Cosmic curl — features and convergence of the vorticity power spectrum in N-body simulations

IF 5.9 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Camilla T.G. Sørensen, Steen Hannestad and Thomas Tram
{"title":"Cosmic curl — features and convergence of the vorticity power spectrum in N-body simulations","authors":"Camilla T.G. Sørensen, Steen Hannestad and Thomas Tram","doi":"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observations of the cosmic velocity field could become an important cosmological probe in the near future. To take advantage of future velocity-flow surveys we must however have the theoretical predictions under control. In many respects, the velocity field is easier to simulate than the density field because it is less severely affected by small-scale clustering. Therefore, as we also show in this paper, a particle-mesh (PM) based simulation approach is usually sufficient, yielding results within a few percent of a corresponding P3M simulation in which short-range forces are properly accounted for, but which also carry a much larger computational cost. However, in other respects the velocity field is much more challenging to deal with than the density field: interpolating the velocity field onto a grid is significantly more complicated, and the vorticity field (the curl-part of the velocity field) is severely affected by both sample variance and discretisation effects. While the former can be dealt with using fixed amplitude initial conditions, the former makes it infeasible to run fully converged simulations in a cosmological volume. However, using the N-body code we show that one can robustly extrapolate the cosmic vorticity power spectrum from just 4 simulations with different number of particles. We expect our extrapolated vorticity power spectra to be correct within 5% of the fully converged result across three orders of magnitude in k. Finally, we have also investigated the time dependence of the vorticity as well as the ratio of vorticity to divergence.","PeriodicalId":15445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observations of the cosmic velocity field could become an important cosmological probe in the near future. To take advantage of future velocity-flow surveys we must however have the theoretical predictions under control. In many respects, the velocity field is easier to simulate than the density field because it is less severely affected by small-scale clustering. Therefore, as we also show in this paper, a particle-mesh (PM) based simulation approach is usually sufficient, yielding results within a few percent of a corresponding P3M simulation in which short-range forces are properly accounted for, but which also carry a much larger computational cost. However, in other respects the velocity field is much more challenging to deal with than the density field: interpolating the velocity field onto a grid is significantly more complicated, and the vorticity field (the curl-part of the velocity field) is severely affected by both sample variance and discretisation effects. While the former can be dealt with using fixed amplitude initial conditions, the former makes it infeasible to run fully converged simulations in a cosmological volume. However, using the N-body code we show that one can robustly extrapolate the cosmic vorticity power spectrum from just 4 simulations with different number of particles. We expect our extrapolated vorticity power spectra to be correct within 5% of the fully converged result across three orders of magnitude in k. Finally, we have also investigated the time dependence of the vorticity as well as the ratio of vorticity to divergence.
宇宙旋度——n体模拟中涡度功率谱的特征和收敛
在不久的将来,对宇宙速度场的观测可能成为一项重要的宇宙学探测。然而,为了利用未来的速度流调查,我们必须控制理论预测。在许多方面,速度场比密度场更容易模拟,因为它受小尺度聚类的影响较小。因此,正如我们在本文中所示,基于粒子网格(PM)的模拟方法通常是足够的,产生的结果在相应的P3M模拟的百分之几内,其中适当地考虑了短程力,但也带来了更大的计算成本。然而,在其他方面,处理速度场比处理密度场更具挑战性:将速度场插值到网格上要复杂得多,涡度场(速度场的旋流部分)受到样本方差和离散化效应的严重影响。虽然前者可以使用固定振幅初始条件来处理,但前者使得在宇宙体积中运行完全收敛的模拟变得不可行。然而,使用n体代码,我们表明人们可以从4个不同粒子数量的模拟中可靠地推断出宇宙涡度功率谱。我们期望外推的涡度功率谱在k中三个数量级的完全收敛结果的5%以内是正确的。最后,我们还研究了涡度的时间依赖性以及涡度与散度的比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
23.40%
发文量
632
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (JCAP) encompasses theoretical, observational and experimental areas as well as computation and simulation. The journal covers the latest developments in the theory of all fundamental interactions and their cosmological implications (e.g. M-theory and cosmology, brane cosmology). JCAP''s coverage also includes topics such as formation, dynamics and clustering of galaxies, pre-galactic star formation, x-ray astronomy, radio astronomy, gravitational lensing, active galactic nuclei, intergalactic and interstellar matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信