Assessing male involvement in family planning: A scoping review of prevalence and its associated factors.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2025-09-01
A Alias, K Mokti, N Azhar, W H N Wan Mohamad Lotfi, A Hidrus, Z N Sidek Ahmad, S M I R Mohd Zali, M Y Ibrahim
{"title":"Assessing male involvement in family planning: A scoping review of prevalence and its associated factors.","authors":"A Alias, K Mokti, N Azhar, W H N Wan Mohamad Lotfi, A Hidrus, Z N Sidek Ahmad, S M I R Mohd Zali, M Y Ibrahim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family planning (FP) is a key component of the Safe Motherhood Program, aimed at reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. Male involvement in FP is increasingly recognized as essential for improving reproductive health outcomes through shared decisionmaking and spousal collaboration. This scoping review aimed to assess the prevalence of male involvement in family planning and identify the factors that influence their participation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus for peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024. Eligible studies reported on the prevalence and determinants of male involvement in FP. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data. Findings were synthesised descriptively and thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported male involvement in FP varied widely, ranging from 8.4% to 80%. Key influencing factors included education level, access to FP information, number of children, spousal communication, and attitudes towards contraception. Barriers included cultural norms, limited male-targeted services, and misconceptions about FP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male involvement in family planning remains inconsistent across regions. Targeted educational and community-based interventions are essential to enhance men's engagement in reproductive health and improve FP outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 5","pages":"642-648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family planning (FP) is a key component of the Safe Motherhood Program, aimed at reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. Male involvement in FP is increasingly recognized as essential for improving reproductive health outcomes through shared decisionmaking and spousal collaboration. This scoping review aimed to assess the prevalence of male involvement in family planning and identify the factors that influence their participation.

Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted in ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus for peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024. Eligible studies reported on the prevalence and determinants of male involvement in FP. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data. Findings were synthesised descriptively and thematically.

Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported male involvement in FP varied widely, ranging from 8.4% to 80%. Key influencing factors included education level, access to FP information, number of children, spousal communication, and attitudes towards contraception. Barriers included cultural norms, limited male-targeted services, and misconceptions about FP.

Conclusion: Male involvement in family planning remains inconsistent across regions. Targeted educational and community-based interventions are essential to enhance men's engagement in reproductive health and improve FP outcomes.

评估男性参与计划生育:流行程度及其相关因素的范围审查。
导言:计划生育是安全孕产方案的关键组成部分,旨在降低孕产妇死亡率和发病率。人们日益认识到,通过共同决策和配偶合作,男性参与计划生育对于改善生殖健康结果至关重要。这项范围审查的目的是评估男性参与计划生育的普遍程度,并确定影响他们参与的因素。材料和方法:在ProQuest、PubMed和Scopus中检索2014年至2024年间发表的同行评议文章。合格的研究报告了男性参与计划生育的患病率和决定因素。两位审稿人独立筛选文章并提取数据。研究结果是描述性和主题性的综合。结果:8项研究符合纳入标准。据报道,男性参与计划生育的比例差异很大,从8.4%到80%不等。主要影响因素包括受教育程度、计划生育信息获取、子女数量、配偶沟通和避孕态度。障碍包括文化规范、有限的针对男性的服务以及对计划生育的误解。结论:不同地区男性参与计划生育的情况不一致。有针对性的教育和社区干预措施对于加强男子参与生殖健康和改善计划生育成果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信