{"title":"An evaluation of nipocalimab for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis.","authors":"Carlo Antozzi, Marie Fitzgibbon","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2561935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies targeting the neuromuscular junction. MG, characterized clinically by fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability, is traditionally treated primarily with corticosteroids and nonspecific immunosuppressive drugs. Despite their documented efficacy in a proportion of patients, current standard-of-care treatments are associated with moderate-to-severe side effects that underline the need for new targeted therapies. Nipocalimab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, binds to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) with high affinity and specificity, causing selective reduction of circulating IgG and pathogenic IgG autoantibodies. The phase 3 study Vivacity-MG3 confirmed nipocalimab as an efficacious and safe treatment providing sustained disease control in seropositive patients with generalized MG (gMG).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in gMG from the phase 2 study Vivacity-MG (NCT03772587) and the phase 3 study Vivacity-MG3 (NCT04951622).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Clinical studies have demonstrated that nipocalimab provided rapid and sustained reduction of total IgG and pathogenic IgG autoantibodies together with sustained disease control over 6 months in a broad population of seropositive patients with gMG, with an acceptable safety profile. The long-term impact of nipocalimab on the course of gMG needs to be further investigated in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2561935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies targeting the neuromuscular junction. MG, characterized clinically by fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability, is traditionally treated primarily with corticosteroids and nonspecific immunosuppressive drugs. Despite their documented efficacy in a proportion of patients, current standard-of-care treatments are associated with moderate-to-severe side effects that underline the need for new targeted therapies. Nipocalimab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, binds to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) with high affinity and specificity, causing selective reduction of circulating IgG and pathogenic IgG autoantibodies. The phase 3 study Vivacity-MG3 confirmed nipocalimab as an efficacious and safe treatment providing sustained disease control in seropositive patients with generalized MG (gMG).
Areas covered: The efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in gMG from the phase 2 study Vivacity-MG (NCT03772587) and the phase 3 study Vivacity-MG3 (NCT04951622).
Expert opinion: Clinical studies have demonstrated that nipocalimab provided rapid and sustained reduction of total IgG and pathogenic IgG autoantibodies together with sustained disease control over 6 months in a broad population of seropositive patients with gMG, with an acceptable safety profile. The long-term impact of nipocalimab on the course of gMG needs to be further investigated in real-world settings.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.