Prognostic value of lactate in patients with cardiogenic shock with and without cardiac arrest.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Uwe Zeymer, Anne Freund, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Ibrahim Akin, Daniel Duerschmidt, Steffen Desch, Holger Thiele, Janine Pöss
{"title":"Prognostic value of lactate in patients with cardiogenic shock with and without cardiac arrest.","authors":"Uwe Zeymer, Anne Freund, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Ibrahim Akin, Daniel Duerschmidt, Steffen Desch, Holger Thiele, Janine Pöss","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02762-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arterial lactate on admission is a well-established marker of shock severity and prognosis in infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS). However, it remains unclear whether its prognostic value differs between patients with and without pre-hospital cardiac arrest (CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pooled analysis of three randomized clinical trials on CS (IABP-SHOCK II, CULPRIT-SHOCK, and ECLS-SHOCK). Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of pre-hospital CA. Admission arterial lactate levels were categorized into tertiles: < 3.6, 3.6-7.1, and > 7.1 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1401 patients (804 with CA and 597 without CA) were included. Higher admission lactate levels were associated with a linear increase in 1-year mortality. The prognostic performance of arterial lactate, assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), was 0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.67). Patients with CA were more frequently represented in the highest lactate tertile compared to those without CA (31.6% vs. 8.8%). Across all tertiles, lactate levels were significantly associated with 1-year mortality, irrespective of CA status: 39.8% vs. 41.4% in the lowest tertile (p = 0.73), 48.6% vs. 50.8% in the intermediate tertile (p = 0.61), and 66.7% vs. 81.8% in the highest tertile (p = 0.0023), for CA and no-CA patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission arterial lactate is associated with 1-year mortality in infarct-related CS, regardless of pre-hospital CA. Although patients without CA generally had lower lactate levels, those in the highest lactate tertile experienced the highest mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02762-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arterial lactate on admission is a well-established marker of shock severity and prognosis in infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS). However, it remains unclear whether its prognostic value differs between patients with and without pre-hospital cardiac arrest (CA).

Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of three randomized clinical trials on CS (IABP-SHOCK II, CULPRIT-SHOCK, and ECLS-SHOCK). Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of pre-hospital CA. Admission arterial lactate levels were categorized into tertiles: < 3.6, 3.6-7.1, and > 7.1 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality.

Results: A total of 1401 patients (804 with CA and 597 without CA) were included. Higher admission lactate levels were associated with a linear increase in 1-year mortality. The prognostic performance of arterial lactate, assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), was 0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.67). Patients with CA were more frequently represented in the highest lactate tertile compared to those without CA (31.6% vs. 8.8%). Across all tertiles, lactate levels were significantly associated with 1-year mortality, irrespective of CA status: 39.8% vs. 41.4% in the lowest tertile (p = 0.73), 48.6% vs. 50.8% in the intermediate tertile (p = 0.61), and 66.7% vs. 81.8% in the highest tertile (p = 0.0023), for CA and no-CA patients, respectively.

Conclusions: Admission arterial lactate is associated with 1-year mortality in infarct-related CS, regardless of pre-hospital CA. Although patients without CA generally had lower lactate levels, those in the highest lactate tertile experienced the highest mortality risk.

乳酸对伴有和不伴有心脏骤停的心源性休克患者的预后价值。
背景:入院时动脉乳酸水平是梗死相关性心源性休克(CS)患者休克严重程度和预后的公认指标。然而,目前尚不清楚院前心脏骤停(CA)患者和非院前心脏骤停患者的预后价值是否不同。方法:我们对三项CS随机临床试验(IABP-SHOCK II、罪魁祸首- shock和ECLS-SHOCK)进行了汇总分析。根据院前CA的存在与否对患者进行分层。入院时动脉乳酸水平分为三类:7.1 mmol/L。主要终点是1年全因死亡率。结果:共纳入1401例患者,其中有CA 804例,无CA 597例。入院时较高的乳酸水平与1年死亡率线性增加相关。通过曲线下面积(AUC)评估动脉乳酸的预后表现为0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.67)。与没有CA的患者相比,CA患者的乳酸含量更高(31.6%比8.8%)。在所有三分位数中,乳酸水平与1年死亡率显著相关,与CA状态无关:对于CA和非CA患者,最低三分位数分别为39.8%对41.4% (p = 0.73),中间三分位数为48.6%对50.8% (p = 0.61),最高三分位数分别为66.7%对81.8% (p = 0.0023)。结论:入院动脉乳酸与梗死相关CS的1年死亡率相关,与院前CA无关。尽管没有CA的患者通常乳酸水平较低,但乳酸含量最高的患者死亡风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信