Feasibility and effectiveness of a smartphone access program for promoting engagement in care among perinatal people with substance use disorders: a pilot study.
D J Goodman, L Lamadriz, K Stokes, M Adams, H Martell, K Robie, A Morgan, E C Saunders
{"title":"Feasibility and effectiveness of a smartphone access program for promoting engagement in care among perinatal people with substance use disorders: a pilot study.","authors":"D J Goodman, L Lamadriz, K Stokes, M Adams, H Martell, K Robie, A Morgan, E C Saunders","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1640311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnant and postpartum people with substance use disorders (SUD) experience high rates of morbidity and mortality, especially postpartum. For this vulnerable group, lack of access to a phone contributes to poor engagement in perinatal care. This paper describes initial work evaluating the implementation of a free smartphone program for rural pregnant patients with SUD and its effectiveness for improving participation in care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective type I hybrid-effectiveness cohort study evaluated program effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of implementation in obstetric practice. Semi-structured interviews with patients, providers and obstetric staff (<i>n</i> = 8) explored implementation success. Data on phone utilization, engagement in care and outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records and compared among three cohorts (Cohort 1: patients with SUD who received phones; Cohort 2: patients with SUD not receiving phones; Cohort 3: Patients without SUD). Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared/Fisher's Exact tests were utilized for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providers, staff, and patients universally found the smartphone access program useful, perceiving that it improved patient engagement in digital and in-clinic care. From 2021 to 2024, 44 patients with SUD participated in the smartphone program for an average of 162 days. Cohort 1 entered prenatal care later, attended fewer prenatal visits, and were more likely to have psychiatric comorbidity than Cohorts 2 and 3. After receiving a smartphone, there were no differences in postpartum visits between cohorts, and higher rates of behavioral health and recovery support for Cohort 1.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In a rural obstetric clinic, implementing a free smartphone program for perinatal patients with SUD was feasible and acceptable. Though there was no difference in prenatal care utilization, patients who received a smartphone engaged in robust postpartum care and behavioral healthcare utilization. Addressing digital disparities is an essential component of health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1640311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1640311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant and postpartum people with substance use disorders (SUD) experience high rates of morbidity and mortality, especially postpartum. For this vulnerable group, lack of access to a phone contributes to poor engagement in perinatal care. This paper describes initial work evaluating the implementation of a free smartphone program for rural pregnant patients with SUD and its effectiveness for improving participation in care.
Methods: This retrospective type I hybrid-effectiveness cohort study evaluated program effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of implementation in obstetric practice. Semi-structured interviews with patients, providers and obstetric staff (n = 8) explored implementation success. Data on phone utilization, engagement in care and outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records and compared among three cohorts (Cohort 1: patients with SUD who received phones; Cohort 2: patients with SUD not receiving phones; Cohort 3: Patients without SUD). Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared/Fisher's Exact tests were utilized for comparisons.
Results: Providers, staff, and patients universally found the smartphone access program useful, perceiving that it improved patient engagement in digital and in-clinic care. From 2021 to 2024, 44 patients with SUD participated in the smartphone program for an average of 162 days. Cohort 1 entered prenatal care later, attended fewer prenatal visits, and were more likely to have psychiatric comorbidity than Cohorts 2 and 3. After receiving a smartphone, there were no differences in postpartum visits between cohorts, and higher rates of behavioral health and recovery support for Cohort 1.
Discussion: In a rural obstetric clinic, implementing a free smartphone program for perinatal patients with SUD was feasible and acceptable. Though there was no difference in prenatal care utilization, patients who received a smartphone engaged in robust postpartum care and behavioral healthcare utilization. Addressing digital disparities is an essential component of health equity.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
