Onlay Fixation With an All-Suture Anchor Provides Sufficient Biomechanical Stability for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-26 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251363607
Marcos D Tejada, Rachel M Frank, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks, Brian C Werner
{"title":"Onlay Fixation With an All-Suture Anchor Provides Sufficient Biomechanical Stability for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.","authors":"Marcos D Tejada, Rachel M Frank, Oliver L Hauck, Coen A Wijdicks, Brian C Werner","doi":"10.1177/23259671251363607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spiked ligament staples (SLSs) and biocomposite suture anchors (BSAs) are commonly used onlay fixation devices for modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). However, hardware prominence, tunnel penetration, footprint size, and irritation are documented issues. Knotless all-suture anchors (ASAs) are a promising alternative that mitigates these issues.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the biomechanical behavior of LET using ASAs with SLSs and BSAs under simulated anterolateral forces.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human iliotibial band grafts were harvested, whipstitched, and fixed onto fresh-frozen porcine femurs using ASAs, SLSs, or BSAs (n = 6/group). Each femur was placed in a custom fixture at the base of an electromechanical testing machine, oriented at 60° with iliotibial band grafts parallel to the load axis. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing were performed. Five millimeters of displacement was determined as the critical threshold for failure and survivorship analysis. Biomechanical outcomes included cyclic displacement, survivorship, and ultimate load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cyclic displacement values after all load ranges were 4.25 ± 0.28 mm, 3.94 ± 0.71 mm, and 8.14 ± 1.68 mm for ASA, SLS, and BSA, respectively. No significant differences in cyclic displacement were found between ASA and SLS, whereas significant differences were found in each load range between BSA and both ASA and SLS (<i>P</i> < .05). Survivorship was 100% for ASA, 83% for SLS, and 0% for BSA. The ultimate loads were 257 ± 40 N, 300 ± 47 N, and 205 ± 24 N for ASA, SLS, and BSA, respectively; only SLS and BSA were significantly different (<i>P</i> = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASA onlay fixation for LET demonstrated comparable displacement to SLS and significantly lower displacement to BSA with greater survival during cyclic loading. ASA had comparable failure loading, with all groups exceeding the native anterolateral ligament failure load requirements. Therefore, ASA is a biomechanically viable alternative to SLS and BSA for iliotibial band fixation during LET.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>ASAs are a biomechanically viable alternative to spiked staples and biocomposite suture anchors for LET onlay fixation, potentially mitigating complications associated with conventional techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 9","pages":"23259671251363607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251363607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spiked ligament staples (SLSs) and biocomposite suture anchors (BSAs) are commonly used onlay fixation devices for modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). However, hardware prominence, tunnel penetration, footprint size, and irritation are documented issues. Knotless all-suture anchors (ASAs) are a promising alternative that mitigates these issues.

Purpose: To compare the biomechanical behavior of LET using ASAs with SLSs and BSAs under simulated anterolateral forces.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Human iliotibial band grafts were harvested, whipstitched, and fixed onto fresh-frozen porcine femurs using ASAs, SLSs, or BSAs (n = 6/group). Each femur was placed in a custom fixture at the base of an electromechanical testing machine, oriented at 60° with iliotibial band grafts parallel to the load axis. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing were performed. Five millimeters of displacement was determined as the critical threshold for failure and survivorship analysis. Biomechanical outcomes included cyclic displacement, survivorship, and ultimate load.

Results: Cyclic displacement values after all load ranges were 4.25 ± 0.28 mm, 3.94 ± 0.71 mm, and 8.14 ± 1.68 mm for ASA, SLS, and BSA, respectively. No significant differences in cyclic displacement were found between ASA and SLS, whereas significant differences were found in each load range between BSA and both ASA and SLS (P < .05). Survivorship was 100% for ASA, 83% for SLS, and 0% for BSA. The ultimate loads were 257 ± 40 N, 300 ± 47 N, and 205 ± 24 N for ASA, SLS, and BSA, respectively; only SLS and BSA were significantly different (P = .002).

Conclusion: ASA onlay fixation for LET demonstrated comparable displacement to SLS and significantly lower displacement to BSA with greater survival during cyclic loading. ASA had comparable failure loading, with all groups exceeding the native anterolateral ligament failure load requirements. Therefore, ASA is a biomechanically viable alternative to SLS and BSA for iliotibial band fixation during LET.

Clinical relevance: ASAs are a biomechanically viable alternative to spiked staples and biocomposite suture anchors for LET onlay fixation, potentially mitigating complications associated with conventional techniques.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

采用全缝线锚钉的凸骨固定为外侧关节外肌腱固定术提供了足够的生物力学稳定性。
背景:刺状韧带钉(SLSs)和生物复合缝合锚钉(BSAs)是改良Lemaire外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)常用的内固定装置。然而,硬件突出、隧道穿透、足迹大小和刺激都是记录在案的问题。无结全缝合锚定(ASAs)是一种很有前途的替代方案,可以减轻这些问题。目的:比较asa与SLSs和bsa在模拟前外侧力作用下LET的生物力学行为。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:采集人髂胫带移植物,用asa、sls或bsa固定在新鲜冷冻猪股骨上(n = 6/组)。每个股骨被放置在机电试验机底部的定制夹具中,定位为60°,髂胫束移植物平行于负载轴。进行了循环加载和加载至失效试验。5毫米的位移被确定为失败和生存分析的临界阈值。生物力学结果包括循环位移、存活时间和极限载荷。结果:ASA、SLS和BSA的循环位移值分别为4.25±0.28 mm、3.94±0.71 mm和8.14±1.68 mm。ASA和SLS在循环位移上无显著差异,而在各载荷范围内,ASA和SLS与BSA均有显著差异(P < 0.05)。ASA的存活率为100%,SLS为83%,BSA为0%。ASA、SLS和BSA的极限负荷分别为257±40 N、300±47 N和205±24 N;只有SLS和BSA差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。结论:在循环加载过程中,ASA仅固定LET具有与SLS相当的位移和明显更低的BSA位移,并且具有更高的存活率。ASA有相似的失效载荷,所有组都超过了原前外侧韧带失效载荷要求。因此,ASA是一种生物力学上可行的替代SLS和BSA的髂胫带固定在LET。临床意义:asa是一种生物力学上可行的替代钉钉和生物复合缝合锚钉用于LET内固定,潜在地减轻了与传统技术相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信