{"title":"Mid to Long-Term Endoscopic Findings Following Conversion From Sleeve Gastrectomy to One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass","authors":"Hussein Allam Aldin, Abdolreza Pazouki, Fahime Yarigholi, Sepideh Hosseini, Tofigh Mobaderi, Farid Ahmad Qaderi, Seyed Nooredin Daryabari","doi":"10.1111/ases.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an option to address recurrent weight gain (RWG) or suboptimal clinical response (SoCR) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The need for endoscopic follow-ups in the mid- and long-term after conversional OAGB is less discussed. This study aims to assess the mid- and long-term endoscopic findings in patients undergoing conversional OAGB following SG.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospectively collected dataset from a retrospective study was analyzed in an academic fellowship-training hospital for patients who underwent conversion from SG to OAGB. Patients with pre- and post-operative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) results and at least 1 year of follow-up were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 108 patients underwent conversional OAGB following SG to treat RWG or SoCR. The patients were invited for follow-up EGD. A total of 40 of 108 patients accepted to undergo EGD. Of 40 patients (mean age: 42.45 ± 9.93 years), 32 (80%) were female. The mean follow-up period was 4.3 years. Significant BMI reduction was observed (mean BMI decreased from 46.58 to 34.04 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Endoscopic findings: 10% developed de novo non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 2.6% developed de novo esophagitis B, and one patient had bile reflux post-operatively. No esophagitis C, D, or Barrett's esophagus was observed. Marginal ulcers were seen in 10% post-conversion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Conversion of SG to OAGB effectively achieves significant weight loss. However, a mild risk remains for developing marginal ulcers and de novo esophagitis. OAGB is a promising conversional option to address RWG without any significant EGD pathological consequences in the mid to long term.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an option to address recurrent weight gain (RWG) or suboptimal clinical response (SoCR) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The need for endoscopic follow-ups in the mid- and long-term after conversional OAGB is less discussed. This study aims to assess the mid- and long-term endoscopic findings in patients undergoing conversional OAGB following SG.
Methods
A prospectively collected dataset from a retrospective study was analyzed in an academic fellowship-training hospital for patients who underwent conversion from SG to OAGB. Patients with pre- and post-operative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) results and at least 1 year of follow-up were included.
Results
A total of 108 patients underwent conversional OAGB following SG to treat RWG or SoCR. The patients were invited for follow-up EGD. A total of 40 of 108 patients accepted to undergo EGD. Of 40 patients (mean age: 42.45 ± 9.93 years), 32 (80%) were female. The mean follow-up period was 4.3 years. Significant BMI reduction was observed (mean BMI decreased from 46.58 to 34.04 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Endoscopic findings: 10% developed de novo non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 2.6% developed de novo esophagitis B, and one patient had bile reflux post-operatively. No esophagitis C, D, or Barrett's esophagus was observed. Marginal ulcers were seen in 10% post-conversion.
Discussion
Conversion of SG to OAGB effectively achieves significant weight loss. However, a mild risk remains for developing marginal ulcers and de novo esophagitis. OAGB is a promising conversional option to address RWG without any significant EGD pathological consequences in the mid to long term.