Auditory system adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan: an active-comparator restricted disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Atefeh Jafari, Niaz Chalabianloo, Flory T Muanda
{"title":"Auditory system adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan: an active-comparator restricted disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Atefeh Jafari, Niaz Chalabianloo, Flory T Muanda","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2568242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, is used for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Emerging evidence suggests potential ototoxicity, including hearing loss and vestibular disorders, which remain underreported and poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Our objective was to compare auditory adverse event (AE) reports associated with sacubitril/valsartan versus those associated with lisinopril and losartan. A retrospective active-comparator disproportionality analysis was conducted using individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) via OpenFDA (2015Q3-2023Q3). The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms identified AEs related to hearing impairment, vestibular disorders, and hypoacusis. Adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, and heart failure. Bayesian methods complemented the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 55,101 ICSRs, 28,091 involved sacubitril/valsartan, with 590 (1.07%) reports of hearing impairment and 4,732 (8.58%) vestibular disorders. Compared to lisinopril, sacubitril/valsartan had higher aRORs for hearing impairment (2.35), vestibular disorders (2.58), and hypoacusis (15.03). Similar elevated risks were found versus losartan. Bayesian analysis confirmed these patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacubitril/valsartan may be associated with a higher risk of auditory AEs than lisinopril and losartan. These findings warrant further confirmation through pharmacoepidemiologic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2568242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, is used for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Emerging evidence suggests potential ototoxicity, including hearing loss and vestibular disorders, which remain underreported and poorly characterized.

Research design and methods: Our objective was to compare auditory adverse event (AE) reports associated with sacubitril/valsartan versus those associated with lisinopril and losartan. A retrospective active-comparator disproportionality analysis was conducted using individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) via OpenFDA (2015Q3-2023Q3). The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms identified AEs related to hearing impairment, vestibular disorders, and hypoacusis. Adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, and heart failure. Bayesian methods complemented the analysis.

Results: Among 55,101 ICSRs, 28,091 involved sacubitril/valsartan, with 590 (1.07%) reports of hearing impairment and 4,732 (8.58%) vestibular disorders. Compared to lisinopril, sacubitril/valsartan had higher aRORs for hearing impairment (2.35), vestibular disorders (2.58), and hypoacusis (15.03). Similar elevated risks were found versus losartan. Bayesian analysis confirmed these patterns.

Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan may be associated with a higher risk of auditory AEs than lisinopril and losartan. These findings warrant further confirmation through pharmacoepidemiologic studies.

sacubitril/缬沙坦的听觉系统不良事件:使用FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的活性比较器限制歧化分析。
背景:沙比利/缬沙坦是一种血管紧张素受体奈普利素抑制剂,用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭。新出现的证据表明潜在的耳毒性,包括听力损失和前庭疾病,这些仍然被低估和缺乏特征。研究设计和方法:我们的目的是比较与苏比里尔/缬沙坦相关的听觉不良事件(AE)报告与赖诺普利和氯沙坦相关的报告。通过OpenFDA (2015Q3-2023Q3)使用来自美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的个案安全报告(ICSRs)进行回顾性活性比较器歧化分析。调节活动医学词典(MedDRA)的术语确定了与听力障碍、前庭障碍和听觉减退有关的ae。校正报告优势比(aRORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)使用逻辑回归进行估计,校正了年龄、性别、高血压和心力衰竭。贝叶斯方法补充了分析。结果:在55,101例icsr中,28,091例涉及苏比里尔/缬沙坦,590例(1.07%)报告听力损害,4,732例(8.58%)报告前庭功能障碍。与赖诺普利相比,苏比里尔/缬沙坦在听力损害(2.35)、前庭功能障碍(2.58)和听觉减退(15.03)方面的aror更高。与氯沙坦相比,发现了类似的风险升高。贝叶斯分析证实了这些模式。结论:与赖诺普利和氯沙坦相比,沙比利/缬沙坦可能与更高的听觉ae风险相关。这些发现值得通过药物流行病学研究进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信