Exploring Barriers to Use of Train of Four Peripheral Nerve Monitoring in the ICU.

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000569
Khrizna Belardo Chong, Jennifer Harris, Angela Klinkhamer, Heather Fojas, Maren Attanasio, Tran Chau, Kwanghwi Park, Priscila S Kovacs, Judy E Davidson
{"title":"Exploring Barriers to Use of Train of Four Peripheral Nerve Monitoring in the ICU.","authors":"Khrizna Belardo Chong, Jennifer Harris, Angela Klinkhamer, Heather Fojas, Maren Attanasio, Tran Chau, Kwanghwi Park, Priscila S Kovacs, Judy E Davidson","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) Train of Four (TOF) monitoring is indicated for use in patients receiving neuromuscular blockade (NMBA). Nurses are responsible for TOF monitoring, yet little is known about barriers to use. NMBA guidelines recommend quantitative electromyography (Q-EMG) monitoring not yet used in ICUs. The aim of this study was to explore ICU nurses' experiences with TOF and perceived barriers to use. This qualitative study explored ICU nurses' perspectives and perceived barriers to use of TOF. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Thirty nurses from 6 ICUs participated. Two main themes emerged: (1) lack of confidence in visually monitoring TOF and (2) inconsistent procedures. Lack of confidence was related to device concerns, difficulty visualizing twitches, absence of baseline data, TOF not aligned with clinical presentation, and provider preference for ventilator synchrony vs. TOF. Barriers to skin access were reported. Objective measurement of Q-EMG twitch ratio may improve confidence. Nerve stimulation reported as minor discomfort (mean = 2, scale 0-10). Current barriers have led to misuse or disuse. Use of Q-EMG TOF may increase confidence in TOF monitoring and overcome current barriers. Further research is indicated to test Q-EMG in the ICU setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"48 4","pages":"345-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) Train of Four (TOF) monitoring is indicated for use in patients receiving neuromuscular blockade (NMBA). Nurses are responsible for TOF monitoring, yet little is known about barriers to use. NMBA guidelines recommend quantitative electromyography (Q-EMG) monitoring not yet used in ICUs. The aim of this study was to explore ICU nurses' experiences with TOF and perceived barriers to use. This qualitative study explored ICU nurses' perspectives and perceived barriers to use of TOF. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Thirty nurses from 6 ICUs participated. Two main themes emerged: (1) lack of confidence in visually monitoring TOF and (2) inconsistent procedures. Lack of confidence was related to device concerns, difficulty visualizing twitches, absence of baseline data, TOF not aligned with clinical presentation, and provider preference for ventilator synchrony vs. TOF. Barriers to skin access were reported. Objective measurement of Q-EMG twitch ratio may improve confidence. Nerve stimulation reported as minor discomfort (mean = 2, scale 0-10). Current barriers have led to misuse or disuse. Use of Q-EMG TOF may increase confidence in TOF monitoring and overcome current barriers. Further research is indicated to test Q-EMG in the ICU setting.

探讨在ICU应用四种周围神经监护的障碍。
周围神经刺激(PNS)四列(TOF)监测适用于接受神经肌肉阻断(NMBA)的患者。护士负责TOF的监测,但对使用障碍知之甚少。NMBA指南推荐定量肌电图(Q-EMG)监测,但尚未在icu中使用。本研究的目的是探讨ICU护士使用TOF的经验和使用的感知障碍。本定性研究探讨了ICU护士的观点和使用TOF的感知障碍。采用主题分析对半结构化访谈进行分析。来自6个icu的30名护士参与。出现了两个主要主题:(1)对目视监测TOF缺乏信心;(2)程序不一致。缺乏信心与设备问题、难以观察抽搐、缺乏基线数据、TOF与临床表现不一致以及提供者对呼吸机同步与TOF的偏好有关。有皮肤接触障碍的报道。客观测量Q-EMG抽动比可提高信心。神经刺激报告为轻微不适(平均= 2,评分0-10)。目前的障碍导致了误用或废弃。使用Q-EMG TOF可以增加对TOF监测的信心,并克服目前的障碍。建议进一步研究在ICU环境下测试Q-EMG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信