Outcomes of patients undergoing elective DC cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: A district general hospital experience.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A Abdullah, G S Ramewal, C Wright, K Razzaq, K Moosavi-Shendi, G Bagri, S K Nadar
{"title":"Outcomes of patients undergoing elective DC cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: A district general hospital experience.","authors":"A Abdullah, G S Ramewal, C Wright, K Razzaq, K Moosavi-Shendi, G Bagri, S K Nadar","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DC cardioversion (DCCV), when performed early, effectively restores sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This audit aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing DCCV at our institution and assess the factors predicting restoration of sinus rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit included patients who underwent elective DCCV in 2021 at our hospital. We excluded patients where data was incomplete. Data was collected from the electronic case records of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred forty-three patients (mean age 67.5±11.7 years, 67.1% male) were included in the analysis. The median delay from DCCV decision was 265 (108-826) days. Patients who were initially managed with rate control (158 (65%) patients) had longer DCCV wait times compared to those where DCCV was considered as the first line treatment (308 vs. 114 days, p<0.001). DCCV was immediately successful in 232 (93.1%) patients, with 226 (91.5%) maintaining sinus rhythm at discharge, 120 (48.6%) at 6 months and 98 (39.7%) at one year. Fewer shocks predicted sinus rhythm maintenance at discharge, 6 months, and one year (p<0.001). Amiodarone continued post-DCCV also predicted maintenance of sinus rhythm at one year (p=0.01). No significant differences were found in demographics, risk factors, DCCV delay, or LA size between those who maintained sinus rhythm and those who reverted to AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At our institution, most patients experienced significant delays before elective cardioversion. Decision to perform DCCV should be taken early and not after an initial trial of rate control. In our patients, amiodarone helped maintain sinus rhythm after successful DCCV.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":"101167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: DC cardioversion (DCCV), when performed early, effectively restores sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This audit aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing DCCV at our institution and assess the factors predicting restoration of sinus rhythm.

Methods: This retrospective audit included patients who underwent elective DCCV in 2021 at our hospital. We excluded patients where data was incomplete. Data was collected from the electronic case records of the patients.

Results: Two hundred forty-three patients (mean age 67.5±11.7 years, 67.1% male) were included in the analysis. The median delay from DCCV decision was 265 (108-826) days. Patients who were initially managed with rate control (158 (65%) patients) had longer DCCV wait times compared to those where DCCV was considered as the first line treatment (308 vs. 114 days, p<0.001). DCCV was immediately successful in 232 (93.1%) patients, with 226 (91.5%) maintaining sinus rhythm at discharge, 120 (48.6%) at 6 months and 98 (39.7%) at one year. Fewer shocks predicted sinus rhythm maintenance at discharge, 6 months, and one year (p<0.001). Amiodarone continued post-DCCV also predicted maintenance of sinus rhythm at one year (p=0.01). No significant differences were found in demographics, risk factors, DCCV delay, or LA size between those who maintained sinus rhythm and those who reverted to AF.

Conclusion: At our institution, most patients experienced significant delays before elective cardioversion. Decision to perform DCCV should be taken early and not after an initial trial of rate control. In our patients, amiodarone helped maintain sinus rhythm after successful DCCV.

心房颤动患者择期DC复律的结果:一项地区综合医院的经验。
背景:心房颤动(AF)患者早期进行DC心律转复(DCCV)可有效恢复窦性心律。本审核旨在评估我院DCCV患者的预后,并评估预测窦性心律恢复的因素。方法:回顾性审计包括2021年在我院接受选择性DCCV的患者。我们排除了数据不完整的患者。数据收集自患者的电子病例记录。结果:纳入243例患者,平均年龄67.5±11.7岁,男性67.1%。DCCV决定的中位延迟为265(108-826)天。与将DCCV作为一线治疗方案的患者相比,最初接受率控制的患者(158例(65%))的DCCV等待时间更长(308天对114天)。结论:在我们的机构,大多数患者在选择性心脏复律之前经历了明显的延迟。执行DCCV的决定应尽早作出,而不是在费率控制的初步试验之后。在我们的患者中,胺碘酮有助于维持DCCV成功后的窦性心律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信