Evolving Real-World Data and Evidence Use for New Drugs and Regenerative Medical Products Approvals in Japan-An Analysis of the 6-Year Trend.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Suguru Okami, Kako Shimotsumagari, Yasunari Sadatsuki
{"title":"Evolving Real-World Data and Evidence Use for New Drugs and Regenerative Medical Products Approvals in Japan-An Analysis of the 6-Year Trend.","authors":"Suguru Okami, Kako Shimotsumagari, Yasunari Sadatsuki","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several regulatory initiatives have been made to clarify the acceptability and requirements of real-world data and real-world evidence (RWD/E) for the benefit/risk assessment of new medical products in Japan. The objectives of this review were to characterize the use of RWD/E in regulatory applications of new medical products and to describe the longitudinal trends of how use cases evolved in conjunction with regulatory initiatives in the most recent 6 years in Japan. New drugs and regenerative medical products applications approved by the Ministry of Labour, Health, and Welfare between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024, were included (N = 674). Of these, 158 (23.4%) applications contained RWD/E. The number of RWD/E use cases increased continuously over the period from 21 (18.1%) of applications in 2019 to 38 (30.4%) of applications in 2024. 75% of use cases categorized as the main study were used to provide comparator arms in clinical trials. Most of the cases were employed because a randomized controlled trial was ethically difficult or infeasible. In pediatric drug applications, RWD/E were leveraged to address the low feasibility of clinical trials and ethical concerns, with a relatively higher use for safety purposes (40%) observed. Alongside the development of regulatory initiatives, the findings confirm the increasing number and variety of RWD/E utilization. The requirements for the regulatory use of RWD/E differ based on its purposes and context. Insights from accumulated cases may help clarify regulatory requirements and deepen our understanding of the value of RWD/E use in developing new medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several regulatory initiatives have been made to clarify the acceptability and requirements of real-world data and real-world evidence (RWD/E) for the benefit/risk assessment of new medical products in Japan. The objectives of this review were to characterize the use of RWD/E in regulatory applications of new medical products and to describe the longitudinal trends of how use cases evolved in conjunction with regulatory initiatives in the most recent 6 years in Japan. New drugs and regenerative medical products applications approved by the Ministry of Labour, Health, and Welfare between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024, were included (N = 674). Of these, 158 (23.4%) applications contained RWD/E. The number of RWD/E use cases increased continuously over the period from 21 (18.1%) of applications in 2019 to 38 (30.4%) of applications in 2024. 75% of use cases categorized as the main study were used to provide comparator arms in clinical trials. Most of the cases were employed because a randomized controlled trial was ethically difficult or infeasible. In pediatric drug applications, RWD/E were leveraged to address the low feasibility of clinical trials and ethical concerns, with a relatively higher use for safety purposes (40%) observed. Alongside the development of regulatory initiatives, the findings confirm the increasing number and variety of RWD/E utilization. The requirements for the regulatory use of RWD/E differ based on its purposes and context. Insights from accumulated cases may help clarify regulatory requirements and deepen our understanding of the value of RWD/E use in developing new medicines.

日本新药和再生医疗产品审批中不断变化的真实世界数据和证据使用——六年趋势分析
日本采取了若干监管举措,以澄清新医疗产品惠益/风险评估中真实数据和真实证据(RWD/E)的可接受性和要求。本次审查的目的是描述RWD/E在新医疗产品的监管应用中的使用特点,并描述日本最近6年来用例如何结合监管举措演变的纵向趋势。纳入2019年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间由厚生劳动省批准的新药和再生医疗产品申请(N = 674)。其中,158份(23.4%)申请包含RWD/E。在此期间,RWD/E用例的数量不断增加,从2019年的21个(18.1%)应用增加到2024年的38个(30.4%)应用。75%被归类为主要研究的用例被用于在临床试验中提供比较臂。大多数病例被采用是因为随机对照试验在伦理上是困难的或不可行的。在儿科药物应用中,RWD/E被用来解决临床试验的低可行性和伦理问题,用于安全目的的使用相对较高(40%)。随着监管举措的发展,研究结果证实了RWD/E利用的数量和种类不断增加。RWD/E的监管使用要求因其目的和背景而异。从积累的案例中获得的见解可能有助于澄清监管要求,并加深我们对在开发新药中使用RWD/E的价值的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信