{"title":"Emergency Health Care Workers' Preparedness and Willingness to Respond to a Dirty Bomb-related Disaster in Pakistan.","authors":"Badar Afzal, Ume-E-Aimen Chhipa, Nargis Asad, Bee-Ah Kang, Daniel Barnett, Amber Mehmood, Simran Motwani, Jawed Dars, Junaid Razzak","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2025.10208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our study examined the association between willingness-to-respond (WTR) and behavioral factors, demographics, and work-related characteristics among emergency department healthcare workers (HCWs) toward a radiological dispersal device (RDD) (\"dirty bomb\") blast scenario in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August to September 2022 among emergency department HCWs from 2 hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Nonprobability purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between WTR and key attitudes/beliefs, including perceived norms, preparedness, and safety, as well as the EPPM variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among behavioral factors, perceived likelihood that colleagues will report to work duty, perceived importance of one's role, and psychological preparedness showed particularly significant associations with WTR; 53.6% of participants indicated low perceived threat, while 46.43% showed high perceived threat, toward an RDD disaster scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings point to the need to improve WTR toward an RDD event by shifting behavioral factors among HCWs through efficacy-focused training; enhancing WTR through such training strategies is imperative beyond mere delivery of information. Changing norms around response, along with institutional support, may further boost WTR during RDD emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":"19 ","pages":"e282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.10208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Our study examined the association between willingness-to-respond (WTR) and behavioral factors, demographics, and work-related characteristics among emergency department healthcare workers (HCWs) toward a radiological dispersal device (RDD) ("dirty bomb") blast scenario in Pakistan.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in August to September 2022 among emergency department HCWs from 2 hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Nonprobability purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between WTR and key attitudes/beliefs, including perceived norms, preparedness, and safety, as well as the EPPM variables.
Results: Among behavioral factors, perceived likelihood that colleagues will report to work duty, perceived importance of one's role, and psychological preparedness showed particularly significant associations with WTR; 53.6% of participants indicated low perceived threat, while 46.43% showed high perceived threat, toward an RDD disaster scenario.
Conclusion: Our findings point to the need to improve WTR toward an RDD event by shifting behavioral factors among HCWs through efficacy-focused training; enhancing WTR through such training strategies is imperative beyond mere delivery of information. Changing norms around response, along with institutional support, may further boost WTR during RDD emergencies.
期刊介绍:
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.