Prognostic impact of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: comment and validation from a small real-world cohort.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kaiyuan Cen, Juanyu Lin, Shixiang Yu
{"title":"Prognostic impact of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: comment and validation from a small real-world cohort.","authors":"Kaiyuan Cen, Juanyu Lin, Shixiang Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04124-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Right ventricular dysfunction is a known predictor of early mortality after TAVI. TAPSE is a practical echocardiographic index of RV function. To assess whether baseline TAPSE predicts 30-day mortality after TAVI in a real-world cohort. Among 21 patients, those with TAPSE < 17 mm had higher 30-day mortality (28.6% vs 7.1%). PASP was higher in the low-TAPSE group (45 ± 12 vs 32 ± 10 mmHg; p = 0.03). Non-survivors had a lower TAPSE/PASP ratio than survivors (median 0.351 [IQR 0.288-0.419] vs 0.607 [0.406-0.667]; exact p = 0.078), in line with a trend toward worse RV-pulmonary arterial coupling. A multivariable model including TAPSE, age, and EuroSCORE II showed apparent perfect discrimination (AUC = 1.00) within this very small dataset (3 events), likely overestimating true performance due to overfitting. TAPSE may serve as a simple, effective tool for early risk stratification in TAVI candidates as an adjunct to-rather than a replacement for-comprehensive geriatric/frailty assessment and established risk scores; estimates are unstable due to the small sample and event count.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04124-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Right ventricular dysfunction is a known predictor of early mortality after TAVI. TAPSE is a practical echocardiographic index of RV function. To assess whether baseline TAPSE predicts 30-day mortality after TAVI in a real-world cohort. Among 21 patients, those with TAPSE < 17 mm had higher 30-day mortality (28.6% vs 7.1%). PASP was higher in the low-TAPSE group (45 ± 12 vs 32 ± 10 mmHg; p = 0.03). Non-survivors had a lower TAPSE/PASP ratio than survivors (median 0.351 [IQR 0.288-0.419] vs 0.607 [0.406-0.667]; exact p = 0.078), in line with a trend toward worse RV-pulmonary arterial coupling. A multivariable model including TAPSE, age, and EuroSCORE II showed apparent perfect discrimination (AUC = 1.00) within this very small dataset (3 events), likely overestimating true performance due to overfitting. TAPSE may serve as a simple, effective tool for early risk stratification in TAVI candidates as an adjunct to-rather than a replacement for-comprehensive geriatric/frailty assessment and established risk scores; estimates are unstable due to the small sample and event count.

经导管主动脉瓣置入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者右心室功能障碍对预后的影响:来自真实世界小队列的评论和验证
右室功能障碍是TAVI术后早期死亡的已知预测因子。TAPSE是一种实用的心室功能超声心动图指标。评估基线TAPSE是否能预测TAVI后30天的死亡率。21例患者中,TAPSE患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信