Therapeutic Lying in Dementia Care: Attitudes and Knowledge Among Social Workers in Spain.

IF 1.4
Ruben Yusta-Tirado, Sonia García-Aguña, Pablo De Gea Grela, Lorena Patricia Gallardo-Peralta, Esteban Sanchez-Moreno
{"title":"Therapeutic Lying in Dementia Care: Attitudes and Knowledge Among Social Workers in Spain.","authors":"Ruben Yusta-Tirado, Sonia García-Aguña, Pablo De Gea Grela, Lorena Patricia Gallardo-Peralta, Esteban Sanchez-Moreno","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2025.2559278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explores the use, knowledge, and acceptance of therapeutic lying among social workers in Spain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive design was used. Participants were 253 practicing social workers, recruited via purposive sampling through professional associations and institutional networks. Data were collected through an online questionnaire covering sociodemographic and professional characteristics, acceptance and use of therapeutic lying, and prior knowledge/training. Acceptance was measured with the validated16-item Acceptance of Lying to People with Dementia, supplemented by four <i>ad hoc</i>items on previous experience, frequency of use, perceived acceptability, and prior knowledge. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro - Wilk tests for normality, Student'st-tests for group comparisons, and chi-square tests for categorical associations (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While 83.8% reported having used therapeutic lying at least once,58.1% were unfamiliar with the term. The Acceptance of Lying to People with Dementia scale showed moderate overall acceptance (<i>M</i> = 50.67), with differences based on sector and prior experience. Socialworkers in gerontological settings and in private or third-sector institutions reported higher usage and acceptance levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings reveal a gap between practice and formal knowledge,raising concerns about ethical consistency. The study highlights the need for training, institutional protocols, and ethical guidance to support decision-making in dementia care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promoting structured reflection on this issue is essential to ensureperson-centered, ethically grounded, and professionally coherent social work practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2559278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the use, knowledge, and acceptance of therapeutic lying among social workers in Spain.

Materials and methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive design was used. Participants were 253 practicing social workers, recruited via purposive sampling through professional associations and institutional networks. Data were collected through an online questionnaire covering sociodemographic and professional characteristics, acceptance and use of therapeutic lying, and prior knowledge/training. Acceptance was measured with the validated16-item Acceptance of Lying to People with Dementia, supplemented by four ad hocitems on previous experience, frequency of use, perceived acceptability, and prior knowledge. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro - Wilk tests for normality, Student'st-tests for group comparisons, and chi-square tests for categorical associations (p < .05).

Results: While 83.8% reported having used therapeutic lying at least once,58.1% were unfamiliar with the term. The Acceptance of Lying to People with Dementia scale showed moderate overall acceptance (M = 50.67), with differences based on sector and prior experience. Socialworkers in gerontological settings and in private or third-sector institutions reported higher usage and acceptance levels.

Discussion: The findings reveal a gap between practice and formal knowledge,raising concerns about ethical consistency. The study highlights the need for training, institutional protocols, and ethical guidance to support decision-making in dementia care.

Conclusion: Promoting structured reflection on this issue is essential to ensureperson-centered, ethically grounded, and professionally coherent social work practice.

治疗性说谎在痴呆护理:西班牙社会工作者的态度和知识。
目的:本研究探讨西班牙社工对治疗性说谎的使用、认知和接受程度。材料与方法:采用定量、横断面、描述性设计。参与者是253名执业社会工作者,通过专业协会和机构网络进行有目的抽样。数据通过在线问卷收集,包括社会人口学和职业特征,治疗性谎言的接受和使用,以及先前的知识/培训。接受度是通过对痴呆症患者撒谎的16项接受度来衡量的,辅以4项关于以往经验、使用频率、感知接受度和先前知识的特别项目。使用描述性统计、夏皮罗-威尔克检验(Shapiro - Wilk test)检验正态性、学生st检验(Student’s -test)检验组比较和卡方检验(χ 2)检验分类关联(p)分析数据。结果:83.8%的患者报告至少使用过一次治疗性说谎,58.1%的患者不熟悉该术语。对痴呆症患者撒谎的接受度量表总体上表现为中等接受度(M = 50.67),但存在行业和先前经验的差异。老年机构和私人或第三部门机构的社会工作者报告了更高的使用率和接受水平。讨论:研究结果揭示了实践和正式知识之间的差距,引起了对道德一致性的关注。该研究强调需要培训、机构协议和道德指导来支持痴呆症护理决策。结论:促进对这一问题的结构化反思对于确保以人为本、以道德为基础和专业一致的社会工作实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信