Comparative Analysis of Primary and Second Primary Multiple Myeloma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795549251377882
Yoon Jung Jang, Joonseog Kong, Heyjin Kim, Chulkue Pak, Im Il Na, Hyo-Rak Lee, Hye Jin Kang
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Primary and Second Primary Multiple Myeloma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Yoon Jung Jang, Joonseog Kong, Heyjin Kim, Chulkue Pak, Im Il Na, Hyo-Rak Lee, Hye Jin Kang","doi":"10.1177/11795549251377882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing number of cancer survivors, second primary malignancies (SPMs) are attracting clinical interest. Although SPMs following multiple myeloma (MM) have been studied, data on second primary multiple myeloma (SPMM) remain limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SPMM with those of primary MM through a retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 183 patients with primary MM and 12 patients with SPMM treated at a single center between 2003 and 2022. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching (1:3) was performed based on age, sex, year of MM diagnosis, and International Staging System stage. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 48 patients (36 with primary MM and 12 with SPMM) were included in the final analysis. At the time of MM diagnosis, 83.3% of patients with SPMM had achieved complete remission of their primary malignancy. All but one received standard MM treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.1 months for the primary MM group and 41.5 months for the SPMM group. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with SPMM, most of whom had well-controlled primary cancers, received active treatment and demonstrated clinical outcomes not significantly different from those with primary MM. These findings support the use of aggressive treatment strategies for SPMM. Larger prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48591,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology","volume":"19 ","pages":"11795549251377882"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549251377882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the increasing number of cancer survivors, second primary malignancies (SPMs) are attracting clinical interest. Although SPMs following multiple myeloma (MM) have been studied, data on second primary multiple myeloma (SPMM) remain limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SPMM with those of primary MM through a retrospective analysis.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 183 patients with primary MM and 12 patients with SPMM treated at a single center between 2003 and 2022. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching (1:3) was performed based on age, sex, year of MM diagnosis, and International Staging System stage. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: After matching, 48 patients (36 with primary MM and 12 with SPMM) were included in the final analysis. At the time of MM diagnosis, 83.3% of patients with SPMM had achieved complete remission of their primary malignancy. All but one received standard MM treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.1 months for the primary MM group and 41.5 months for the SPMM group. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.56).

Conclusions: Patients with SPMM, most of whom had well-controlled primary cancers, received active treatment and demonstrated clinical outcomes not significantly different from those with primary MM. These findings support the use of aggressive treatment strategies for SPMM. Larger prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies.

原发和继发多发性骨髓瘤的比较分析:倾向评分匹配研究。
背景:随着癌症幸存者人数的增加,第二原发恶性肿瘤(SPMs)引起了临床的关注。虽然多发性骨髓瘤(MM)后的SPMs已经被研究过,但关于第二原发性多发性骨髓瘤(SPMM)的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在通过回顾性分析比较SPMM与原发性MM的临床特征和预后。方法:我们回顾性分析了2003年至2022年间在单一中心治疗的183例原发性MM和12例SPMM患者。为了减少选择偏差,根据年龄、性别、MM诊断年份和国际分期系统分期进行倾向评分匹配(1:3)。使用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型评估生存结果。结果:经配对后,48例(原发性MM 36例,SPMM 12例)纳入最终分析。在MM诊断时,83.3%的SPMM患者的原发恶性肿瘤完全缓解。除一人外,其余均接受标准MM治疗。原发性MM组的中位总生存期(OS)为45.1个月,SPMM组为41.5个月。两组间OS差异无统计学意义(风险比:0.72;95%可信区间:0.33 ~ 1.56)。结论:SPMM患者,大多数原发癌症控制良好,接受积极治疗,临床结果与原发MM患者无显著差异。这些发现支持SPMM积极治疗策略的使用。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来确定最佳治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on all aspects of cancer research and treatment, in addition to related genetic, pathophysiological and epidemiological topics. Of particular but not exclusive importance are molecular biology, clinical interventions, controlled trials, therapeutics, pharmacology and drug delivery, and techniques of cancer surgery. The journal welcomes unsolicited article proposals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信