Prospective Assessment of Changes in Target Vessel Peak Systolic Velocity Measurements After Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Titia A L Sulzer, Thanila A Macedo, Thomas Mesnard, Emanuel R Tenorio, Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa Lima, Heather Hatz, Gina K Hesley, Alexander Lekah, Tiziano Tallarita, Ying Huang, Bernardo C Mendes, Gustavo S Oderich
{"title":"Prospective Assessment of Changes in Target Vessel Peak Systolic Velocity Measurements After Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair.","authors":"Titia A L Sulzer, Thanila A Macedo, Thomas Mesnard, Emanuel R Tenorio, Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa Lima, Heather Hatz, Gina K Hesley, Alexander Lekah, Tiziano Tallarita, Ying Huang, Bernardo C Mendes, Gustavo S Oderich","doi":"10.1177/15266028251368250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Target vessel stenosis or occlusion is a common indication for secondary intervention after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair requiring long-term imaging surveillance including duplex ultrasound (DUS). This study aimed to describe and compare longitudinal changes in peak systolic velocity (PSV) measurements for renal and mesenteric arteries targeted by directional branches (DBs) or reinforced fenestrations (RFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized study (2013-2020) had DUS of celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, and renal arteries (RAs) obtained preoperatively, at 6 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and annually. Vessels with preprocedural stenosis were excluded. Outcomes were variations in PSV over time for target vessels incorporated by DBs or RFs, differences in balloon-expandable stent-grafts (BESGs) and self-expandable stent-grafts (SESGs), PSV measurements prior to secondary interventions related to vessel stenosis, and a predictive value of PSV for stenosis requiring secondary intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 419 patients (292 male, mean age 74 ± 8 years old) were enrolled, with 1,311 target vessels analyzed preoperatively, including 607 mesenteric and 704 RAs. Over a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7-36), PSV measurements decreased in the first 6 to 8 weeks after DB incorporation, remained stable, followed by a nonsignificant increase at 5 years. PSV increased in the first 6 months using RFs with postoperative velocities significantly higher (<i>P</i> < .05) for RFs compared to DBs. Branched mesenteric vessels stented with BESGs had higher velocities than SESGs (<i>P</i> < .05). Of the 23 target vessels treated by secondary intervention for stenosis, 19 (83%) had velocities above the thresholds for native, nonstented vessels. Furthermore, in RAs (n = 20) PSV effectively predicted clinically relevant stenosis, AUC was 0.98, with a 231 cm/s threshold offering 84% sensitivity with 100% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longitudinal follow-up shows that velocity changes vary depending on the type of incorporation, vessel, and bridging stent. For DBs, PSV decreased initially, stabilized, and showed a nonsignificant increase at 5 years. In contrast, PSV increased with RFs and remained higher than DBs. Despite these variations, velocities remained below established thresholds for clinically significant stenosis in nonstented vessels. Criteria for in-stent stenosis may differ, and PSV alone should not be the sole indicator for reintervention.Clinical ImpactThis study provides new insight into duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance after fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR). Peak systolic velocity (PSV) trends differed between fenestrations and branches, and stent type influenced flow dynamics. Importantly, most vessels with secondary interventions had elevated PSVs, but many others exceeded native stenosis thresholds without clinical consequence. Despite these variations, velocities remained below established thresholds for clinically significant stenosis in non-stented vessels. Criteria for in-stent stenosis may differ, and PSV alone should not be the sole indicator for reintervention.The reported PSV measurements served as a benchmark for DUS surveillance following FB-EVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251368250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251368250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Target vessel stenosis or occlusion is a common indication for secondary intervention after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair requiring long-term imaging surveillance including duplex ultrasound (DUS). This study aimed to describe and compare longitudinal changes in peak systolic velocity (PSV) measurements for renal and mesenteric arteries targeted by directional branches (DBs) or reinforced fenestrations (RFs).

Methods: Patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized study (2013-2020) had DUS of celiac axis, superior mesenteric artery, and renal arteries (RAs) obtained preoperatively, at 6 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and annually. Vessels with preprocedural stenosis were excluded. Outcomes were variations in PSV over time for target vessels incorporated by DBs or RFs, differences in balloon-expandable stent-grafts (BESGs) and self-expandable stent-grafts (SESGs), PSV measurements prior to secondary interventions related to vessel stenosis, and a predictive value of PSV for stenosis requiring secondary intervention.

