Maryam Zakeri, Mahlagha Dehghan, Yaser Soltanmoradi, Shiva Monfared, Gulsah Kose, Hojjat Farahmandnia, Alaa Hamza Hermis, Xiao Xu, Mohammad Ali Zakeri
{"title":"Attitudes and use of complementary and alternative medicine: a cross-sectional comparison between medical and non-medical students.","authors":"Maryam Zakeri, Mahlagha Dehghan, Yaser Soltanmoradi, Shiva Monfared, Gulsah Kose, Hojjat Farahmandnia, Alaa Hamza Hermis, Xiao Xu, Mohammad Ali Zakeri","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1529079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Students are one of the groups in society that use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Given their role in promoting the use of CAM and the potential differences in attitudes due to their educational backgrounds, it is important to investigate their perspectives on CAM. This study aimed to compare the attitudes and use of CAM between medical and non-medical students. The study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted among 525 medical and non-medical students in Iran. Data were collected using a descriptive information form, a CAM questionnaire, and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire (HCAMQ). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The mean HCAMQ scores for medical and non-medical students were 33.10 ± 5.39 and 31.96 ± 5.48, respectively. A significant difference was found between medical and non-medical students in terms of their attitudes toward CAM, as measured by the HCAMQ subscale (p = 0.005). Additionally, 72.8% of medical students and 61.0% of non-medical students reported using at least one CAM method. A positive and statistically significant relationship was observed between medical and non-medical students in terms of their overall use of CAM (p = 0.005) and nutritional supplement methods (p = 0.025). Analysis of the reasons for using CAM revealed that only the use of medicinal herbs showed a significant difference between medical and non-medical students (p = 0.002). Finally, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of consulting a physician before using CAM methods. Given the significant difference in attitudes toward CAM between medical and non-medical students, it is essential to address the distinct educational needs of these two groups. Developing effective and targeted educational programs could improve their knowledge and promote the safe and informed use of CAM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1529079"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1529079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Students are one of the groups in society that use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Given their role in promoting the use of CAM and the potential differences in attitudes due to their educational backgrounds, it is important to investigate their perspectives on CAM. This study aimed to compare the attitudes and use of CAM between medical and non-medical students. The study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted among 525 medical and non-medical students in Iran. Data were collected using a descriptive information form, a CAM questionnaire, and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire (HCAMQ). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The mean HCAMQ scores for medical and non-medical students were 33.10 ± 5.39 and 31.96 ± 5.48, respectively. A significant difference was found between medical and non-medical students in terms of their attitudes toward CAM, as measured by the HCAMQ subscale (p = 0.005). Additionally, 72.8% of medical students and 61.0% of non-medical students reported using at least one CAM method. A positive and statistically significant relationship was observed between medical and non-medical students in terms of their overall use of CAM (p = 0.005) and nutritional supplement methods (p = 0.025). Analysis of the reasons for using CAM revealed that only the use of medicinal herbs showed a significant difference between medical and non-medical students (p = 0.002). Finally, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of consulting a physician before using CAM methods. Given the significant difference in attitudes toward CAM between medical and non-medical students, it is essential to address the distinct educational needs of these two groups. Developing effective and targeted educational programs could improve their knowledge and promote the safe and informed use of CAM.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.