A Scoping Review of RCT Studies on Community Health Worker Effectiveness.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gilbert Gimm, Carolyn Hoffman, Leila Elahi, Len M Nichols
{"title":"A Scoping Review of RCT Studies on Community Health Worker Effectiveness.","authors":"Gilbert Gimm, Carolyn Hoffman, Leila Elahi, Len M Nichols","doi":"10.1177/19427891251384659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community health workers (CHW) play a unique role as trusted frontline public health workers who connect underserved populations with health and social services. In addition, CHWs have local insights on underserved patients and families, which can help to reduce information gaps and enhance the capacity of health care systems to understand health-related social needs. However, prior reviews have included studies of varying quality, which makes it difficult to assess rigorous evidence from randomized control trial (RCT) studies. Also, many CHW intervention studies do not clearly specify in which organizational setting a CHW is employed. This scoping review of US studies published in the peer-reviewed literature from 2000 to 2023 focuses on RCT studies of CHW interventions by type of organization. A total of 39 studies met all inclusion criteria. Most RCT studies were conducted in health care systems and among safety-net providers, including community health centers. However, only a handful of rigorous RCT studies of CHW interventions were conducted in public health agencies or payer settings (managed care organizations). Overall, most RCT studies of CHW interventions found consistent evidence of improved outcomes. Health care organizations can enhance their efforts to address resource gaps by hiring CHWs or partnering with organizations that employ CHWs. Finally, future RCT studies on CHWs employed by health plans (payers) or public health agencies are needed to bolster the growing body of rigorous evidence that CHWs are highly effective in improving patient outcomes across multiple organizational settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427891251384659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community health workers (CHW) play a unique role as trusted frontline public health workers who connect underserved populations with health and social services. In addition, CHWs have local insights on underserved patients and families, which can help to reduce information gaps and enhance the capacity of health care systems to understand health-related social needs. However, prior reviews have included studies of varying quality, which makes it difficult to assess rigorous evidence from randomized control trial (RCT) studies. Also, many CHW intervention studies do not clearly specify in which organizational setting a CHW is employed. This scoping review of US studies published in the peer-reviewed literature from 2000 to 2023 focuses on RCT studies of CHW interventions by type of organization. A total of 39 studies met all inclusion criteria. Most RCT studies were conducted in health care systems and among safety-net providers, including community health centers. However, only a handful of rigorous RCT studies of CHW interventions were conducted in public health agencies or payer settings (managed care organizations). Overall, most RCT studies of CHW interventions found consistent evidence of improved outcomes. Health care organizations can enhance their efforts to address resource gaps by hiring CHWs or partnering with organizations that employ CHWs. Finally, future RCT studies on CHWs employed by health plans (payers) or public health agencies are needed to bolster the growing body of rigorous evidence that CHWs are highly effective in improving patient outcomes across multiple organizational settings.

社区卫生工作者有效性的RCT研究的范围综述。
社区卫生工作者作为值得信赖的一线公共卫生工作者发挥着独特的作用,他们将服务不足的人群与卫生和社会服务联系起来。此外,卫生保健员对服务不足的病人和家庭有深入的了解,这有助于减少信息差距,提高卫生保健系统了解与健康有关的社会需求的能力。然而,先前的综述包括不同质量的研究,这使得很难评估随机对照试验(RCT)研究的严格证据。此外,许多CHW干预研究没有明确规定在哪个组织环境中雇用CHW。本研究对2000年至2023年发表在同行评议文献中的美国研究进行了范围审查,重点是按组织类型进行的CHW干预的RCT研究。共有39项研究符合所有纳入标准。大多数随机对照试验研究是在卫生保健系统和包括社区卫生中心在内的安全网提供者中进行的。然而,在公共卫生机构或付款人环境(管理式医疗组织)中,只有少数严格的卫生保健干预措施的随机对照试验研究。总的来说,大多数关于CHW干预的RCT研究都发现了改善结果的一致证据。卫生保健组织可以通过雇用卫生保健员或与雇用卫生保健员的组织合作来加强解决资源缺口的努力。最后,未来需要对健康计划(支付方)或公共卫生机构雇用的卫生保健员进行随机对照试验研究,以支持越来越多的严格证据,证明卫生保健员在改善多个组织环境中的患者预后方面非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信