Radiographic outcomes decline linearly with increased time to surgery in distal radius fractures: A cohort analysis.

IF 1.6
Mats Wadsten, Albert Christersson, Ana Farah-Mwais, Magnus Tägil, Emma Haskovec, Markus Engquist, Viktor Schmidt
{"title":"Radiographic outcomes decline linearly with increased time to surgery in distal radius fractures: A cohort analysis.","authors":"Mats Wadsten, Albert Christersson, Ana Farah-Mwais, Magnus Tägil, Emma Haskovec, Markus Engquist, Viktor Schmidt","doi":"10.1177/17531934251379171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal timing for distal radial fracture fixation remains controversial. Most previous studies have dichotomized timing into early or delayed categories, potentially obscuring the true effect of delay. This study investigated surgical timing as a continuous variable to determine its influence on radiographic alignment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective multicentre cohort study, we reviewed 691 surgically treated distal radial fractures across four Swedish hospitals. Radiographic parameters assessed included dorsal tilt (primary outcome), radial inclination, ulnar variance, intra-articular step, coronal shift and anterior apposition. Logistic regression was used to analyse overall acceptable alignment, while linear regression was used for dorsal tilt. Models were adjusted for age and sex. Interobserver reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 61 years, and 80% of the cohort were female. Each additional day delay to surgery increased the risk of unacceptable alignment by 6%, corresponding to a twofold risk increase with a 2 week delay. Dorsal tilt worsened linearly by approximately 0.34° per day, accumulating to nearly 5° after 2 weeks. Male sex was associated with significantly greater dorsal tilt (mean difference >2°) and reduced correction compared with females. Interclass correlation coefficients demonstrated excellent reliability for dorsal tilt (0.952) and radial inclination (0.947), and moderate reliability for ulnar variance (0.748) and coronal shift (0.611).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A linear relationship was identified between surgical delay and declining radiographic outcomes, highlighting that each day's delay progressively compromises fracture alignment. These findings emphasize the importance of prompt surgical intervention for distal radial fractures to achieve optimal radiographic results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong><b>III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934251379171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251379171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal timing for distal radial fracture fixation remains controversial. Most previous studies have dichotomized timing into early or delayed categories, potentially obscuring the true effect of delay. This study investigated surgical timing as a continuous variable to determine its influence on radiographic alignment.

Methods: In a retrospective multicentre cohort study, we reviewed 691 surgically treated distal radial fractures across four Swedish hospitals. Radiographic parameters assessed included dorsal tilt (primary outcome), radial inclination, ulnar variance, intra-articular step, coronal shift and anterior apposition. Logistic regression was used to analyse overall acceptable alignment, while linear regression was used for dorsal tilt. Models were adjusted for age and sex. Interobserver reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: The mean patient age was 61 years, and 80% of the cohort were female. Each additional day delay to surgery increased the risk of unacceptable alignment by 6%, corresponding to a twofold risk increase with a 2 week delay. Dorsal tilt worsened linearly by approximately 0.34° per day, accumulating to nearly 5° after 2 weeks. Male sex was associated with significantly greater dorsal tilt (mean difference >2°) and reduced correction compared with females. Interclass correlation coefficients demonstrated excellent reliability for dorsal tilt (0.952) and radial inclination (0.947), and moderate reliability for ulnar variance (0.748) and coronal shift (0.611).

Conclusion: A linear relationship was identified between surgical delay and declining radiographic outcomes, highlighting that each day's delay progressively compromises fracture alignment. These findings emphasize the importance of prompt surgical intervention for distal radial fractures to achieve optimal radiographic results.

Level of evidence: III.

桡骨远端骨折的影像学结果随着手术时间的增加呈线性下降:一项队列分析。
桡骨远端骨折固定的最佳时机仍有争议。大多数先前的研究将时间分为早或晚两类,潜在地模糊了延迟的真正影响。本研究将手术时间作为一个连续变量来研究其对x线对准的影响。方法:在一项回顾性多中心队列研究中,我们回顾了瑞典四家医院的691例手术治疗的桡骨远端骨折。评估的影像学参数包括背侧倾斜(主要结果)、桡侧倾斜、尺侧变异、关节内步、冠状移位和前向移位。逻辑回归用于分析总体可接受的对齐,而线性回归用于分析背部倾斜。模型根据年龄和性别进行了调整。用类内相关系数评价观察者间的信度。结果:患者平均年龄61岁,80%为女性。延迟手术每多一天,不可接受对齐的风险增加6%,相当于延迟2周风险增加两倍。背部倾斜以每天约0.34°的速度线性恶化,两周后累积到近5°。与女性相比,男性与更大的背部倾斜(平均差值bb0.2°)和更少的矫正相关。类间相关系数显示,背侧倾角(0.952)和径向倾角(0.947)的信度较好,尺侧方差(0.748)和冠状位移(0.611)的信度中等。结论:确定了手术延迟与放射学结果下降之间的线性关系,强调每一天的延迟逐渐损害骨折对齐。这些发现强调了对桡骨远端骨折进行及时手术干预以获得最佳影像学结果的重要性。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信