Investigation of GSDME results in the identification of the first pathogenic synonymous variants and genotype-phenotype correlations.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Joseph J Chin, W Daniel Walls, Kai Wang, Amanda M Odell, Diana L Kolbe, Kevin T A Booth, Hela Azaiez, Richard J H Smith
{"title":"Investigation of GSDME results in the identification of the first pathogenic synonymous variants and genotype-phenotype correlations.","authors":"Joseph J Chin, W Daniel Walls, Kai Wang, Amanda M Odell, Diana L Kolbe, Kevin T A Booth, Hela Azaiez, Richard J H Smith","doi":"10.1007/s00439-025-02782-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite advances in the genetic diagnosis of hearing loss, there remains room for improvement. One way to improve the genetic diagnostic rate is the proper assessment of synonymous variants that are often bioinformatically filtered out. We used GSDME as a model to demonstrate the importance of assessing synonymous variants. Variants in the gene GSDME (also known as DFNA5) are associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. The hearing loss is typically progressive and downsloping. All reported causative variants of GSDME-related hearing loss involve the skipping of exon 8, which results in the expression of a constitutively active, but truncated protein that induces apoptosis of cochlear hair cells. A retrospective search of previously tested patients identified 3 novel pathogenic synonymous GSDME variants. The functional impact of these variants was confirmed in vitro via a minigene splicing assay. We also observed variant-dependent differences in the levels of aberrant splicing, leading us to hypothesize that partial loss of splicing will result in a less severe hearing loss phenotype as compared to complete loss of splicing. Audiometric analysis found an association between complete loss of splicing and greater initial and/or more quickly progressing hearing loss as compared to partial loss of splicing. Over the course of the study, we also found limited correlation between in silico prediction and in vitro observed effects of a variant on splicing, indicating the need to cautiously apply in silico prediction tools in the context of genetic diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02782-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advances in the genetic diagnosis of hearing loss, there remains room for improvement. One way to improve the genetic diagnostic rate is the proper assessment of synonymous variants that are often bioinformatically filtered out. We used GSDME as a model to demonstrate the importance of assessing synonymous variants. Variants in the gene GSDME (also known as DFNA5) are associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. The hearing loss is typically progressive and downsloping. All reported causative variants of GSDME-related hearing loss involve the skipping of exon 8, which results in the expression of a constitutively active, but truncated protein that induces apoptosis of cochlear hair cells. A retrospective search of previously tested patients identified 3 novel pathogenic synonymous GSDME variants. The functional impact of these variants was confirmed in vitro via a minigene splicing assay. We also observed variant-dependent differences in the levels of aberrant splicing, leading us to hypothesize that partial loss of splicing will result in a less severe hearing loss phenotype as compared to complete loss of splicing. Audiometric analysis found an association between complete loss of splicing and greater initial and/or more quickly progressing hearing loss as compared to partial loss of splicing. Over the course of the study, we also found limited correlation between in silico prediction and in vitro observed effects of a variant on splicing, indicating the need to cautiously apply in silico prediction tools in the context of genetic diagnosis.

GSDME的研究结果鉴定了第一个致病同义变异体和基因型-表型相关性。
尽管在听力损失的基因诊断方面取得了进展,但仍有改进的余地。提高遗传诊断率的一种方法是对经常被生物信息过滤掉的同义变异进行适当的评估。我们使用GSDME作为模型来演示评估同义变体的重要性。基因GSDME(也称为DFNA5)的变异与常染色体显性非综合征性听力损失有关。听力损失通常是进行性和下坡性的。所有报道的gsdme相关听力损失的致病变异都涉及外显子8的跳跃,这导致一个组成活性的表达,但截断的蛋白诱导耳蜗毛细胞凋亡。对先前检测的患者进行回顾性搜索,发现了3种新的致病同义GSDME变体。这些变异的功能影响在体外通过迷你基因剪接试验得到证实。我们还观察到异常剪接水平的变异依赖差异,这使我们假设剪接的部分缺失会导致听力损失表型较轻,而完全剪接的缺失会导致听力损失表型较轻。听力分析发现,与部分剪接丧失相比,完全剪接丧失与更严重的初始和/或更迅速的进展性听力损失之间存在关联。在研究过程中,我们还发现计算机预测与体外观察到的变体剪接效应之间存在有限的相关性,这表明需要谨慎地将计算机预测工具应用于遗传诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Genetics
Human Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
94
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology. Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted. The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信