[Prognostic value of difference between hematocrit and albumin in patients with sepsis].

Q3 Medicine
Shaobo Wang, Bin Huang, Yuxin Xu, Bingyu Wei, Rongfang Long, Ying Qiu
{"title":"[Prognostic value of difference between hematocrit and albumin in patients with sepsis].","authors":"Shaobo Wang, Bin Huang, Yuxin Xu, Bingyu Wei, Rongfang Long, Ying Qiu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20250311-00234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the value of difference between hematocrit (HCT) and albumin (Alb) in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on the septic patients hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January to October in 2024. Clinical data including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension or diabetes, vital signs on admission, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, blood lactic acid (Lac), oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>), hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), lymphocyte count (LYM), HCT, Alb, difference between HCT and Alb, bilirubin, scrum creatinine (SCr), and fibrinogen (Fib) within 48 hours of admission were collected. The 28-day prognosis of patients was also recorded. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 28-day death in patients with sepsis. The predictive efficacy of the difference between HCT and Alb on 28-day death was evaluated using the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 180 enrolled septic patients, 140 survived and 40 died on 28 days. Compared with the survival group, the patients in the death group was significantly older (years old: 64±16 vs. 55±15, P < 0.05), and had higher SOFA score, APACHE II score, and SCr [SOFA score: 6 (4, 9) vs. 3 (2, 5), APACHE II score: 13 (10, 18) vs. 8 (6, 11), SCr (μmol/L): 136 (70, 416) vs. 77 (58, 126), all P < 0.05] as well as lower Hb, PLT, HCT, difference between HCT and Alb, and Fib within 48 hours of admission [Hb (g/L): 90±30 vs. 106±79, PLT (×10<sup>9</sup>/L): 158 (57, 240) vs. 215 (110, 315), HCT: 0.258±0.081 vs. 0.333±0.077, difference between HCT and Alb: -6.52±7.40 vs. 1.07±7.63, Fib (g/L): 3.72±1.57 vs. 4.59±1.55, all P < 0.05]. No significant difference in gender, BMI, history of hypertension or diabetes, vital signs on admission, or other laboratory indicators was found between the two groups. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.040, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.004-1.078, P = 0.030], APACHE II score (OR = 1.218, 95%CI was 1.038-1.430, P = 0.016), Hb (OR = 1.040, 95%CI was 1.014-1.068, P = 0.003), and difference between HCT and Alb (OR = 0.804, 95%CI was 0.727-0.889, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 28-day death of septic patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of difference between HCT and Alb for predicting 28-day death of septic patients was 0.764 (95%CI was 0.679-0.849, P < 0.001). A cut-off value of difference between HCT and Alb ≤ -5.35 yielded a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 65.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The difference between HCT and Alb at early admission is a valuable predictor of prognosis in septic patients. A difference ≤ -5.35 indicates an increased death risk of septic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":"37 7","pages":"633-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20250311-00234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of difference between hematocrit (HCT) and albumin (Alb) in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on the septic patients hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January to October in 2024. Clinical data including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension or diabetes, vital signs on admission, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, blood lactic acid (Lac), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), lymphocyte count (LYM), HCT, Alb, difference between HCT and Alb, bilirubin, scrum creatinine (SCr), and fibrinogen (Fib) within 48 hours of admission were collected. The 28-day prognosis of patients was also recorded. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 28-day death in patients with sepsis. The predictive efficacy of the difference between HCT and Alb on 28-day death was evaluated using the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve).

