Complications in Central Venous Access Devices in Paediatric Cancer Care: A Global Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Sabrina de Souza, Mari D Takashima, Areum Hyun, Victoria Gibson, Thiago Lopes Silva, Patricia Kuerten Rocha, Siriporn Vetcho, Sophie C H Wen, Amanda J Ullman
{"title":"Complications in Central Venous Access Devices in Paediatric Cancer Care: A Global Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Sabrina de Souza, Mari D Takashima, Areum Hyun, Victoria Gibson, Thiago Lopes Silva, Patricia Kuerten Rocha, Siriporn Vetcho, Sophie C H Wen, Amanda J Ullman","doi":"10.1111/ejh.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine global practices for identifying and managing central venous access device (CVAD) complications-catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI), thrombosis, and occlusion-in paediatric cancer care, comparing patterns between high- and other-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional international survey was conducted from 2022 to 2023 and analysed 2024 to 2025. Clinicians involved in paediatric CVAD cancer care were recruited through global networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 respondents from 38 countries completed the complication section, including 102 (63.4%) from high-income and 59 (36.6%) from other-income countries (lower- and upper-middle income). For CABSI, blood culture was the main diagnostic method (122 [75.8%]; high-income: 87 [85.3%], other-income: 35 [59.3%]). Differential time to positivity was more often reported in other-income settings (33 [55.9%] vs. 35 [34.3%]), who also more frequently initiated antibiotics based on nonspecific or immediate criteria. CABSI treatment varied, with intravenous antibiotics (68 [60.7%]) and catheter removal (47 [42.0%]) most reported. For thrombosis, anticoagulation before line removal was common (88 [54.7%]), and alteplase use was higher in high-income countries (76 [74.5%] vs. 19 [32.2%]). Thrombolytic agents were the most reported treatment for occlusion (103 [64.0%]), especially in high-income countries (77 [75.5%] vs. 26 [44.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CVAD complication management varies by country income level, highlighting the need for context-adapted guidelines, training, and equitable access to key resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine global practices for identifying and managing central venous access device (CVAD) complications-catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI), thrombosis, and occlusion-in paediatric cancer care, comparing patterns between high- and other-income countries.

Methods: A cross-sectional international survey was conducted from 2022 to 2023 and analysed 2024 to 2025. Clinicians involved in paediatric CVAD cancer care were recruited through global networks.

Results: A total of 161 respondents from 38 countries completed the complication section, including 102 (63.4%) from high-income and 59 (36.6%) from other-income countries (lower- and upper-middle income). For CABSI, blood culture was the main diagnostic method (122 [75.8%]; high-income: 87 [85.3%], other-income: 35 [59.3%]). Differential time to positivity was more often reported in other-income settings (33 [55.9%] vs. 35 [34.3%]), who also more frequently initiated antibiotics based on nonspecific or immediate criteria. CABSI treatment varied, with intravenous antibiotics (68 [60.7%]) and catheter removal (47 [42.0%]) most reported. For thrombosis, anticoagulation before line removal was common (88 [54.7%]), and alteplase use was higher in high-income countries (76 [74.5%] vs. 19 [32.2%]). Thrombolytic agents were the most reported treatment for occlusion (103 [64.0%]), especially in high-income countries (77 [75.5%] vs. 26 [44.1%]).

Conclusions: CVAD complication management varies by country income level, highlighting the need for context-adapted guidelines, training, and equitable access to key resources.

中心静脉通路装置在儿童癌症治疗中的并发症:一项全球横断面调查。
目的:研究识别和管理中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)并发症——导管相关血流感染(CABSI)、血栓形成和闭塞——在儿科癌症护理中的全球做法,比较高收入国家和其他收入国家之间的模式。方法:从2022年到2023年进行横断面国际调查,并对2024年到2025年进行分析。参与儿科心血管疾病癌症治疗的临床医生是通过全球网络招募的。结果:来自38个国家的161名受访者完成了并发症部分,其中高收入国家102名(63.4%),其他收入国家59名(36.6%)(低收入和中上收入)。对于CABSI,血培养是主要的诊断方法(122例[75.8%];高收入:87例[85.3%],其他收入:35例[59.3%])。在其他收入环境中(33例[55.9%]vs. 35例[34.3%]),在非特异性或即时标准的基础上使用抗生素的情况也更多。CABSI的治疗方法多种多样,以静脉注射抗生素(68例[60.7%])和拔管(47例[42.0%])报道最多。对于血栓形成,取线前抗凝是常见的(88例[54.7%]),高收入国家阿替普酶的使用率更高(76例[74.5%]对19例[32.2%])。溶栓药物是报道最多的闭塞治疗方法(103例[64.0%]),特别是在高收入国家(77例[75.5%]对26例[44.1%])。结论:心血管疾病并发症的管理因国家收入水平而异,强调需要制定适应具体情况的指南、培训和公平获取关键资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信