Perspectives of healthcare professionals on medical care in nursing homes in Germany and The Netherlands: an explorative study using qualitative content analysis.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alexander M Fassmer, Adele Grenz, Markus Ennen, Sytse U Zuidema, Kathrin Boerner, Sarah I M Janus, Yvet Mooiweer, Falk Hoffmann
{"title":"Perspectives of healthcare professionals on medical care in nursing homes in Germany and The Netherlands: an explorative study using qualitative content analysis.","authors":"Alexander M Fassmer, Adele Grenz, Markus Ennen, Sytse U Zuidema, Kathrin Boerner, Sarah I M Janus, Yvet Mooiweer, Falk Hoffmann","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The organization of healthcare for nursing home residents varies widely between systems, even between neighbouring countries such as Germany and the Netherlands. This study compares healthcare professionals' perspectives on strengths and challenges in medical care for nursing home residents in Germany and the Netherlands. Semistructured interviews were conducted in Germany with six nursing staff from six nursing homes and six general practitioners (GPs) in private practice and in the Netherlands with one elderly care physician (ECP) and seven nursing staff members from six nursing homes between August 2023 and March 2024. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants reported that Germany and the Netherlands face rising long-term care demands due to aging populations, however, their nursing home care models differ substantially. In Germany, care is reactive and fragmented, with external professionals, especially GPs, providing care. Challenges include delays, limited communication, and a lack of standardized processes. Conversely, the Netherlands adopts a structured, preventive approach, led by ECPs supported by multidisciplinary teams. This model emphasizes proactive monitoring, team collaboration, and holistic care but faces workload challenges and limited specialist access. Interprofessional collaboration is more hierarchical and record-based in Germany, while it is team-oriented and conversational in the Netherlands. This study highlights key differences in the organization of nursing home care in Germany and the Netherlands, particularly in access to specialists, interprofessional collaboration, and structures. Potential adaptations to improve care must fit within the existing structures of each healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organization of healthcare for nursing home residents varies widely between systems, even between neighbouring countries such as Germany and the Netherlands. This study compares healthcare professionals' perspectives on strengths and challenges in medical care for nursing home residents in Germany and the Netherlands. Semistructured interviews were conducted in Germany with six nursing staff from six nursing homes and six general practitioners (GPs) in private practice and in the Netherlands with one elderly care physician (ECP) and seven nursing staff members from six nursing homes between August 2023 and March 2024. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, translated, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants reported that Germany and the Netherlands face rising long-term care demands due to aging populations, however, their nursing home care models differ substantially. In Germany, care is reactive and fragmented, with external professionals, especially GPs, providing care. Challenges include delays, limited communication, and a lack of standardized processes. Conversely, the Netherlands adopts a structured, preventive approach, led by ECPs supported by multidisciplinary teams. This model emphasizes proactive monitoring, team collaboration, and holistic care but faces workload challenges and limited specialist access. Interprofessional collaboration is more hierarchical and record-based in Germany, while it is team-oriented and conversational in the Netherlands. This study highlights key differences in the organization of nursing home care in Germany and the Netherlands, particularly in access to specialists, interprofessional collaboration, and structures. Potential adaptations to improve care must fit within the existing structures of each healthcare system.

医疗保健专业人员对德国和荷兰养老院医疗保健的看法:一项使用定性内容分析的探索性研究。
养老院居民的医疗保健组织在不同的系统之间差别很大,甚至在德国和荷兰等邻国之间也是如此。本研究比较了医疗保健专业人员对德国和荷兰养老院居民医疗保健的优势和挑战的看法。在2023年8月至2024年3月期间,在德国对来自6家养老院的6名护理人员和6名私人执业的全科医生(gp)进行了半结构化访谈,在荷兰对来自6家养老院的1名老年护理医生(ECP)和7名护理人员进行了访谈。访谈录音、转录、翻译,并使用定性内容分析进行分析。与会者报告说,由于人口老龄化,德国和荷兰面临着日益增长的长期护理需求,然而,他们的养老院护理模式有很大不同。在德国,护理是被动的、分散的,由外部专业人士,尤其是全科医生提供护理。挑战包括延迟、有限的沟通和缺乏标准化的流程。相反,荷兰采用了一种结构化的预防方法,由ecp领导,由多学科小组支持。这种模式强调主动监控、团队协作和整体护理,但面临工作量挑战和专家访问受限。在德国,跨专业合作更注重等级和记录,而在荷兰,跨专业合作则更注重团队合作和对话。这项研究强调了德国和荷兰养老院护理组织的关键差异,特别是在获得专家,跨专业合作和结构方面。改善护理的潜在调整必须符合每个卫生保健系统的现有结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信