{"title":"Carotid endarteretomy: A single vascular centre experience in Malaysia.","authors":"M S Idris, D Y Ling, F F Carol, A R H Ramli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid artery stenosis remains one of the leading causes of major stroke. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has proven effective in preventing debilitating major stroke. However, the data on CEA in Malaysia is still lacking. University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia first embarked on CEA since 2017. We are reporting the outcomes of CEA performed in our centre.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case series of 20 patients who underwent CEA from the year 2017 until 2024. Patients having asymptomatic (≥60-99%) and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (≥50-99%) were selected for the procedure. All patients received best medical treatment, which include antithrombotic medications, lipid lowering therapy, blood pressure management, diabetes mellitus management and lifestyle modifications especially smoking cessation. All the patients underwent CEA under general anaesthesia. Shunting was done routinely. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and evaluated. Mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, postoperative bleeding, surgical site infection and cranial nerve injury at 30 days were the outcomes investigated. We also evaluated restenosis after CEA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients in our series were males 70% (n = 14) compared to 30% (n = 6) females. There were more symptomatic patients (n = 14) than asymptomatic patients (n = 6). There was one 30-day mortality among the symptomatic patients, while there was no 30-day mortality in the asymptomatic patients. The 30-day myocardial infarction was 5% (n = 1), which was the same symptomatic patient who died. In this cohort, only one patient had 30-day stroke (5%), which was a symptomatic patient. The patient recovered from the stroke after two weeks. Cranial nerve injuries happened in four patients (20%), where the commonest nerve injured was recurrent laryngeal nerve (n = 3). Only one patient had postoperative bleeding which did not need any reintervention. No surgical site infection was noted on all patients. Three patients developed restenosis, which was noted at two to six months post CEA. Two of the patients had symptomatic restenosis (more than 50% stenosis) which resulted in them being reoperated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The uptake of CEA in Malaysia is still slow. By sharing the outcomes data, hopefully it will create awareness among medical practitioners on the importance of early referral for carotid artery stenosis. Long term outcomes are very much needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 5","pages":"594-599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Carotid artery stenosis remains one of the leading causes of major stroke. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has proven effective in preventing debilitating major stroke. However, the data on CEA in Malaysia is still lacking. University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia first embarked on CEA since 2017. We are reporting the outcomes of CEA performed in our centre.
Materials and methods: This was a retrospective case series of 20 patients who underwent CEA from the year 2017 until 2024. Patients having asymptomatic (≥60-99%) and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (≥50-99%) were selected for the procedure. All patients received best medical treatment, which include antithrombotic medications, lipid lowering therapy, blood pressure management, diabetes mellitus management and lifestyle modifications especially smoking cessation. All the patients underwent CEA under general anaesthesia. Shunting was done routinely. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and evaluated. Mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, postoperative bleeding, surgical site infection and cranial nerve injury at 30 days were the outcomes investigated. We also evaluated restenosis after CEA.
Results: Most patients in our series were males 70% (n = 14) compared to 30% (n = 6) females. There were more symptomatic patients (n = 14) than asymptomatic patients (n = 6). There was one 30-day mortality among the symptomatic patients, while there was no 30-day mortality in the asymptomatic patients. The 30-day myocardial infarction was 5% (n = 1), which was the same symptomatic patient who died. In this cohort, only one patient had 30-day stroke (5%), which was a symptomatic patient. The patient recovered from the stroke after two weeks. Cranial nerve injuries happened in four patients (20%), where the commonest nerve injured was recurrent laryngeal nerve (n = 3). Only one patient had postoperative bleeding which did not need any reintervention. No surgical site infection was noted on all patients. Three patients developed restenosis, which was noted at two to six months post CEA. Two of the patients had symptomatic restenosis (more than 50% stenosis) which resulted in them being reoperated.
Conclusion: The uptake of CEA in Malaysia is still slow. By sharing the outcomes data, hopefully it will create awareness among medical practitioners on the importance of early referral for carotid artery stenosis. Long term outcomes are very much needed.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.