RIMA-SVG versus Ao-SVG in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority and single-centre trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ran Wei, Maoxun Huang, Nan Jiang, Rong Zhang, Tianqi He, Cuilin Zhu, Weitie Wang, Hulin Piao, Shi Yu, Zhicheng Zhu, Tiance Wang, Kexiang Liu
{"title":"RIMA-SVG versus Ao-SVG in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority and single-centre trial.","authors":"Ran Wei, Maoxun Huang, Nan Jiang, Rong Zhang, Tianqi He, Cuilin Zhu, Weitie Wang, Hulin Piao, Shi Yu, Zhicheng Zhu, Tiance Wang, Kexiang Liu","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard treatment for coronary artery disease, particularly in patients with multivessel disease. Connecting the saphenous vein graft (SVG) to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) instead of the aorta has been proposed as an alternative approach to minimise aortic manipulation and potentially improve graft patency. This study aims to determine whether the RIMA-SVG technique is non-inferior to the conventional Aorta (Ao)-SVG approach in terms of 1-year graft patency, while also comparing perioperative complications and short-term clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This non-inferiority, single-centre, prospective, double-blind, randomised clinical trial will enrol 300 patients undergoing CABG. Participants will be randomised into two surgical groups (RIMA-SVG vs Ao-SVG). The primary outcome is the 1-year SVG patency rate, assessed using coronary CT angiography. Secondary outcomes include perioperative complications, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and surgical site infections occurring during hospitalisation and up to 1 year postoperatively. Randomisation will be computer-generated, and all procedures will be performed by experienced surgeons. Patients will be followed up 12 months post-surgery. Non-inferiority will be established if the upper bound of the one-sided 97.5% CI for the difference in graft occlusion rates is less than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University (No. 460) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06787651). All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. To ensure data integrity and minimise bias, randomisation details will be concealed from researchers until surgery, and data analysts will remain blinded to group assignments. The findings will be disseminated through academic journals and conference presentations to promote knowledge sharing and clinical application in the field of cardiovascular surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06787651.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 9","pages":"e104578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a standard treatment for coronary artery disease, particularly in patients with multivessel disease. Connecting the saphenous vein graft (SVG) to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) instead of the aorta has been proposed as an alternative approach to minimise aortic manipulation and potentially improve graft patency. This study aims to determine whether the RIMA-SVG technique is non-inferior to the conventional Aorta (Ao)-SVG approach in terms of 1-year graft patency, while also comparing perioperative complications and short-term clinical outcomes.

Methods and analysis: This non-inferiority, single-centre, prospective, double-blind, randomised clinical trial will enrol 300 patients undergoing CABG. Participants will be randomised into two surgical groups (RIMA-SVG vs Ao-SVG). The primary outcome is the 1-year SVG patency rate, assessed using coronary CT angiography. Secondary outcomes include perioperative complications, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and surgical site infections occurring during hospitalisation and up to 1 year postoperatively. Randomisation will be computer-generated, and all procedures will be performed by experienced surgeons. Patients will be followed up 12 months post-surgery. Non-inferiority will be established if the upper bound of the one-sided 97.5% CI for the difference in graft occlusion rates is less than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10%.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University (No. 460) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06787651). All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. To ensure data integrity and minimise bias, randomisation details will be concealed from researchers until surgery, and data analysts will remain blinded to group assignments. The findings will be disseminated through academic journals and conference presentations to promote knowledge sharing and clinical application in the field of cardiovascular surgery.

Trial registration number: NCT06787651.

RIMA-SVG与Ao-SVG在冠状动脉搭桥术中的对比:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、非劣效性和单中心试验方案
简介:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是冠状动脉疾病的标准治疗方法,特别是多血管疾病患者。将隐静脉移植物(SVG)连接到右乳腺内动脉(RIMA)而不是主动脉,已被提出作为最小化主动脉操作并可能改善移植物通畅的替代方法。本研究旨在确定RIMA-SVG技术在1年的移植物通畅性方面是否不逊色于传统主动脉(Ao)-SVG入路,同时比较围手术期并发症和短期临床结果。方法和分析:这项非劣效性、单中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验将招募300名接受CABG的患者。参与者将随机分为两个手术组(RIMA-SVG vs Ao-SVG)。主要结果是1年SVG通畅率,通过冠状动脉CT血管造影评估。次要结局包括围手术期并发症、全因死亡率、主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)以及住院期间和术后1年内发生的手术部位感染。随机化将由计算机生成,所有程序将由经验丰富的外科医生执行。术后随访12个月。如果移植物闭塞率差异的单侧97.5% CI的上界小于预先规定的10%的非劣效性界限,则建立非劣效性。伦理与传播:本研究已获得吉林大学第二医院伦理委员会(第460号)批准,并在ClinicalTrials.gov网站注册(NCT06787651)。所有参与者将在报名前提供书面知情同意书。为了确保数据的完整性和最大限度地减少偏差,随机化的细节将在手术前对研究人员隐藏,数据分析师将对分组分配保持盲视。研究结果将通过学术期刊和会议报告进行传播,以促进心血管外科领域的知识共享和临床应用。试验注册号:NCT06787651。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信