Results: Among 180 enrolled septic patients, 140 survived and 40 died on 28 days. Compared with the survival group, the patients in the death group was significantly older (years old: 64±16 vs. 55±15, P < 0.05), and had higher SOFA score, APACHE II score, and SCr [SOFA score: 6 (4, 9) vs. 3 (2, 5), APACHE II score: 13 (10, 18) vs. 8 (6, 11), SCr (μmol/L): 136 (70, 416) vs. 77 (58, 126), all P < 0.05] as well as lower Hb, PLT, HCT, difference between HCT and Alb, and Fib within 48 hours of admission [Hb (g/L): 90±30 vs. 106±79, PLT (×109/L): 158 (57, 240) vs. 215 (110, 315), HCT: 0.258±0.081 vs. 0.333±0.077, difference between HCT and Alb: -6.52±7.40 vs. 1.07±7.63, Fib (g/L): 3.72±1.57 vs. 4.59±1.55, all P < 0.05]. No significant difference in gender, BMI, history of hypertension or diabetes, vital signs on admission, or other laboratory indicators was found between the two groups. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.040, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.004-1.078, P = 0.030], APACHE II score (OR = 1.218, 95%CI was 1.038-1.430, P = 0.016), Hb (OR = 1.040, 95%CI was 1.014-1.068, P = 0.003), and difference between HCT and Alb (OR = 0.804, 95%CI was 0.727-0.889, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 28-day death of septic patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of difference between HCT and Alb for predicting 28-day death of septic patients was 0.764 (95%CI was 0.679-0.849, P < 0.001). A cut-off value of difference between HCT and Alb ≤ -5.35 yielded a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 65.0%.

Conclusions: The difference between HCT and Alb at early admission is a valuable predictor of prognosis in septic patients. A difference ≤ -5.35 indicates an increased death risk of septic patients.

[血比容和白蛋白在脓毒症患者中的预后价值]。
目的:探讨血比容(HCT)与白蛋白(Alb)的差异对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值。方法:对广西医科大学第一附属医院2024年1 - 10月住院的脓毒症患者进行回顾性研究。临床资料包括性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、高血压或糖尿病史、入院时生命体征、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)评分、血乳酸(Lac)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)、血红蛋白(Hb)、白细胞计数(WBC)、血小板计数(PLT)、淋巴细胞计数(LYM)、HCT、Alb、HCT与Alb的差异、胆红素、scrum肌酐(SCr)、采集入院48小时内的纤维蛋白原(Fib)。同时记录患者28天预后。采用二元多因素Logistic回归分析确定脓毒症患者28天死亡的危险因素。采用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve, ROC曲线)评价HCT与Alb差异对28天死亡的预测效果。结果:180例脓毒症患者中,存活140例,28 d死亡40例。与存活组相比,死亡组患者明显老(55岁:64±16和±15日,P < 0.05),沙发上得分较高,APACHE II评分,和可控硅沙发分数:6(4、9)和3(2、5),APACHE II评分:13(10、18)和8(6,11),可控硅(μmol / L): 136(70, 416)与77年(126),所有P < 0.05)以及降低Hb, PLT, HCT, HCT和铝青铜的区别,和Fib入院48小时内(Hb (g / L): 90±30和106±79、PLT(×109 / L):158(57, 240)比215 (110,315),HCT: 0.258±0.081比0.333±0.077,HCT与Alb的差异:-6.52±7.40比1.07±7.63,Fib (g/L): 3.72±1.57比4.59±1.55,均P < 0.05]。两组在性别、BMI、高血压或糖尿病史、入院时生命体征及其他实验室指标方面均无显著差异。二元多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄[比值比(OR) = 1.040, 95%可信区间(95% ci)为1.004 ~ 1.078,P = 0.030]、APACHEⅱ评分(OR = 1.218, 95% ci为1.038 ~ 1.430,P = 0.016)、Hb (OR = 1.040, 95% ci为1.014 ~ 1.068,P = 0.003)、HCT与Alb的差异(OR = 0.804, 95% ci为0.727 ~ 0.889,P < 0.001)是脓毒症患者28天死亡的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示,HCT与Alb预测脓毒症患者28天死亡的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)差异为0.764 (95%CI为0.679 ~ 0.849,P < 0.001)。HCT与Alb的临界值差异≤-5.35时,敏感性为80.7%,特异性为65.0%。结论:早期入院时HCT和Alb的差异是判断脓毒症患者预后的重要指标。差异≤-5.35表明脓毒症患者死亡风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信