Mental health literacy and perinatal mental health experiences among healthcare professionals in the United Arab Emirates: a qualitative study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rouwida ElKhalil, Rasha Bayoumi, Preetha Karuveetil, Mohamad AlMekkawi, Luai A Ahmed, Rami H Al-Rifai, Emad Masuadi, Iffat Elbarazi
{"title":"Mental health literacy and perinatal mental health experiences among healthcare professionals in the United Arab Emirates: a qualitative study.","authors":"Rouwida ElKhalil, Rasha Bayoumi, Preetha Karuveetil, Mohamad AlMekkawi, Luai A Ahmed, Rami H Al-Rifai, Emad Masuadi, Iffat Elbarazi","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the mental health literacy of perinatal healthcare professionals in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and analysed how their knowledge, attitudes and confidence impact their clinical practices in addressing perinatal mental health disorders.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study with a descriptive phenomenological design. Data were collected via semi-structured individual interviews and focus group discussions. The data were analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted in Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Al Ain in the UAE. Participants were recruited from various healthcare facilities and professional educational events.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The participants consisted of perinatal healthcare professionals from seven disciplines, including lactation consultants, midwives, nurses, obstetricians, paediatricians, family medicine practitioners and psychiatrists/psychologists. All participants were required to be actively involved in providing care to perinatal patients and to have a minimum of one year of clinical experience. The study included three focus group discussions and 28 semistructured individual interviews, culminating in a sample of 43 participants for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes emerged: (1) Knowledge and awareness, highlighting variable understanding of perinatal mental health and reliance on instinct over formal screening; (2) Navigating professional roles and realities, showing empathy and willingness to support patients, yet role ambiguity, low confidence and societal stigma influence perinatal healthcare professionals' responses and care practices and (3) Strengthening support systems and resources, where participants called for improved training, clear policies and psychosocial resources to overcome institutional and educational gaps and to enhance perinatal mental healthcare and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals gaps in mental health literacy and institutional support that hinder the delivery of effective perinatal mental healthcare. Strengthening provider training, implementing standardised screening and referral pathways, and promoting culturally sensitive, multidisciplinary approaches are essential. Such interventions can enhance early detection and improve outcomes for mothers and infants. Further research should focus on developing and evaluating the efficacy of such interventions to enhance early detection and improve outcomes for mothers and infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 9","pages":"e107176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the mental health literacy of perinatal healthcare professionals in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and analysed how their knowledge, attitudes and confidence impact their clinical practices in addressing perinatal mental health disorders.

Design: A qualitative study with a descriptive phenomenological design. Data were collected via semi-structured individual interviews and focus group discussions. The data were analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis.

Setting: The study was conducted in Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Al Ain in the UAE. Participants were recruited from various healthcare facilities and professional educational events.

Participants: The participants consisted of perinatal healthcare professionals from seven disciplines, including lactation consultants, midwives, nurses, obstetricians, paediatricians, family medicine practitioners and psychiatrists/psychologists. All participants were required to be actively involved in providing care to perinatal patients and to have a minimum of one year of clinical experience. The study included three focus group discussions and 28 semistructured individual interviews, culminating in a sample of 43 participants for analysis.

Results: Three key themes emerged: (1) Knowledge and awareness, highlighting variable understanding of perinatal mental health and reliance on instinct over formal screening; (2) Navigating professional roles and realities, showing empathy and willingness to support patients, yet role ambiguity, low confidence and societal stigma influence perinatal healthcare professionals' responses and care practices and (3) Strengthening support systems and resources, where participants called for improved training, clear policies and psychosocial resources to overcome institutional and educational gaps and to enhance perinatal mental healthcare and patient outcomes.

Conclusions: The study reveals gaps in mental health literacy and institutional support that hinder the delivery of effective perinatal mental healthcare. Strengthening provider training, implementing standardised screening and referral pathways, and promoting culturally sensitive, multidisciplinary approaches are essential. Such interventions can enhance early detection and improve outcomes for mothers and infants. Further research should focus on developing and evaluating the efficacy of such interventions to enhance early detection and improve outcomes for mothers and infants.

阿拉伯联合酋长国保健专业人员的心理健康素养和围产期心理健康经验:一项定性研究。
目的:本研究考察了阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)围产期保健专业人员的心理健康素养,并分析了他们的知识、态度和信心如何影响他们在处理围产期心理健康障碍方面的临床实践。设计:采用描述性现象学设计的定性研究。数据通过半结构化的个人访谈和焦点小组讨论收集。采用Braun和Clarke的六步主题分析法对数据进行归纳分析。环境:研究在阿联酋的阿布扎比、迪拜和艾因进行。参与者是从不同的医疗机构和专业教育活动中招募的。参与者:参与者包括来自七个学科的围产期保健专业人员,包括哺乳顾问、助产士、护士、产科医生、儿科医生、家庭医生和精神科医生/心理学家。所有参与者都被要求积极参与为围产期患者提供护理,并至少有一年的临床经验。该研究包括三次焦点小组讨论和28次半结构化的个人访谈,最终以43名参与者的样本进行分析。结果:出现了三个关键主题:(1)知识和意识,突出了对围产期心理健康的不同理解和对本能的依赖而不是正式筛查;(2)定位专业角色和现实,表现出同情和支持患者的意愿,但角色模糊,低信心和社会污名影响围产期保健专业人员的反应和护理实践;(3)加强支持系统和资源,与会者呼吁改进培训,明确政策和社会心理资源,以克服体制和教育差距,增强围产期心理保健和患者预后。结论:该研究揭示了心理健康素养和制度支持的差距,阻碍了有效的围产期心理保健的提供。加强提供者培训,实施标准化的筛查和转诊途径,以及促进对文化敏感的多学科方法至关重要。这类干预措施可以加强早期发现,改善母亲和婴儿的预后。进一步的研究应侧重于发展和评估这些干预措施的效力,以加强早期发现和改善母亲和婴儿的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信