Results: A total of 419 patients (292 male, mean age 74 ± 8 years old) were enrolled, with 1,311 target vessels analyzed preoperatively, including 607 mesenteric and 704 RAs. Over a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7-36), PSV measurements decreased in the first 6 to 8 weeks after DB incorporation, remained stable, followed by a nonsignificant increase at 5 years. PSV increased in the first 6 months using RFs with postoperative velocities significantly higher (P < .05) for RFs compared to DBs. Branched mesenteric vessels stented with BESGs had higher velocities than SESGs (P < .05). Of the 23 target vessels treated by secondary intervention for stenosis, 19 (83%) had velocities above the thresholds for native, nonstented vessels. Furthermore, in RAs (n = 20) PSV effectively predicted clinically relevant stenosis, AUC was 0.98, with a 231 cm/s threshold offering 84% sensitivity with 100% specificity.

Conclusion: Longitudinal follow-up shows that velocity changes vary depending on the type of incorporation, vessel, and bridging stent. For DBs, PSV decreased initially, stabilized, and showed a nonsignificant increase at 5 years. In contrast, PSV increased with RFs and remained higher than DBs. Despite these variations, velocities remained below established thresholds for clinically significant stenosis in nonstented vessels. Criteria for in-stent stenosis may differ, and PSV alone should not be the sole indicator for reintervention.Clinical ImpactThis study provides new insight into duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance after fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR). Peak systolic velocity (PSV) trends differed between fenestrations and branches, and stent type influenced flow dynamics. Importantly, most vessels with secondary interventions had elevated PSVs, but many others exceeded native stenosis thresholds without clinical consequence. Despite these variations, velocities remained below established thresholds for clinically significant stenosis in non-stented vessels. Criteria for in-stent stenosis may differ, and PSV alone should not be the sole indicator for reintervention.The reported PSV measurements served as a benchmark for DUS surveillance following FB-EVAR.

开窗分支血管内主动脉修复后靶血管峰值收缩速度测量变化的前瞻性评估。
目的:靶血管狭窄或闭塞是开窗分支血管内主动脉修复术后继发干预的常见指征,需要包括双工超声(DUS)在内的长期影像学监测。本研究旨在描述和比较定向分支(DBs)或强化开窗(RFs)靶向肾动脉和肠系膜动脉的峰值收缩速度(PSV)测量的纵向变化。方法:纳入前瞻性非随机研究(2013-2020)的患者术前、6 - 8周、6个月和每年分别获得腹腔轴、肠系膜上动脉和肾动脉(RAs) DUS。手术前狭窄的血管被排除。结果是经DBs或RFs合并的靶血管PSV随时间的变化,球囊可扩张支架移植物(besg)和自扩张支架移植物(sesg)的差异,与血管狭窄相关的二次干预前PSV测量,以及PSV对需要二次干预的狭窄的预测价值。结果:共纳入419例患者(男性292例,平均年龄74±8岁),术前分析靶血管1311条,其中肠系膜血管607条,RAs血管704条。在中位23个月的随访中(四分位间距[IQR], 7-36), PSV测量值在DB合并后的前6至8周下降,保持稳定,随后在5年无显著增加。结论:纵向随访显示,速度的变化取决于入路、血管和桥式支架的类型。对于DBs, PSV最初下降,稳定,并在5年时显示不显著的增加。相比之下,PSV随着RFs的增加而增加,并保持高于DBs。尽管存在这些变化,流速仍低于非支架血管临床显著狭窄的既定阈值。支架内狭窄的标准可能不同,PSV不应该是再介入的唯一指标。本研究为开窗和分支血管内动脉瘤修复(FB-EVAR)术后双工超声(DUS)监测提供了新的见解。峰值收缩速度(PSV)趋势在开窗和支路之间存在差异,支架类型影响血流动力学。重要的是,大多数接受二次干预的血管psv升高,但许多其他血管超过了固有的狭窄阈值,但没有临床后果。尽管存在这些变化,流速仍低于非支架血管临床显著狭窄的既定阈值。支架内狭窄的标准可能不同,PSV不应该是再介入的唯一指标。报告的PSV测量值可作为FB-EVAR后DUS监测的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信