Empowering community health workers in rural Ethiopia with blended learning: an offline mobile application to enhance trainings and healthcare services.

Oxford open digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/oodh/oqaf022
Etsegent Arega Asmamaw, Mark Ryan Begley, Temesgen Ayehu Bele, Ruth Diriba Debar, Tamene Feyissa Egnuni, Julie Anne Krause, Abraham Zerihun Megenetta, Israel Ataro Otoro, Tibebu Benyam Sado, Netsanet Fetene Wendmagegn
{"title":"Empowering community health workers in rural Ethiopia with blended learning: an offline mobile application to enhance trainings and healthcare services.","authors":"Etsegent Arega Asmamaw, Mark Ryan Begley, Temesgen Ayehu Bele, Ruth Diriba Debar, Tamene Feyissa Egnuni, Julie Anne Krause, Abraham Zerihun Megenetta, Israel Ataro Otoro, Tibebu Benyam Sado, Netsanet Fetene Wendmagegn","doi":"10.1093/oodh/oqaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study addresses challenges in delivering in-service Integrated Refresher Training to 40 000 Health Extension Workers (HEWs) in rural Ethiopia. Through an offline multilingual mobile application, Extension Essentials (EE), it aims to improve their knowledge and skills through a less costly blended learning approach combining in-person facilitation with offline digital self-learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a pilot study from November 2021 to May 2022, a mixed-methods evaluation assessed knowledge, skills, satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of training focused on Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. HEWs and their supervisors were allocated by district into two groups: one receiving only conventional in-person training (conventional Integrated Refresher Training [IRT] control group) and the other using the mobile application for blended training (blended IRT treatment group). The evaluation utilized a quasi-experimental before-after matched comparison group design with 20 districts in the blended IRT treatment group study arm and 20 districts in the conventional IRT control group study arm. The blended IRT treatment group and conventional IRT control group sites were selected in consultation with the Ministry of Health using convenience sampling and matched based on location, population size and health infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Data showed learners engaged with the mobile app for an average of 2.8 hours per day (more than expected 2 hours) during self-learning, with high completion rates for activities (95%) and quizzes (88%). Learner knowledge scores improved significantly more from pre- to post-training in the blended IRT treatment group as compared to the conventional IRT control group (adjusted difference-in-differences: 2.01 percentage points, <i>P</i> = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.8-3.2), though the difference was not programmatically meaningful, indicating that both training modalities were similarly effective at improving knowledge. Skills assessment scores improved significantly in the blended IRT treatment group from 60% pre-training to 90% post-training (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no skill assessment conducted for the conventional IRT control group. Additionally, the blended approach reduced recurring training costs by 39% as compared to the conventional training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings indicate that the EE effectively enhances training through a flexible, user-friendly platform that addresses connectivity barriers and costs less than traditional methods, while yielding similar knowledge outcomes. Blended learning solutions are vital for scaling healthcare training in remote settings, warranting research on long-term impacts and broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":520498,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open digital health","volume":"3 ","pages":"oqaf022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study addresses challenges in delivering in-service Integrated Refresher Training to 40 000 Health Extension Workers (HEWs) in rural Ethiopia. Through an offline multilingual mobile application, Extension Essentials (EE), it aims to improve their knowledge and skills through a less costly blended learning approach combining in-person facilitation with offline digital self-learning.

Methods: In a pilot study from November 2021 to May 2022, a mixed-methods evaluation assessed knowledge, skills, satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of training focused on Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. HEWs and their supervisors were allocated by district into two groups: one receiving only conventional in-person training (conventional Integrated Refresher Training [IRT] control group) and the other using the mobile application for blended training (blended IRT treatment group). The evaluation utilized a quasi-experimental before-after matched comparison group design with 20 districts in the blended IRT treatment group study arm and 20 districts in the conventional IRT control group study arm. The blended IRT treatment group and conventional IRT control group sites were selected in consultation with the Ministry of Health using convenience sampling and matched based on location, population size and health infrastructure.

Findings: Data showed learners engaged with the mobile app for an average of 2.8 hours per day (more than expected 2 hours) during self-learning, with high completion rates for activities (95%) and quizzes (88%). Learner knowledge scores improved significantly more from pre- to post-training in the blended IRT treatment group as compared to the conventional IRT control group (adjusted difference-in-differences: 2.01 percentage points, P = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.8-3.2), though the difference was not programmatically meaningful, indicating that both training modalities were similarly effective at improving knowledge. Skills assessment scores improved significantly in the blended IRT treatment group from 60% pre-training to 90% post-training (P < 0.001). There was no skill assessment conducted for the conventional IRT control group. Additionally, the blended approach reduced recurring training costs by 39% as compared to the conventional training.

Conclusion: Findings indicate that the EE effectively enhances training through a flexible, user-friendly platform that addresses connectivity barriers and costs less than traditional methods, while yielding similar knowledge outcomes. Blended learning solutions are vital for scaling healthcare training in remote settings, warranting research on long-term impacts and broader applicability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过混合学习增强埃塞俄比亚农村社区卫生工作者的权能:一种线下移动应用程序,以加强培训和医疗保健服务。
本研究解决了在埃塞俄比亚农村向4万名卫生推广工作者(HEWs)提供在职综合进修培训的挑战。通过一款线下多语言移动应用程序Extension Essentials (EE),该项目旨在通过一种成本较低的混合学习方法,将面对面指导与线下数字自学相结合,提高他们的知识和技能。方法:在2021年11月至2022年5月的一项试点研究中,采用混合方法评估了以生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康为重点的培训的知识、技能、满意度和成本效益。医护人员及其主管按地区分为两组:一组只接受传统的现场培训(传统综合复习培训[IRT]对照组),另一组使用移动应用程序进行混合培训(混合IRT治疗组)。评估采用准实验前后匹配对照组设计,混合IRT治疗组研究组有20个区,常规IRT对照组研究组有20个区。混合IRT治疗组和常规IRT对照组是在与卫生部协商后使用方便抽样选择的,并根据地点、人口规模和卫生基础设施进行匹配。研究结果:数据显示,学习者在自学期间平均每天使用移动应用2.8小时(超过预期的2小时),活动完成率(95%)和测验完成率(88%)很高。与传统IRT对照组相比,混合IRT治疗组的学习者知识得分从训练前到训练后显著提高(调整差中差:2.01个百分点,P = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.8-3.2),尽管差异在程序上没有意义,表明两种训练方式在提高知识方面同样有效。混合IRT治疗组的技能评估得分显著提高,从训练前的60%提高到训练后的90% (P)。结论:研究结果表明,情感表达通过一个灵活、用户友好的平台有效地增强了培训,该平台解决了连接障碍,成本低于传统方法,同时产生了类似的知识结果。混合学习解决方案对于在远程环境中扩展医疗保健培训至关重要,它保证了对长期影响和更广泛适用性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信