Assessing blood culture appropriateness in solid organ transplant recipients: a diagnostic stewardship approach.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Julie M Steinbrink, Nitin Mehdiratta, Heather Pena, Ian Welsby, Amanda Seidenfeld, Adam DeVore, Matthew Ellis, Lindsay King, John Reynolds, Matthew Hartwig, Jacob Schroder, Debra Sudan, Barbara Alexander, Manuela Carugati, Jessica Seidelman
{"title":"Assessing blood culture appropriateness in solid organ transplant recipients: a diagnostic stewardship approach.","authors":"Julie M Steinbrink, Nitin Mehdiratta, Heather Pena, Ian Welsby, Amanda Seidenfeld, Adam DeVore, Matthew Ellis, Lindsay King, John Reynolds, Matthew Hartwig, Jacob Schroder, Debra Sudan, Barbara Alexander, Manuela Carugati, Jessica Seidelman","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diagnostic stewardship of blood culture utilization is important to mitigate the risks associated with unnecessary culturing. Although blood culture algorithms have been studied previously, there is a lack of data on their application among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. This study aims to retrospectively apply a blood culture algorithm (initially developed for a non-immunocompromised population) to adult SOT recipients and assess its performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a manual retrospective review of adult SOT recipients with a blood culture event (BCE) between February 2022 and January 2024 at a single academic medical center. BCEs were categorized as appropriate, inappropriate, or lacking documentation, according to a previously established institutional blood culture algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 737 BCEs among adult SOT recipients, 185 (25%) were inappropriate. Within the subset of inappropriate BCEs, 178 (96%) yielded negative cultures, while 7 (4%) were deemed contaminants. No true positives were identified. Inappropriate BCEs were most commonly triggered by isolated fever and/or leukocytosis (136, 74%), and lower urinary tract infection (17, 9%). 17 of 18 BCEs due to donor blood culture positivity at the time of organ transplantation resulted in a negative blood culture in the recipient.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Once applied retrospectively, our institutional blood culture algorithm did not miss any true positive bloodstream infections among adult SOT recipients. This study provides initial evidence supporting the cautious application of blood culture diagnostic algorithms in adult SOT populations. Further prospective investigations are warranted to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Diagnostic stewardship of blood culture utilization is important to mitigate the risks associated with unnecessary culturing. Although blood culture algorithms have been studied previously, there is a lack of data on their application among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. This study aims to retrospectively apply a blood culture algorithm (initially developed for a non-immunocompromised population) to adult SOT recipients and assess its performance.

Methods: We conducted a manual retrospective review of adult SOT recipients with a blood culture event (BCE) between February 2022 and January 2024 at a single academic medical center. BCEs were categorized as appropriate, inappropriate, or lacking documentation, according to a previously established institutional blood culture algorithm.

Results: Of 737 BCEs among adult SOT recipients, 185 (25%) were inappropriate. Within the subset of inappropriate BCEs, 178 (96%) yielded negative cultures, while 7 (4%) were deemed contaminants. No true positives were identified. Inappropriate BCEs were most commonly triggered by isolated fever and/or leukocytosis (136, 74%), and lower urinary tract infection (17, 9%). 17 of 18 BCEs due to donor blood culture positivity at the time of organ transplantation resulted in a negative blood culture in the recipient.

Discussion: Once applied retrospectively, our institutional blood culture algorithm did not miss any true positive bloodstream infections among adult SOT recipients. This study provides initial evidence supporting the cautious application of blood culture diagnostic algorithms in adult SOT populations. Further prospective investigations are warranted to validate these findings.

评估实体器官移植受者血培养适宜性:诊断管理方法。
目的:血培养利用的诊断管理对于减少不必要培养相关的风险是重要的。虽然血液培养算法已经被研究过,但缺乏其在实体器官移植(SOT)受者中的应用数据。本研究旨在回顾性应用血培养算法(最初为非免疫功能低下人群开发)对成人SOT受者并评估其性能。方法:我们对2022年2月至2024年1月在单一学术医疗中心接受过血培养事件(BCE)的成人SOT受体进行了人工回顾性研究。根据先前建立的机构血培养算法,将bce分类为适当、不适当或缺乏文件。结果:在成人SOT受者的737例bce中,185例(25%)不合适。在不合适的bce子集中,178个(96%)产生阴性培养,而7个(4%)被认为是污染物。没有发现真正的阳性反应。不适当的bce最常由孤立的发热和/或白细胞增多(136.74%)和下尿路感染(17.9%)引起。器官移植时供体血培养阳性的18例bce中有17例导致受体血培养阴性。讨论:一旦回顾性应用,我们的机构血培养算法在成人SOT接受者中没有遗漏任何真正的阳性血流感染。本研究为血培养诊断算法在成人SOT人群中的谨慎应用提供了初步证据。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信