Ethical considerations in infectious disease modelling for public health policy: the case of school closures.

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Diego S Silva, Sara Y Del Valle, Michael John Plank
{"title":"Ethical considerations in infectious disease modelling for public health policy: the case of school closures.","authors":"Diego S Silva, Sara Y Del Valle, Michael John Plank","doi":"10.1098/rsfs.2025.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mathematical models of infectious diseases are frequently used as a tool to support public health policy and decisions around the implementation of interventions such as school closures. However, most publications on policy-relevant modelling lack an ethical framework and do not explicitly consider the ethical implications of the work. This creates a risk that the unintended consequences of interventions are overlooked or that models are used to justify decisions that are inconsistent with public health ethics. In this article, we focus on the case study of school closures as a commonly modelled intervention against pandemic influenza, COVID-19 and other infectious disease threats. We briefly review some of the key concepts in public health ethics and describe approaches to modelling the effects of school closures. We then identify a series of ethical considerations involved in modelling school closures. These include accounting for population heterogeneity and inequalities; including a diversity of viewpoints and expertise in model design; considering the distribution of benefits and harms; and model transparency and contextualization. We conclude with some recommendations to ensure that policy-relevant modelling is consistent with some key ethics values.</p>","PeriodicalId":13795,"journal":{"name":"Interface Focus","volume":"15 4","pages":"20250005"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interface Focus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2025.0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mathematical models of infectious diseases are frequently used as a tool to support public health policy and decisions around the implementation of interventions such as school closures. However, most publications on policy-relevant modelling lack an ethical framework and do not explicitly consider the ethical implications of the work. This creates a risk that the unintended consequences of interventions are overlooked or that models are used to justify decisions that are inconsistent with public health ethics. In this article, we focus on the case study of school closures as a commonly modelled intervention against pandemic influenza, COVID-19 and other infectious disease threats. We briefly review some of the key concepts in public health ethics and describe approaches to modelling the effects of school closures. We then identify a series of ethical considerations involved in modelling school closures. These include accounting for population heterogeneity and inequalities; including a diversity of viewpoints and expertise in model design; considering the distribution of benefits and harms; and model transparency and contextualization. We conclude with some recommendations to ensure that policy-relevant modelling is consistent with some key ethics values.

公共卫生政策传染病建模中的伦理考虑:学校关闭的案例。
传染病的数学模型经常被用作一种工具,以支持围绕实施诸如关闭学校等干预措施的公共卫生政策和决定。然而,大多数关于政策相关建模的出版物缺乏伦理框架,也没有明确考虑这项工作的伦理含义。这就造成了一种风险,即干预措施的意外后果被忽视,或者模型被用来为不符合公共卫生伦理的决定辩护。在本文中,我们重点研究了学校关闭作为一种常见的模拟干预措施来应对大流行性流感、COVID-19和其他传染病威胁的案例。我们简要回顾了公共卫生伦理学中的一些关键概念,并描述了对学校关闭的影响进行建模的方法。然后,我们确定了一系列涉及模拟学校关闭的道德考虑因素。这包括考虑人口异质性和不平等;包括模型设计方面的多种观点和专业知识;考虑利益与损害的分配;模型透明度和情境化。最后,我们提出了一些建议,以确保与政策相关的建模与一些关键的道德价值观保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interface Focus
Interface Focus BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each Interface Focus themed issue is devoted to a particular subject at the interface of the physical and life sciences. Formed of high-quality articles, they aim to facilitate cross-disciplinary research across this traditional divide by acting as a forum accessible to all. Topics may be newly emerging areas of research or dynamic aspects of more established fields. Organisers of each Interface Focus are strongly encouraged to contextualise the journal within their chosen subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信