A computational investigation into the role of tRNAs encoded by Shigella phage Sf14.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Nykki D Ross, Sarah M Doore
{"title":"A computational investigation into the role of tRNAs encoded by Shigella phage Sf14.","authors":"Nykki D Ross, Sarah M Doore","doi":"10.1186/s12864-025-11998-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacteriophage Sf14 infects Shigella flexneri, a major foodborne pathogen that causes shigellosis outbreaks primarily in developing nations. It is a Moogle-like myovirus that encodes 26 tRNAs recognizing 19 different amino acids. The presence of tRNAs in phage genomes have been known for decades, but their functions are still poorly understood and appear to vary between species. This work uses computational methods to test several existing hypotheses regarding phage-encoded tRNAs in the context of Sf14 infection. Analyses of codon usage, tRNA adaptation, and tRNA mutation patterns were performed to test four hypotheses of phage tRNA function: codon usage bias, host range expansion, an all-destructive infection phenotype, and escape from host nucleases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from these analyses excluded hypotheses of host range expansion and escape from host anticodon nucleases. Instead, results suggest phage-encoded tRNAs are likely used during late stages of infection, primarily increasing expression of structural genes. While there are significant differences in codon usage bias between Sf14 gene groups and S. flexneri 2457T, translational efficiency of Sf14 late genes (as estimated by tRNA adaptation index) is highest when using the phage tRNA pool only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most likely hypothesis explaining the presence of tRNAs in the Sf14 genome is the possession of an all-destructive infection phenotype, where genes encoding host tRNAs are degraded along with the genome and translation relies heavily or exclusively on the phage tRNAs. The differences in codon usage also suggest phage-encoded tRNAs specifically affect the production of late gene products.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":"858"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11998-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bacteriophage Sf14 infects Shigella flexneri, a major foodborne pathogen that causes shigellosis outbreaks primarily in developing nations. It is a Moogle-like myovirus that encodes 26 tRNAs recognizing 19 different amino acids. The presence of tRNAs in phage genomes have been known for decades, but their functions are still poorly understood and appear to vary between species. This work uses computational methods to test several existing hypotheses regarding phage-encoded tRNAs in the context of Sf14 infection. Analyses of codon usage, tRNA adaptation, and tRNA mutation patterns were performed to test four hypotheses of phage tRNA function: codon usage bias, host range expansion, an all-destructive infection phenotype, and escape from host nucleases.

Results: Data from these analyses excluded hypotheses of host range expansion and escape from host anticodon nucleases. Instead, results suggest phage-encoded tRNAs are likely used during late stages of infection, primarily increasing expression of structural genes. While there are significant differences in codon usage bias between Sf14 gene groups and S. flexneri 2457T, translational efficiency of Sf14 late genes (as estimated by tRNA adaptation index) is highest when using the phage tRNA pool only.

Conclusions: The most likely hypothesis explaining the presence of tRNAs in the Sf14 genome is the possession of an all-destructive infection phenotype, where genes encoding host tRNAs are degraded along with the genome and translation relies heavily or exclusively on the phage tRNAs. The differences in codon usage also suggest phage-encoded tRNAs specifically affect the production of late gene products.

志贺氏菌噬菌体Sf14编码trna作用的计算研究。
背景:Sf14噬菌体感染福氏志贺氏菌,这是一种主要的食源性病原体,主要在发展中国家引起志贺氏菌病暴发。它是一种类似moogle的肌病毒,编码26个trna,识别19种不同的氨基酸。trna在噬菌体基因组中的存在已经知道了几十年,但是它们的功能仍然知之甚少,并且似乎在物种之间有所不同。这项工作使用计算方法来测试Sf14感染背景下关于噬菌体编码trna的几个现有假设。通过对密码子使用、tRNA适应和tRNA突变模式的分析,验证了噬菌体tRNA功能的四种假设:密码子使用偏差、宿主范围扩大、全破坏性感染表型和逃离宿主核酸酶。结果:这些分析的数据排除了宿主范围扩大和宿主反密码子核酸酶逃逸的假设。相反,结果表明噬菌体编码的trna可能在感染后期使用,主要是增加结构基因的表达。虽然Sf14基因组和S. flexneri 2457T之间的密码子使用偏差存在显著差异,但仅使用噬菌体tRNA池时,Sf14晚期基因的翻译效率(根据tRNA适应指数估计)最高。结论:最可能解释Sf14基因组中trna存在的假说是具有全破坏性感染表型,其中编码宿主trna的基因随基因组一起降解,翻译严重依赖或完全依赖噬菌体trna。密码子使用的差异也表明噬菌体编码的trna特异性地影响晚期基因产物的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信