Caitlin Canfield, Richard Casey Sadler, Lauren O'Connell, Marc Scott, Daniel Kruger, Alan Mendelsohn
{"title":"Spatial Analysis of Synthetic Clusters of Risk and Resilience in the Wake of the Flint Water Crisis.","authors":"Caitlin Canfield, Richard Casey Sadler, Lauren O'Connell, Marc Scott, Daniel Kruger, Alan Mendelsohn","doi":"10.1080/13549839.2025.2471002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Natural and anthropogenic disasters often have greater impact on marginalized communities because of structural disinvestment and racism. Impacts may not be uniform across communities; it is important to identify characteristics related to individual- and neighborhood-level resilience in the context of disaster. The Flint Water Crisis (FWC), given its varying, widespread impacts, provides an opportunity to examine these characteristics. Using Speak to Your Health! (STYH) survey data prior to (2013), during (2015), and after (2017) the FWC's onset, a synthetic longitudinal cohort was created, resulting in a cohort of 885 observations (295 per timepoint). Model-based clustering identified trajectory patterns of 4 factors (individual mental health, institutional trust, neighborhood satisfaction, social support). Each individual's cluster membership was mapped, and Getis-Ord Gi* Hot Spot Analysis identified geospatial patterns of cluster concentration. Five clusters were identified with distinct patterns of disaster impact and resilience: stressed; recovery; resilient; resilient-plus; and growth. Hot Spot analysis demonstrated patterns the cluster membership related to neighborhood sociodemographics, including race, SES, and vacancy rates; of note, the growth cluster was concentrated in the poorest and most heavily vacant neighborhoods. These findings have important implications for efforts to reduce the burden of natural and anthropogenic disasters and other community-level traumas. The results highlight the heterogeneity of outcomes within the same community. Mental health factors are particularly vulnerable. This study indicates that with appropriate response and investment, marginalized communities may demonstrate resilience and even growth following community-level trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":54257,"journal":{"name":"Local Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2025.2471002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Natural and anthropogenic disasters often have greater impact on marginalized communities because of structural disinvestment and racism. Impacts may not be uniform across communities; it is important to identify characteristics related to individual- and neighborhood-level resilience in the context of disaster. The Flint Water Crisis (FWC), given its varying, widespread impacts, provides an opportunity to examine these characteristics. Using Speak to Your Health! (STYH) survey data prior to (2013), during (2015), and after (2017) the FWC's onset, a synthetic longitudinal cohort was created, resulting in a cohort of 885 observations (295 per timepoint). Model-based clustering identified trajectory patterns of 4 factors (individual mental health, institutional trust, neighborhood satisfaction, social support). Each individual's cluster membership was mapped, and Getis-Ord Gi* Hot Spot Analysis identified geospatial patterns of cluster concentration. Five clusters were identified with distinct patterns of disaster impact and resilience: stressed; recovery; resilient; resilient-plus; and growth. Hot Spot analysis demonstrated patterns the cluster membership related to neighborhood sociodemographics, including race, SES, and vacancy rates; of note, the growth cluster was concentrated in the poorest and most heavily vacant neighborhoods. These findings have important implications for efforts to reduce the burden of natural and anthropogenic disasters and other community-level traumas. The results highlight the heterogeneity of outcomes within the same community. Mental health factors are particularly vulnerable. This study indicates that with appropriate response and investment, marginalized communities may demonstrate resilience and even growth following community-level trauma.
由于结构性投资减少和种族主义,自然灾害和人为灾害往往对边缘化社区产生更大的影响。不同社区的影响可能不尽相同;在灾难背景下,确定与个人和社区层面的复原力相关的特征是很重要的。弗林特水危机(FWC),鉴于其不同的,广泛的影响,提供了一个机会来检查这些特征。使用Speak to Your Health!(STYH)调查数据在(2013年)、(2015年)和(2017年)FWC开始之前(2015年)和之后(2017年)创建了一个综合纵向队列,产生了885个观察值(每个时间点295个)。基于模型的聚类识别了个体心理健康、机构信任、邻里满意度和社会支持4个因素的轨迹模式。通过Getis-Ord Gi*热点分析,确定了集群集中的地理空间格局。确定了五个具有不同灾害影响和复原力模式的集群:强调;复苏;有弹性的;resilient-plus;和增长。热点分析显示了集群成员与社区社会人口统计学相关的模式,包括种族、社会经济地位和空置率;值得注意的是,这一增长集群集中在最贫穷、空置率最高的社区。这些发现对于减轻自然灾害和人为灾害以及其他社区创伤的负担具有重要意义。结果强调了同一社区内结果的异质性。心理健康因素尤其脆弱。该研究表明,通过适当的应对和投资,边缘化社区可能在社区层面的创伤后表现出复原力甚至增长。
Local EnvironmentEnvironmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
88
期刊介绍:
Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability is a refereed journal written by and for researchers, activists, non-governmental organisations, students, teachers, policy makers and practitioners. Our focus is specifically on sustainability planning, policy and politics in relation to theoretical, conceptual and empirical studies at the nexus of equity, justice and the local environment. It is an inclusive forum for diverse constituencies and perspectives to engage in a critical examination, evaluation and discussion of the environmental, social and economic policies, processes and strategies which will be needed in movement towards social justice and sustainability - "Just Sustainabilities" - at local, regional, national and global scales.
Please note that we only accept submissions that share our focus. Based on critical research and practical experience, we are particularly seeking submissions from nations and continents representing different levels of income and industrial development and from countries in transition in order to engage in mutual learning and understanding.