Barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography for critical care: A Scottish perspective.

IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Helen French, Christopher Leddy, Philip McCall
{"title":"Barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography for critical care: A Scottish perspective.","authors":"Helen French, Christopher Leddy, Philip McCall","doi":"10.1177/17511437251365176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Point-of-care echocardiography accreditation is not mandated within the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) training curriculum, yet it is commonly utilised to aid clinical decision making in the intensive care unit. We designed a survey to assess barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography across Scottish critical care units. The majority (70.1%) of respondents were unaccredited, with the most common barrier (<i>n</i> = 102) being 'lack of time with a mentor for supervised scanning'. This was amplified by the fact that only 25% of mentors received job planned time for scanning. Men were over-represented in those with accreditation, accounting for 61.4% of accredited clinicians, despite making up 51.0% of all respondents. In contrast, women represented 62.5% of unaccredited individuals who had undertaken at least one attempt at the process. We did not find a difference with other protected characteristics. This survey suggests that targeted support locally for those struggling to complete the process could address some of these concerns, and that further work needs to be taken to identify and address gender inequity in point of care echocardiography accreditation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251365176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251365176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Point-of-care echocardiography accreditation is not mandated within the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) training curriculum, yet it is commonly utilised to aid clinical decision making in the intensive care unit. We designed a survey to assess barriers to accreditation in point-of-care echocardiography across Scottish critical care units. The majority (70.1%) of respondents were unaccredited, with the most common barrier (n = 102) being 'lack of time with a mentor for supervised scanning'. This was amplified by the fact that only 25% of mentors received job planned time for scanning. Men were over-represented in those with accreditation, accounting for 61.4% of accredited clinicians, despite making up 51.0% of all respondents. In contrast, women represented 62.5% of unaccredited individuals who had undertaken at least one attempt at the process. We did not find a difference with other protected characteristics. This survey suggests that targeted support locally for those struggling to complete the process could address some of these concerns, and that further work needs to be taken to identify and address gender inequity in point of care echocardiography accreditation.

危重症护理点超声心动图鉴定的障碍:苏格兰视角。
监护点超声心动图认证在重症监护医学系(FICM)培训课程中不是强制性的,但它通常用于帮助重症监护病房的临床决策。我们设计了一项调查,以评估苏格兰重症监护病房即时超声心动图认证的障碍。大多数(70.1%)的受访者没有获得认证,最常见的障碍(n = 102)是“没有时间与导师进行监督扫描”。只有25%的导师得到了工作计划的扫描时间,这一事实进一步放大了这一点。男性在获得认证的临床医生中比例过高,占认证临床医生的61.4%,尽管占所有受访者的51.0%。相比之下,在至少尝试过一次这一过程的未获认证的个人中,女性占62.5%。我们没有发现与其他受保护特征的差异。这项调查表明,在当地为那些努力完成这一过程的人提供有针对性的支持可以解决其中的一些问题,并且需要采取进一步的工作来识别和解决护理点超声心动图认证中的性别不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信