Gaps in the global health research landscape for mpox: an analysis of research activities and existing evidence.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rodrigo Furst, Emilia Antonio, Marieke de Swart, Isabel Foster, Johannes Paolo Cerrado, Zaharat Kadri-Alabi, Susan Khader Ibrahim, Lauren Ashley, Duduzile Ndwandwe, Louise Sigfrid, Alice Norton
{"title":"Gaps in the global health research landscape for mpox: an analysis of research activities and existing evidence.","authors":"Rodrigo Furst, Emilia Antonio, Marieke de Swart, Isabel Foster, Johannes Paolo Cerrado, Zaharat Kadri-Alabi, Susan Khader Ibrahim, Lauren Ashley, Duduzile Ndwandwe, Louise Sigfrid, Alice Norton","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04350-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since December 2022, human cases of mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have risen at unprecedented rates. We identified a need for systematic mapping of the active research landscape and evidence, assessing their alignment with both local and global research priorities, to inform urgently needed research investments to support response efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mapping review of global research funding and international clinical trial registries and established a systematic rapid research needs appraisals platform to identify existing evidence gaps on mpox research. We analysed the alignment of these to established research categories and both local and globally identified mpox-specific research priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 124 ongoing mpox research grants, 79 registered trials and 415 published studies. Most grants (85.0%, n = 105/124), clinical trials (49.3%, n = 39/79) and primary studies (57.7%, n = 205/355) were conducted in high-income countries, with most evidence published in response to the 2022 clade II global mpox outbreaks. Research funding has been focussed on vaccine and therapeutic pre-clinical development. Key gaps remain in both ongoing research and evidence relating to clinical characterisation among populations at risk, clinical trials on effective medical countermeasures specific to clade I, social sciences, health systems research, and healthcare and community protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight persistent research gaps related to mpox clade Ib, particularly the limited knowledge on its characteristics and a lack of ongoing efforts to develop effective medical countermeasures, posing a risk to control efforts. Aligning research and investments to locally and globally identified research priorities and evidence gaps will help support national, regional and international responses to prevent transmission and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"522"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04350-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since December 2022, human cases of mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) have risen at unprecedented rates. We identified a need for systematic mapping of the active research landscape and evidence, assessing their alignment with both local and global research priorities, to inform urgently needed research investments to support response efforts.

Methods: We conducted a mapping review of global research funding and international clinical trial registries and established a systematic rapid research needs appraisals platform to identify existing evidence gaps on mpox research. We analysed the alignment of these to established research categories and both local and globally identified mpox-specific research priorities.

Results: We identified 124 ongoing mpox research grants, 79 registered trials and 415 published studies. Most grants (85.0%, n = 105/124), clinical trials (49.3%, n = 39/79) and primary studies (57.7%, n = 205/355) were conducted in high-income countries, with most evidence published in response to the 2022 clade II global mpox outbreaks. Research funding has been focussed on vaccine and therapeutic pre-clinical development. Key gaps remain in both ongoing research and evidence relating to clinical characterisation among populations at risk, clinical trials on effective medical countermeasures specific to clade I, social sciences, health systems research, and healthcare and community protection.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight persistent research gaps related to mpox clade Ib, particularly the limited knowledge on its characteristics and a lack of ongoing efforts to develop effective medical countermeasures, posing a risk to control efforts. Aligning research and investments to locally and globally identified research priorities and evidence gaps will help support national, regional and international responses to prevent transmission and improve outcomes.

m痘全球卫生研究领域的差距:对研究活动和现有证据的分析
背景:自2022年12月以来,刚果民主共和国人间麻疹病例以前所未有的速度上升。我们确定需要系统地绘制活跃的研究景观和证据,评估它们与当地和全球研究重点的一致性,以便为迫切需要的研究投资提供信息,以支持应对工作。方法:我们对全球研究经费和国际临床试验注册进行了制图回顾,并建立了一个系统的快速研究需求评估平台,以确定m痘研究的现有证据差距。我们分析了这些与既定研究类别的一致性,以及本地和全球确定的针对mpox的研究重点。结果:我们确定了124项正在进行的mpox研究资助,79项注册试验和415项已发表的研究。大多数拨款(85.0%,n = 105/124)、临床试验(49.3%,n = 39/79)和初步研究(57.7%,n = 205/355)是在高收入国家进行的,其中发表的大多数证据是针对2022年II级全球痘暴发的。研究经费主要用于疫苗和治疗性临床前开发。在与高危人群的临床特征、针对一级进化支的有效医疗对策的临床试验、社会科学、卫生系统研究以及卫生保健和社区保护有关的正在进行的研究和证据方面仍存在主要差距。结论:我们的研究结果突出了与m痘分支Ib相关的持续研究空白,特别是对其特征的有限了解和缺乏开发有效医疗对策的持续努力,这给控制工作带来了风险。使研究和投资与地方和全球确定的研究重点和证据差距保持一致,将有助于支持国家、区域和国际应对措施,以预防传播并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信