Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes for Total Thyroidectomy/Lobectomy and Isthmusectomy in Patients with Isthmic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1177/10507256251382600
Seungho Lee, Su-Jin Kim, June Young Choi, Nanhee Park, Jayoun Kim, Yoon Kong, Hye Lim Bae, Ja Kyung Lee, Woochul Kim, Hyeong Won Yu, Young Jun Chai, Kyu Eun Lee
{"title":"Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes for Total Thyroidectomy/Lobectomy and Isthmusectomy in Patients with Isthmic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Seungho Lee, Su-Jin Kim, June Young Choi, Nanhee Park, Jayoun Kim, Yoon Kong, Hye Lim Bae, Ja Kyung Lee, Woochul Kim, Hyeong Won Yu, Young Jun Chai, Kyu Eun Lee","doi":"10.1177/10507256251382600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The optimal surgical extent for isthmus-confined papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical complications, and recurrence rates based on the extent of resection. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective cohort study included 345 patients who underwent thyroidectomy for solitary isthmus-confined PTC at two affiliated tertiary centers from 2013 to 2022. Patients were excluded if they had multifocal PTC with lobar involvement, large tumors (>4 cm), suspected extrathyroidal extension (ETE), clinically positive lymph nodes (LNs), or aggressive histological subtypes. Clinicopathological features, surgical complication rates, and recurrence rates were compared among the total thyroidectomy (TT), lobectomy (L), and isthmusectomy (I) groups. This retrospective cohort study used propensity score matching (PSM), resulting in two groups of 85 patients: TT/L and I. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 345 included patients, 89 underwent TT, 30 underwent L, and 226 underwent I. After PSM, 170 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 48.2 years, and the mean tumor size was 0.8 cm. Microcarcinoma accounted for 71.8% of cases. The rates of ETE (65.3%), multifocality (9.4%), <i>BRAF</i> mutation (75.3%), and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (19.4%) were observed without significant differences between the TT/L and I groups. Risk stratification for central LN metastasis showed no significant difference (high-risk: 21.2% vs. 27.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.353). No recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in either group during a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Median follow-up was longer in the TT/L group (6.1 years [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-8.5] vs. 3.6 years [IQR: 2.1-4.9], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Major complications were more frequent in TT/L group: transient/permanent hypocalcemia (14.1%/1.2% vs. 0%/0%) and transient vocal cord palsy (3.5% vs. 0%). Levothyroxine dependency was significantly higher in the TT/L group in terms of usage (90.6% vs. 34.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), average administered dose (85.5 ± 45.1 µg vs. 21.9 ± 33.2 µg, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and duration (5.2 ± 3.1 years vs. 0.9 ± 1.3 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Newly noted thyroid lesions occurred more frequently in the I group (1.3% vs. 10.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.039). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Isthmusectomy may be considered for carefully selected patients with isthmus-confined PTC. Validation in long-term prospective studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10507256251382600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical extent for isthmus-confined papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, surgical complications, and recurrence rates based on the extent of resection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 345 patients who underwent thyroidectomy for solitary isthmus-confined PTC at two affiliated tertiary centers from 2013 to 2022. Patients were excluded if they had multifocal PTC with lobar involvement, large tumors (>4 cm), suspected extrathyroidal extension (ETE), clinically positive lymph nodes (LNs), or aggressive histological subtypes. Clinicopathological features, surgical complication rates, and recurrence rates were compared among the total thyroidectomy (TT), lobectomy (L), and isthmusectomy (I) groups. This retrospective cohort study used propensity score matching (PSM), resulting in two groups of 85 patients: TT/L and I. Results: Among the 345 included patients, 89 underwent TT, 30 underwent L, and 226 underwent I. After PSM, 170 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 48.2 years, and the mean tumor size was 0.8 cm. Microcarcinoma accounted for 71.8% of cases. The rates of ETE (65.3%), multifocality (9.4%), BRAF mutation (75.3%), and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (19.4%) were observed without significant differences between the TT/L and I groups. Risk stratification for central LN metastasis showed no significant difference (high-risk: 21.2% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.353). No recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in either group during a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Median follow-up was longer in the TT/L group (6.1 years [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-8.5] vs. 3.6 years [IQR: 2.1-4.9], p < 0.001). Major complications were more frequent in TT/L group: transient/permanent hypocalcemia (14.1%/1.2% vs. 0%/0%) and transient vocal cord palsy (3.5% vs. 0%). Levothyroxine dependency was significantly higher in the TT/L group in terms of usage (90.6% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001), average administered dose (85.5 ± 45.1 µg vs. 21.9 ± 33.2 µg, p < 0.001), and duration (5.2 ± 3.1 years vs. 0.9 ± 1.3 years, p < 0.001). Newly noted thyroid lesions occurred more frequently in the I group (1.3% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.039). Conclusions: Isthmusectomy may be considered for carefully selected patients with isthmus-confined PTC. Validation in long-term prospective studies is warranted.

全甲状腺切除术/肺叶切除术与峡部切除术治疗峡部乳头状癌的临床效果比较研究。
背景:峡部局限性甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的最佳手术范围尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估临床病理特征,手术并发症和复发率基于切除的程度。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2013年至2022年在两家附属三级中心接受甲状腺切除术治疗孤立峡局限性PTC的345例患者。如果患者有多灶性PTC伴肺叶受累、大肿瘤(bbb4cm)、疑似甲状腺外展(ETE)、临床阳性淋巴结(LNs)或侵袭性组织学亚型,则排除。比较甲状腺全切除术(TT)组、肺叶切除术(L)组和峡部切除术(I)组的临床病理特征、手术并发症发生率和复发率。本研究采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行回顾性队列研究,共分为两组,共85例患者:TT/L组和i组。结果:345例纳入的患者中,TT 89例,L 30例,i 226例。平均年龄48.2岁,平均肿瘤大小0.8 cm。微癌占71.8%。TT/L组和I组之间的te(65.3%)、多灶性(9.4%)、BRAF突变(75.3%)和桥本甲状腺炎(19.4%)发生率无显著差异。中枢性淋巴结转移的危险分层无显著差异(高危:21.2% vs. 27.1%, p = 0.353)。在中位随访4.3年期间,两组均未观察到复发或远处转移。TT/L组的中位随访时间更长(6.1年[四分位数间距(IQR): 4.0-8.5] vs. 3.6年[IQR: 2.1-4.9], p < 0.001)。TT/L组的主要并发症更为常见:一过性/永久性低钙血症(14.1%/1.2%比0%/0%)和一过性声带麻痹(3.5%比0%)。TT/L组左旋甲状腺素依赖性在使用量(90.6% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001)、平均给药剂量(85.5±45.1µg vs. 21.9±33.2µg, p < 0.001)和持续时间(5.2±3.1年vs. 0.9±1.3年,p < 0.001)方面均显著高于TT/L组。新发现的甲状腺病变在I组发生率更高(1.3%比10.6%,p = 0.039)。结论:对于精心挑选的峡部局限性PTC患者,可以考虑峡部切除术。在长期前瞻性研究中验证是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信