How recovery influences community reintegration: perspectives of persons with spinal cord injury and their support persons.

IF 1.9 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1617764
Anne M Bryden, Brian Gran, Susan Hinze, Mary Ann Richmond, Kim D Anderson
{"title":"How recovery influences community reintegration: perspectives of persons with spinal cord injury and their support persons.","authors":"Anne M Bryden, Brian Gran, Susan Hinze, Mary Ann Richmond, Kim D Anderson","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1617764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate how perceived recovery influences perspectives on successful community reintegration, from the point of view of persons with spinal cord injury (PWS) and their support persons (SP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our mixed methods approach included qualitative interviews conducted with civilians and Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their designated SP at three time points across the first year after SCI: during inpatient rehabilitation, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants with SCI completed measures of independence [Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)] and self-efficacy (Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale) during inpatient rehabilitation and at 12 months postinjury. Data analysis was informed by the Transformative Framework and International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding perceptions of how recovery influences community reintegration, PWS most often reported themes related to slow recovery whereas SPs expressed concerns about psychological impacts on PWS. While some participants were equally satisfied with rate of recovery and rate of community reintegration, several deviated from that expected trajectory. Associations between satisfaction with community reintegration and independence or self-efficacy were variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful community reintegration cannot be predicted solely on clinical measures. Inclusion of perspectives of PWS and their support systems is critical to inform successful societal participation after SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1617764"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1617764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how perceived recovery influences perspectives on successful community reintegration, from the point of view of persons with spinal cord injury (PWS) and their support persons (SP).

Methods: Our mixed methods approach included qualitative interviews conducted with civilians and Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their designated SP at three time points across the first year after SCI: during inpatient rehabilitation, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants with SCI completed measures of independence [Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure III (SCIM-III)] and self-efficacy (Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale) during inpatient rehabilitation and at 12 months postinjury. Data analysis was informed by the Transformative Framework and International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

Results: Regarding perceptions of how recovery influences community reintegration, PWS most often reported themes related to slow recovery whereas SPs expressed concerns about psychological impacts on PWS. While some participants were equally satisfied with rate of recovery and rate of community reintegration, several deviated from that expected trajectory. Associations between satisfaction with community reintegration and independence or self-efficacy were variable.

Conclusions: Successful community reintegration cannot be predicted solely on clinical measures. Inclusion of perspectives of PWS and their support systems is critical to inform successful societal participation after SCI.

康复如何影响社区重返社会:脊髓损伤患者及其支持人员的观点。
目的:从脊髓损伤患者(PWS)及其支持人员(SP)的角度,探讨感知康复如何影响成功重返社区的观点。方法:我们的混合方法包括对脊髓损伤(SCI)的平民和退伍军人及其指定SP在SCI后第一年的三个时间点进行定性访谈:住院康复期间,6个月和12个月。脊髓损伤患者在住院康复期间和损伤后12个月完成独立性测量[脊髓损伤独立性测量III (SCI -III)]和自我效能(Moorong自我效能量表)。数据分析依据《变革框架》和国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)。结果:关于康复如何影响社区重返社会的看法,PWS最常报告的主题与缓慢康复有关,而SPs则关注对PWS的心理影响。虽然一些参与者对康复率和重返社区率同样满意,但有几个人偏离了预期的轨迹。重新融入社区的满意度与独立性或自我效能感之间的关系是可变的。结论:成功的社区重新融入不能仅仅通过临床措施来预测。纳入PWS及其支持系统的观点对于SCI后成功的社会参与至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信