{"title":"Barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography for critical care: A Scottish perspective.","authors":"Helen French, Christopher Leddy, Philip McCall","doi":"10.1177/17511437251365176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Point-of-care echocardiography accreditation is not mandated within the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) training curriculum, yet it is commonly utilised to aid clinical decision making in the intensive care unit. We designed a survey to assess barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography across Scottish critical care units. The majority (70.1%) of respondents were unaccredited, with the most common barrier (<i>n</i> = 102) being 'lack of time with a mentor for supervised scanning'. This was amplified by the fact that only 25% of mentors received job planned time for scanning. Men were over-represented in those with accreditation, accounting for 61.4% of accredited clinicians, despite making up 51.0% of all respondents. In contrast, women represented 62.5% of unaccredited individuals who had undertaken at least one attempt at the process. We did not find a difference with other protected characteristics. This survey suggests that targeted support locally for those struggling to complete the process could address some of these concerns, and that further work needs to be taken to identify and address gender inequity in point of care echocardiography accreditation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251365176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251365176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Point-of-care echocardiography accreditation is not mandated within the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) training curriculum, yet it is commonly utilised to aid clinical decision making in the intensive care unit. We designed a survey to assess barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography across Scottish critical care units. The majority (70.1%) of respondents were unaccredited, with the most common barrier (n = 102) being 'lack of time with a mentor for supervised scanning'. This was amplified by the fact that only 25% of mentors received job planned time for scanning. Men were over-represented in those with accreditation, accounting for 61.4% of accredited clinicians, despite making up 51.0% of all respondents. In contrast, women represented 62.5% of unaccredited individuals who had undertaken at least one attempt at the process. We did not find a difference with other protected characteristics. This survey suggests that targeted support locally for those struggling to complete the process could address some of these concerns, and that further work needs to be taken to identify and address gender inequity in point of care echocardiography accreditation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.