Maintenance therapy-a potential strategy to prolong the survival of advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251377584
Ming-Jing Lee, Yeh Chen Lee, Prabhat Bhargava, Zola Chia-Chen Li, Tom Wei-Wu Chen
{"title":"Maintenance therapy-a potential strategy to prolong the survival of advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients.","authors":"Ming-Jing Lee, Yeh Chen Lee, Prabhat Bhargava, Zola Chia-Chen Li, Tom Wei-Wu Chen","doi":"10.1177/17588359251377584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of first-line systemic treatment for most subtypes of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, cumulative cardiotoxicity and a decline in quality of life limit the treatment duration of free-form anthracycline, restricting its long-term benefits. Maintenance therapy-defined as the continuation of a less toxic systemic treatment following initial disease control-includes two main strategies: continuation maintenance and switch maintenance. Continuation maintenance involves the extended use of the same agent or one with a similar mechanism of action to preserve the efficacy of the prior treatment while minimizing the toxicities. By contrast, switch maintenance uses a different, potentially less toxic agent to extend disease control after prior treatment. Both approaches are established in other solid tumors and have been explored in STS. The LMS-04 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with doxorubicin plus trabectedin induction followed by trabectedin maintenance in leiomyosarcoma patients. However, this strategy is limited to leiomyosarcoma patients who received first-line doxorubicin plus trabectedin and is associated with high-grade toxicity (grade 3/4 adverse events in 97% of patients). Switch maintenance strategies, such as ridaforolimus and regorafenib, have limitations in efficacy and tolerability, preventing their widespread adoption. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a liposome-encapsulated formulation of doxorubicin, offers a potential continuation maintenance option. With a similar mechanism of action to free-form anthracycline but reduced cumulative cardiac toxicity, PLD may be both effective and better tolerated in STS patients who have derived benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy. A clinical trial investigating continuation maintenance PLD in this patient population is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251377584"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251377584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of first-line systemic treatment for most subtypes of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, cumulative cardiotoxicity and a decline in quality of life limit the treatment duration of free-form anthracycline, restricting its long-term benefits. Maintenance therapy-defined as the continuation of a less toxic systemic treatment following initial disease control-includes two main strategies: continuation maintenance and switch maintenance. Continuation maintenance involves the extended use of the same agent or one with a similar mechanism of action to preserve the efficacy of the prior treatment while minimizing the toxicities. By contrast, switch maintenance uses a different, potentially less toxic agent to extend disease control after prior treatment. Both approaches are established in other solid tumors and have been explored in STS. The LMS-04 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with doxorubicin plus trabectedin induction followed by trabectedin maintenance in leiomyosarcoma patients. However, this strategy is limited to leiomyosarcoma patients who received first-line doxorubicin plus trabectedin and is associated with high-grade toxicity (grade 3/4 adverse events in 97% of patients). Switch maintenance strategies, such as ridaforolimus and regorafenib, have limitations in efficacy and tolerability, preventing their widespread adoption. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a liposome-encapsulated formulation of doxorubicin, offers a potential continuation maintenance option. With a similar mechanism of action to free-form anthracycline but reduced cumulative cardiac toxicity, PLD may be both effective and better tolerated in STS patients who have derived benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy. A clinical trial investigating continuation maintenance PLD in this patient population is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

维持治疗-延长晚期软组织肉瘤患者生存期的潜在策略。
蒽环类化疗仍然是大多数晚期软组织肉瘤(STS)亚型的一线全身治疗的基石。然而,累积的心脏毒性和生活质量的下降限制了自由形式蒽环类药物的治疗时间,限制了其长期获益。维持治疗-定义为在初始疾病控制后继续进行毒性较小的全身治疗-包括两种主要策略:继续维持和开关维持。继续维持包括延长使用同一药物或具有类似作用机制的药物,以保持先前治疗的疗效,同时尽量减少毒性。相比之下,开关维护使用一种不同的、潜在毒性较小的药物来延长先前治疗后的疾病控制。这两种方法已在其他实体肿瘤中建立,并已在STS中进行了探索。LMS-04试验表明,在平滑肌肉瘤患者中,阿霉素加trabectedin诱导后再维持trabectedin可改善预后。然而,该策略仅限于接受一线阿霉素加trabectedin治疗的平滑肌肉瘤患者,并且与高度毒性相关(97%的患者出现3/4级不良事件)。切换维持策略,如瑞达福莫司和瑞非尼,在疗效和耐受性方面有局限性,阻碍了它们的广泛采用。聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素(PLD)是一种脂质体封装的阿霉素制剂,提供了一种潜在的持续维持选择。PLD与自由形式的蒽环类药物具有相似的作用机制,但减少了累积的心脏毒性,对于从蒽环类药物化疗中获益的STS患者来说,PLD可能既有效又耐受性更好。有必要对该患者群体进行持续维持性PLD的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信