner (n = 11) respondents complemented the quantitative scale and were analysed thematically.

Results: Mean institutional capacity to demand and use data was 78.6 out of 100 [95% confidence interval (CI) 75.9, 81.3]. The mean organizational capacity score was 51.4 out of 60 (95% CI 49.9, 52.9); individual capacity was 27.2 out of 40 (95% CI 25.7, 28.7). Development partners (mean 85.7; 95% CI 78.9, 92.4) had the highest score, followed by state-level respondents (mean 82.3; 95% CI 76.9, 87.6), but differences were not significant. Both quantitative and qualitative results showed recognition and support for nutrition data demand and use but weak organizational mechanisms to ensure data use. Accessing available nutrition data was a challenge, especially for administrative data. Quantitative and qualitative results identified infrastructural and technological resource barriers for government respondents, especially at the LGA level, but not for development partners. Skills to synthesize and use nutrition data were also a challenge across respondent groups.

Conclusions: Government and non-government stakeholders in Nigeria's health sector recognize the importance of data for nutrition decision-making, but gaps remain in individual capacity, resources and data use processes. To strengthen data use for nutrition policy process, investments to address gaps are needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估尼日利亚卫生部门决策所需和使用营养数据的机构能力:一项混合方法研究。
背景:将数据用于政策设计、项目实施和问责是尼日利亚营养利益相关者的优先事项。然而,决策者使用数据的能力并没有明确定义。目的:本研究采用混合方法评估尼日利亚卫生部门机构在营养政策和方案决策中要求和使用数据的能力。方法:对尼日利亚联邦政府(n = 33)、州政府(n = 21)、地方政府(lga) (n = 29)和发展伙伴组织(n = 9)的92名营养利益相关者实施定量量表,该量表捕获了与需求和使用数据能力相关的组织和个人因素。我们比较了各个子组的得分。与联邦(n = 13)、州(n = 17)、地方政府(n = 30)和发展合作伙伴(n = 11)受访者进行的关键信息访谈(KIIs)补充了定量量表,并进行了主题分析。结果:要求和使用数据的平均机构能力为78.6(满分100分)[95%置信区间(CI) 75.9, 81.3]。平均组织能力得分为51.4分(95% CI 49.9, 52.9);个人容量为27.2 / 40 (95% CI 25.7, 28.7)。发展伙伴(平均85.7分;95% CI 78.9, 92.4分)得分最高,其次是州级受访者(平均82.3分;95% CI 76.9, 87.6分),但差异不显著。定量和定性结果均显示对营养数据需求和使用的认可和支持,但确保数据使用的组织机制薄弱。获取现有的营养数据是一项挑战,特别是对于行政数据。定量和定性结果确定了政府答复者的基础设施和技术资源障碍,特别是在地方政府一级,但没有确定发展伙伴的障碍。综合和使用营养数据的技能也是受访者群体面临的挑战。结论:尼日利亚卫生部门的政府和非政府利益攸关方认识到数据对营养决策的重要性,但在个人能力、资源和数据使用过程方面仍然存在差距。为了加强数据在营养政策过程中的使用,需要投资以弥补差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信