Monitoring atopic dermatitis using mobile-app based photography and surveys.

IF 3.9
Georgia Marquez-Grap, Andrea Leung, Faye Orcales, Allison Kranyak, Chandler Johnson, Payton Smith, Kathryn Haran, Hunter Mills, Gundolf Schenk, Abhilash Kahlon, Jaskiran Kaur, Navdeep Dhaliwal, Molly Lucas, Vivek Rudrapatna, Gabriela O Cula, Wilson Liao
{"title":"Monitoring atopic dermatitis using mobile-app based photography and surveys.","authors":"Georgia Marquez-Grap, Andrea Leung, Faye Orcales, Allison Kranyak, Chandler Johnson, Payton Smith, Kathryn Haran, Hunter Mills, Gundolf Schenk, Abhilash Kahlon, Jaskiran Kaur, Navdeep Dhaliwal, Molly Lucas, Vivek Rudrapatna, Gabriela O Cula, Wilson Liao","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2555983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>Remote clinical research has potential to increase study diversity, reduce costs for researchers and participants, and increase efficiency of studies. This study evaluates the reliability and feasibility of using SkinTracker, a mobile application, for remote AD severity assessment through mobile-app based photography and surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center observational study enrolled 28 participants (18 with AD and 10 healthy controls) in an eight-week hybrid clinical study. Participants completed bi-weekly tasks and submitted standardized skin photographs via the SkinTracker app, and clinic-based skin exams and digital single-lens reflex (SLR) photos were obtained at baseline and week 8. Eczema Area Severity Index and Investigator Global Assessment scores were assigned to the photographs by a grader. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate agreement between app-based, in-person, and SLR assessments for the 18 participants with AD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>App-based AD assessment scores had excellent agreement with in-person scores, indicating the reliability of SkinTracker to assess disease activity remotely. Furthermore, all participants had high compliance and satisfaction with app-based activities, indicating that using SkinTracker for remote clinical research is achievable and even preferred by participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings show that SkinTracker is both reliable and feasible for monitoring atopic dermatitis disease activity remotely.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2555983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2555983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/aim: Remote clinical research has potential to increase study diversity, reduce costs for researchers and participants, and increase efficiency of studies. This study evaluates the reliability and feasibility of using SkinTracker, a mobile application, for remote AD severity assessment through mobile-app based photography and surveys.

Methods: This single-center observational study enrolled 28 participants (18 with AD and 10 healthy controls) in an eight-week hybrid clinical study. Participants completed bi-weekly tasks and submitted standardized skin photographs via the SkinTracker app, and clinic-based skin exams and digital single-lens reflex (SLR) photos were obtained at baseline and week 8. Eczema Area Severity Index and Investigator Global Assessment scores were assigned to the photographs by a grader. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate agreement between app-based, in-person, and SLR assessments for the 18 participants with AD.

Results: App-based AD assessment scores had excellent agreement with in-person scores, indicating the reliability of SkinTracker to assess disease activity remotely. Furthermore, all participants had high compliance and satisfaction with app-based activities, indicating that using SkinTracker for remote clinical research is achievable and even preferred by participants.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings show that SkinTracker is both reliable and feasible for monitoring atopic dermatitis disease activity remotely.

使用基于移动应用程序的摄影和调查来监测特应性皮炎。
目的:远程临床研究有可能增加研究的多样性,降低研究人员和参与者的成本,提高研究效率。本研究评估了使用SkinTracker(一款移动应用程序)通过基于移动应用程序的摄影和调查来远程评估AD严重程度的可靠性和可行性。方法:这项单中心观察性研究在为期8周的混合临床研究中招募了28名参与者(18名AD患者和10名健康对照)。参与者每两周完成一次任务,并通过SkinTracker应用程序提交标准化皮肤照片,并在基线和第8周获得基于临床的皮肤检查和数码单反(SLR)照片。湿疹区域严重指数和研究者全球评估分数由评分员分配给照片。使用类内相关系数来评估18名AD患者基于应用程序、面对面评估和SLR评估之间的一致性。结果:基于应用程序的AD评估评分与现场评分非常一致,表明SkinTracker远程评估疾病活动的可靠性。此外,所有参与者对基于app的活动都有很高的依从性和满意度,这表明使用SkinTracker进行远程临床研究是可以实现的,甚至是参与者的首选。结论:总的来说,这些发现表明SkinTracker在远程监测特应性皮炎疾病活动方面是可靠和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信