Risk Factors for Emergence Agitation in the Postanesthesia Care Unit: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sun Hee Moon, Seon Young Hwang
{"title":"Risk Factors for Emergence Agitation in the Postanesthesia Care Unit: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Sun Hee Moon, Seon Young Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of acute emergence agitation (EA) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) following general anesthesia and to examine associated risk factors to inform effective management strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary data analysis of data from 15,667 adult patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia at a tertiary general hospital in Seoul, Korea. To reduce selection bias and strengthen causal inference, we used propensity score matching at a 1:4 ratio, resulting in a final analysis of 6,620 patients. EA was defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of greater than or equal to +1. Risk factors were analyzed using binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The incidence of EA was significantly higher in patients with a pain score of 7 or above compared with those with a score below 3 (odds ratio [OR] = 8.080, P < .001). Patients undergoing procedures in Urology and Gynecology departments were 2.2 times more likely to experience EA than those in other departments such as Otolaryngology, Internal Medicine, Plastic Surgery, and Ophthalmology (OR = 2.171, P < .001). Lower serum albumin levels (OR = 1.582, P < .001) and lower blood glucose levels (OR = 0.996, P < .001) were also associated with a higher incidence of EA. Additional predictors included anesthesia duration longer than 2 hours (OR = 1.496, P < .001), the presence of a urinary catheter (OR = 1.313, P = .007), and undergoing anesthesia for the first time (OR = 1.213, P = .004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who have undergone surgery under general anesthesia and present with the risk factors identified in this study should be regarded as high risk for EA. Nurses in the PACU should identify and effectively manage these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of acute emergence agitation (EA) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) following general anesthesia and to examine associated risk factors to inform effective management strategies.

Design: A single-center retrospective observational study.

Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of data from 15,667 adult patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia at a tertiary general hospital in Seoul, Korea. To reduce selection bias and strengthen causal inference, we used propensity score matching at a 1:4 ratio, resulting in a final analysis of 6,620 patients. EA was defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of greater than or equal to +1. Risk factors were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

Findings: The incidence of EA was significantly higher in patients with a pain score of 7 or above compared with those with a score below 3 (odds ratio [OR] = 8.080, P < .001). Patients undergoing procedures in Urology and Gynecology departments were 2.2 times more likely to experience EA than those in other departments such as Otolaryngology, Internal Medicine, Plastic Surgery, and Ophthalmology (OR = 2.171, P < .001). Lower serum albumin levels (OR = 1.582, P < .001) and lower blood glucose levels (OR = 0.996, P < .001) were also associated with a higher incidence of EA. Additional predictors included anesthesia duration longer than 2 hours (OR = 1.496, P < .001), the presence of a urinary catheter (OR = 1.313, P = .007), and undergoing anesthesia for the first time (OR = 1.213, P = .004).

Conclusions: Patients who have undergone surgery under general anesthesia and present with the risk factors identified in this study should be regarded as high risk for EA. Nurses in the PACU should identify and effectively manage these patients.

麻醉后护理病房出现躁动的危险因素:倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:本研究的目的是确定麻醉后护理病房(PACU)全麻后急性出现躁动(EA)的预测因素,并检查相关的危险因素,为有效的管理策略提供信息。设计:单中心回顾性观察性研究。方法:我们对15667名在韩国首尔一家三级综合医院接受全身麻醉手术的成年患者的资料进行了二次数据分析。为了减少选择偏差和加强因果推理,我们使用1:4比例的倾向评分匹配,最终分析了6620名患者。EA定义为Richmond激动-镇静量表评分大于等于+1。采用二元logistic回归分析危险因素。结果:疼痛评分在7分及以上的患者EA的发生率明显高于低于3分的患者(优势比[or] = 8.080, P < 0.001)。泌尿外科和妇科患者发生EA的可能性是耳鼻喉科、内科、整形外科和眼科患者的2.2倍(OR = 2.171, P < 0.001)。较低的血清白蛋白水平(OR = 1.582, P < 0.001)和较低的血糖水平(OR = 0.996, P < 0.001)也与较高的EA发生率相关。其他预测因素包括麻醉时间超过2小时(OR = 1.496, P < 0.001)、存在导尿管(OR = 1.313, P = 0.007)和首次麻醉(OR = 1.213, P = 0.004)。结论:全麻手术患者存在本研究确定的危险因素,应视为EA高危患者,PACU护士应识别并有效管理这些患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信