Exploration of Oxidative Stress Mediated Genetic Toxicology Modes of Actions Using a Pathway Analysis, Connectivity Mapping and Transcriptional Benchmark Dosing Based Framework.
K Nadira De Abrew, Bastian G Selman, Mahmoud Shobair, Xiaoling Zhang, Ashley J Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler
{"title":"Exploration of Oxidative Stress Mediated Genetic Toxicology Modes of Actions Using a Pathway Analysis, Connectivity Mapping and Transcriptional Benchmark Dosing Based Framework.","authors":"K Nadira De Abrew, Bastian G Selman, Mahmoud Shobair, Xiaoling Zhang, Ashley J Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While current genetic toxicology practices can detect downstream genotoxicity effects, such as gene mutation and double strand breaks, they are unable to detect the underlying Mode of Action (MoA) of a chemical or differentiate between direct and indirect acting genotoxicants without additional modification. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a useful tool to critically identify and evaluate MOAs and can enable subsequent quantitative dose response assessments of genotoxicity endpoints. The recently developed AOP, \"Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations\" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/296), pertains to one common genetic toxicology relevant MOA: oxidative stress. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are key to regulating many biological processes, however, when disrupted, an excess of ROS can eventually lead to DNA damage and double-strand breaks. Here, we look at 18 compounds reported to have complete or mixed oxidative stress MOAs and use a combination of genomic tools such as Pathway analysis, Connectivity mapping and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling to define a framework that can separate substances that test negative in vivo from true in vivo genotoxicants. TK6 cells were treated with the 18 compounds for 4 hours, parallel micronucleus and genomics experiments were performed, and in vitro micronucleus data were used to infer dose for genomics analysis. The resulting genomic data was analyzed using pathway analysis for hypothesis generation, these hypotheses were tested using Connectivity mapping (CMap) and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling. We demonstrate that a genomics-based workflow based on in vitro methods can be used to successfully separate in vivo genotoxicants from non genotoxicants. These methods have the potential to evolve into Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) tools that can be used for determining the contribution of the oxidative stress MoA in a predictive toxicology setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While current genetic toxicology practices can detect downstream genotoxicity effects, such as gene mutation and double strand breaks, they are unable to detect the underlying Mode of Action (MoA) of a chemical or differentiate between direct and indirect acting genotoxicants without additional modification. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a useful tool to critically identify and evaluate MOAs and can enable subsequent quantitative dose response assessments of genotoxicity endpoints. The recently developed AOP, "Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/296), pertains to one common genetic toxicology relevant MOA: oxidative stress. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are key to regulating many biological processes, however, when disrupted, an excess of ROS can eventually lead to DNA damage and double-strand breaks. Here, we look at 18 compounds reported to have complete or mixed oxidative stress MOAs and use a combination of genomic tools such as Pathway analysis, Connectivity mapping and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling to define a framework that can separate substances that test negative in vivo from true in vivo genotoxicants. TK6 cells were treated with the 18 compounds for 4 hours, parallel micronucleus and genomics experiments were performed, and in vitro micronucleus data were used to infer dose for genomics analysis. The resulting genomic data was analyzed using pathway analysis for hypothesis generation, these hypotheses were tested using Connectivity mapping (CMap) and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling. We demonstrate that a genomics-based workflow based on in vitro methods can be used to successfully separate in vivo genotoxicants from non genotoxicants. These methods have the potential to evolve into Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) tools that can be used for determining the contribution of the oxidative stress MoA in a predictive toxicology setting.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology.
The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field.
The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.