{"title":"Unmasking nasal basal cell carcinoma: Strategies for defect coverage.","authors":"A S Halim, M C Lim, H N R Shawaltul","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many reconstruction methods have been introduced for the reconstruction of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) post excision however no study has described the preferred reconstruction method in the Malaysia setting. Variations in resource availability and surgical training between regions may affect reconstructive choices. This study intends to find out our preferred method for reconstruction in nasal BCC patients post excision in our centre.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing different reconstruction methods and assessing outcomes for a series of patients with BCC post-resection, conducted in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Kelantan, from 2012 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seven patients were identified in this retrospective study, comprising five females and two males. The ages of these seven patients range from 60 to 77 years old. All seven patients who underwent excision postoperatively underwent immediate soft tissue reconstruction with either a local or regional flap, a free flap, or a combination of flaps. Among those seven patients, only one developed flap-related complications. All patients were followed up for at least 3 months, with a range of 3-38 months. Functional and cosmetic assessments over the resected area post-reconstruction were good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local flaps remain the preferred option for small and medium nasal BCC defects, while forehead flaps and free flaps are reserved for larger or complex defects. In Asian patients, thicker skin and pigmentation influence flap design and thinning to optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 5","pages":"550-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Many reconstruction methods have been introduced for the reconstruction of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) post excision however no study has described the preferred reconstruction method in the Malaysia setting. Variations in resource availability and surgical training between regions may affect reconstructive choices. This study intends to find out our preferred method for reconstruction in nasal BCC patients post excision in our centre.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing different reconstruction methods and assessing outcomes for a series of patients with BCC post-resection, conducted in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Kelantan, from 2012 to 2024.
Results: A total of seven patients were identified in this retrospective study, comprising five females and two males. The ages of these seven patients range from 60 to 77 years old. All seven patients who underwent excision postoperatively underwent immediate soft tissue reconstruction with either a local or regional flap, a free flap, or a combination of flaps. Among those seven patients, only one developed flap-related complications. All patients were followed up for at least 3 months, with a range of 3-38 months. Functional and cosmetic assessments over the resected area post-reconstruction were good.
Conclusion: Local flaps remain the preferred option for small and medium nasal BCC defects, while forehead flaps and free flaps are reserved for larger or complex defects. In Asian patients, thicker skin and pigmentation influence flap design and thinning to optimize outcomes.
许多重建方法已经被介绍用于基底细胞癌(BCC)切除后的重建,但没有研究描述在马来西亚设置的首选重建方法。不同地区之间的资源可用性和手术训练的差异可能会影响重建的选择。本研究旨在找出我们中心鼻基底细胞癌患者术后重建的首选方法。材料和方法:我们对2012年至2024年在马来西亚圣士大学医院(HUSM)和吉兰丹州Raja Perempuan Zainab II医院进行的一系列BCC切除术后患者进行了不同重建方法的回顾性图表回顾和评估结果。结果:本回顾性研究共发现7例患者,其中5例女性,2例男性。这7例患者的年龄从60岁到77岁不等。所有7例术后切除的患者均立即用局部或区域皮瓣、游离皮瓣或皮瓣组合进行软组织重建。在这7名患者中,只有1人出现了皮瓣相关并发症。所有患者均随访至少3个月,时间范围3-38个月。重建后对切除区域的功能和外观评价良好。结论:局部皮瓣仍是中小鼻部基底细胞癌缺损的首选,而前额皮瓣和游离皮瓣则保留用于较大或复杂的缺损。在亚洲患者中,较厚的皮肤和色素沉着影响皮瓣的设计和变薄以优化结果。
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.