Integrating nursing activities into general practices in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study.

IF 1.7
Muriel Schütz Leuthold, Joëlle Schwarz, Fatima El Hakmaoui, Renzo Scuderi, Nicolas Senn, Christine Cohidon
{"title":"Integrating nursing activities into general practices in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Muriel Schütz Leuthold, Joëlle Schwarz, Fatima El Hakmaoui, Renzo Scuderi, Nicolas Senn, Christine Cohidon","doi":"10.1017/S146342362510039X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to describe the rollout of nursing activities during the pilot project's first 12 months (2019-2021), especially relating to what was initially planned in the nurses' job description.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>To provide more comprehensive services and reinforce primary care, a pilot implementation study assessed the integration of nursing activities into eight general practitioners' (GPs') practices. The study evaluated how new types of activities were integrated and rolled out over the first year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods observational study collected quantitative data on nursing activities and duration and qualitative data via five interviews with nurses and patients and one focus group with six GPs. Investigators combined quantitative and qualitative data in discussions about their results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>New nursing activities were rolled out progressively, especially follow-up activities with chronically ill patients, with a median time dedicated/month of 21h58 (range: 9h25 to 64h50) at six months and 48h43 (range: 11h01 to 59h51) at 12 months. One-off clinical activities are more easily integrated: the median time dedicated/month was 40h01 (range: 13h44 to 74h53) at six months and 40h30 (range: 9h38 to 76h51) at 12 months. Three elements were crucial in the implementation of nursing activities. The nurse's previous professional experience influenced the scope of activities developed. GPs' willingness to refer patients to the nurses enabled the latter to carry out follow-up activities with care plan. Lastly, the implementation of nursing activities was also made possible by patients' acceptance of being cared for by nurse instead of a GP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of nursing activities increased progressively, although more slowly for activities with chronically ill patients and within care plans, principally due to the overall change faced by GPs and nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S146342362510039X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to describe the rollout of nursing activities during the pilot project's first 12 months (2019-2021), especially relating to what was initially planned in the nurses' job description.

Background: To provide more comprehensive services and reinforce primary care, a pilot implementation study assessed the integration of nursing activities into eight general practitioners' (GPs') practices. The study evaluated how new types of activities were integrated and rolled out over the first year.

Methods: A mixed-methods observational study collected quantitative data on nursing activities and duration and qualitative data via five interviews with nurses and patients and one focus group with six GPs. Investigators combined quantitative and qualitative data in discussions about their results.

Results: New nursing activities were rolled out progressively, especially follow-up activities with chronically ill patients, with a median time dedicated/month of 21h58 (range: 9h25 to 64h50) at six months and 48h43 (range: 11h01 to 59h51) at 12 months. One-off clinical activities are more easily integrated: the median time dedicated/month was 40h01 (range: 13h44 to 74h53) at six months and 40h30 (range: 9h38 to 76h51) at 12 months. Three elements were crucial in the implementation of nursing activities. The nurse's previous professional experience influenced the scope of activities developed. GPs' willingness to refer patients to the nurses enabled the latter to carry out follow-up activities with care plan. Lastly, the implementation of nursing activities was also made possible by patients' acceptance of being cared for by nurse instead of a GP.

Conclusion: Implementation of nursing activities increased progressively, although more slowly for activities with chronically ill patients and within care plans, principally due to the overall change faced by GPs and nurses.

将护理活动纳入瑞士的一般实践:一项混合方法研究。
目的:本研究的目的是描述试点项目前12个月(2019-2021年)护理活动的推出情况,特别是与护士职位描述中最初计划的内容有关。背景:为了提供更全面的服务和加强初级保健,一项试点实施研究评估了护理活动融入8名全科医生(gp)的实践。这项研究评估了新类型的活动在第一年是如何整合和推出的。方法:采用混合方法观察性研究,通过对5名护士和患者的访谈,以及6名全科医生的焦点小组,收集护理活动和持续时间的定量数据和定性数据。研究人员在讨论他们的结果时结合了定量和定性数据。结果:新的护理活动逐步推出,特别是慢性病患者的随访活动,6个月时的中位护理时间为21h58(范围:9h25至64h50), 12个月时的中位护理时间为48h43(范围:11h01至59h51)。一次性临床活动更容易整合:六个月的中位专用时间为40h01(范围:13h44至74h53), 12个月的中位专用时间为40h30(范围:9h38至76h51)。实施护理活动的三个要素至关重要。护士以前的专业经验影响了活动发展的范围。全科医生愿意将患者转介给护士,使后者能够根据护理计划开展随访活动。最后,患者接受由护士而不是全科医生照顾,也使护理活动的实施成为可能。结论:护理活动的实施逐步增加,尽管慢性病患者和护理计划内的活动较慢,主要是由于全科医生和护士面临的整体变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信