Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of arch bar splinting versus wire composite splinting in the management of patients with dentoalveolar fractures.

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_154_23
Mrinalini Mathur, Nitin Bhola, Rajanikanth Kambala, Anchal Agarwal, Priyatam Mishra, Monica Gupta
{"title":"Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of arch bar splinting versus wire composite splinting in the management of patients with dentoalveolar fractures.","authors":"Mrinalini Mathur, Nitin Bhola, Rajanikanth Kambala, Anchal Agarwal, Priyatam Mishra, Monica Gupta","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_154_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dentoalveolar fracture involves injuries to the dentition, periodontium and alveolar bone, which may occur individually or concurrently. The International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines recommend the use of flexible splints for a shorter duration in cases of dentoalveolar trauma.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare and evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative outcome of the arch bar splinting and wire composite splinting in the management of Clark's Class II dentoalveolar fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients were randomized by Envelope method of randomization. Equal number of patients were randomly allocated to two groups, irrespective of age, gender, type, and severity of fractures. The study population was divided equally into two groups. Group A- Patients in whom dentoalveolar fractures were managed by arch bar splinting. Group B- Patients in whom dentoalveolar fractures were managed by wire composite splinting. All patients were managed by a single maxillofacial surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time for splinting in group B was 7.52±0.76 min. No glove perforation or intraoperative blood loss was observed in group B. No soft tissue injury in terms of mucosal ulcerations and gingival trauma was noted in patients of group B. The pain intensity recorded was mild on the VAS scale on postoperative day 1. This resulted in better patient comfort/acceptance of the treatment in patients of group B. Oral hygiene status evaluated by using Modified Turesky Gilmore Plaque Index was significantly better in group b as compared to group A(p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dentoalveolar fractures are mostly managed by closed treatment. The type and time of splinting depends on the type of injury and the amount of stabilization needed for the specific injury. The use of wire composite splint proved to be an ideal treatment option for Clark's Class II dentoalveolar fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"16 2","pages":"292-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_154_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dentoalveolar fracture involves injuries to the dentition, periodontium and alveolar bone, which may occur individually or concurrently. The International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines recommend the use of flexible splints for a shorter duration in cases of dentoalveolar trauma.

Objectives: To compare and evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative outcome of the arch bar splinting and wire composite splinting in the management of Clark's Class II dentoalveolar fractures.

Materials and methods: Patients were randomized by Envelope method of randomization. Equal number of patients were randomly allocated to two groups, irrespective of age, gender, type, and severity of fractures. The study population was divided equally into two groups. Group A- Patients in whom dentoalveolar fractures were managed by arch bar splinting. Group B- Patients in whom dentoalveolar fractures were managed by wire composite splinting. All patients were managed by a single maxillofacial surgeon.

Results: The mean time for splinting in group B was 7.52±0.76 min. No glove perforation or intraoperative blood loss was observed in group B. No soft tissue injury in terms of mucosal ulcerations and gingival trauma was noted in patients of group B. The pain intensity recorded was mild on the VAS scale on postoperative day 1. This resulted in better patient comfort/acceptance of the treatment in patients of group B. Oral hygiene status evaluated by using Modified Turesky Gilmore Plaque Index was significantly better in group b as compared to group A(p=0.018).

Conclusion: Dentoalveolar fractures are mostly managed by closed treatment. The type and time of splinting depends on the type of injury and the amount of stabilization needed for the specific injury. The use of wire composite splint proved to be an ideal treatment option for Clark's Class II dentoalveolar fractures.

弓棒夹板与金属丝复合夹板治疗牙槽骨骨折的术中、术后疗效比较。
牙槽骨骨折包括牙列、牙周组织和牙槽骨的损伤,可单独发生,也可同时发生。国际牙外伤协会(IADT)指南建议在牙槽外伤病例中使用短时间的柔性夹板。目的:比较评价弓棒夹板与金属丝复合夹板治疗克拉克氏ⅱ类牙槽骨骨折的术中、术后疗效。材料与方法:采用随机化包络法对患者进行随机化。将相同数量的患者随机分为两组,不考虑年龄、性别、类型和骨折严重程度。研究人群被平均分为两组。A组:采用弓棒夹板治疗牙槽骨骨折的患者。B组:采用金属丝复合夹板治疗牙槽骨骨折的患者。所有患者均由一名颌面外科医生治疗。结果:B组平均夹板时间为7.52±0.76 min。b组无手套穿孔、术中出血。b组无黏膜溃疡、牙龈损伤等软组织损伤。术后第1天VAS评分疼痛强度较轻。这导致b组患者对治疗的舒适度/接受度更高。使用Modified Turesky Gilmore斑块指数评估的口腔卫生状况,b组明显优于A组(p=0.018)。结论:牙槽骨骨折多采用封闭治疗。夹板的类型和时间取决于损伤的类型和特定损伤所需的稳定量。使用金属丝复合夹板被证明是治疗克拉克氏II类牙槽骨骨折的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信