Deep learning in abdominopelvic digital subtraction angiography: a systematic review of interventional radiology applications

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daniel Raskin , Eyal Klang , Yiftach Barash , Panagiotis Korfiatis , Sasan Partovi , Colin J. McCarthy , Girish Nadkarni , Jeremy D. Collins , Vera Sorin
{"title":"Deep learning in abdominopelvic digital subtraction angiography: a systematic review of interventional radiology applications","authors":"Daniel Raskin ,&nbsp;Eyal Klang ,&nbsp;Yiftach Barash ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Korfiatis ,&nbsp;Sasan Partovi ,&nbsp;Colin J. McCarthy ,&nbsp;Girish Nadkarni ,&nbsp;Jeremy D. Collins ,&nbsp;Vera Sorin","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Deep learning (DL) is increasingly explored in interventional radiology (IR) applications. This systematic review evaluates current DL-based applications for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in abdominopelvic interventions, summarizes performance, and identifies gaps in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published up to February 1, 2025. English-language original articles assessing DL methods for automatic DSA image analysis were included, and study quality was evaluated with QUADAS-2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine studies were included. Two focused on hemorrhage detection, in which area under the curve (AUC) values ranged between 0.80–0.85. Four examined image enhancement, one performed vessel segmentation, and one applied classification of the anatomic location. Only a single study evaluated treatment response prediction, with an accuracy of 0.75. Most models were tested on small datasets from single centers, limiting their generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preliminary studies show that DL can improve hemorrhage detection, image quality, and vessel segmentation in DSA. However, larger, prospectively validated datasets are warranted. Currently no FDA-approved DL tools exist for abdominal or pelvic DSA. Future efforts should explore advanced generative AI and multimodal approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2500542X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Deep learning (DL) is increasingly explored in interventional radiology (IR) applications. This systematic review evaluates current DL-based applications for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in abdominopelvic interventions, summarizes performance, and identifies gaps in the literature.

Materials and methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published up to February 1, 2025. English-language original articles assessing DL methods for automatic DSA image analysis were included, and study quality was evaluated with QUADAS-2.

Results

Nine studies were included. Two focused on hemorrhage detection, in which area under the curve (AUC) values ranged between 0.80–0.85. Four examined image enhancement, one performed vessel segmentation, and one applied classification of the anatomic location. Only a single study evaluated treatment response prediction, with an accuracy of 0.75. Most models were tested on small datasets from single centers, limiting their generalizability.

Conclusion

Preliminary studies show that DL can improve hemorrhage detection, image quality, and vessel segmentation in DSA. However, larger, prospectively validated datasets are warranted. Currently no FDA-approved DL tools exist for abdominal or pelvic DSA. Future efforts should explore advanced generative AI and multimodal approaches.
深度学习在盆腔数字减影血管造影中的应用:介入放射学应用的系统回顾。
目的:深度学习(DL)在介入放射学(IR)中的应用得到越来越多的探索。本系统综述评估了目前基于dl的数字减影血管造影(DSA)在腹部盆腔干预中的应用,总结了其表现,并确定了文献中的空白。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们检索MEDLINE、Scopus和谷歌Scholar,检索截至2025年2月1日发表的研究。纳入评估DL方法用于自动DSA图像分析的英语原创文章,并使用QUADAS-2评估研究质量。结果:纳入9项研究。其中两项集中于出血检测,曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.80-0.85之间。四个检查图像增强,一个进行血管分割,一个应用解剖位置分类。只有一项研究评估了治疗反应预测,准确率为0.75。大多数模型都是在单中心的小数据集上测试的,限制了它们的泛化性。结论:初步研究表明DL可以提高DSA的出血检测、图像质量和血管分割。然而,更大的、前瞻性验证的数据集是必要的。目前还没有fda批准的用于腹部或骨盆DSA的DL工具。未来的努力应该探索先进的生成人工智能和多模式方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信