{"title":"Prediction of concrete strength using multilayer perceptron neural network-based utilizing sustainable waste materials","authors":"Laxmi Narayana Pasupuleti, Bhaskara Rao Nalli, Ajay Kumar Danikonda, Raghu Babu Uppara, Ramakrishna Mallidi","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01456-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research reports a laboratory study on the optimal levels of vitrified Polish waste (VPW) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) as partial substitutes for cement to examine the strength properties of concrete. Ordinary Portland cement was partially substituted with 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% mixtures of vitrified polish waste and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS). The water-to-cementitious materials ratio was consistently set at 0.38 for all mixtures. The concrete’s strength qualities were assessed using compressive testing, strength testing, splitting tensile strength testing, and flexural strength testing. The compression strength test was executed at 7 and 28 days of curing, while the split tensile strength and flexural strength tests were conducted on M30, M35, and M40 grade concrete. The mix proportions for M30, M35, and M40 are 1:1.615:3.427, 1:1.50:3.25, and 1:1.40:3.15, respectively. The test findings demonstrated that the compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength of concrete mixtures incorporating GGBFS and VPW enhance with the increasing proportions of GGBS and VPW. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network was used to evaluate concrete strength, and the predicted results were very similar to the actual measurements. The findings demonstrate that an optimal level of 15% GGBFS and VPW relative to the total binder content yields no further enhancement in compressive strength, split tensile strength, or flexural strength with additional GGBFS and VPW.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 11","pages":"4797 - 4810"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01456-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research reports a laboratory study on the optimal levels of vitrified Polish waste (VPW) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) as partial substitutes for cement to examine the strength properties of concrete. Ordinary Portland cement was partially substituted with 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% mixtures of vitrified polish waste and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS). The water-to-cementitious materials ratio was consistently set at 0.38 for all mixtures. The concrete’s strength qualities were assessed using compressive testing, strength testing, splitting tensile strength testing, and flexural strength testing. The compression strength test was executed at 7 and 28 days of curing, while the split tensile strength and flexural strength tests were conducted on M30, M35, and M40 grade concrete. The mix proportions for M30, M35, and M40 are 1:1.615:3.427, 1:1.50:3.25, and 1:1.40:3.15, respectively. The test findings demonstrated that the compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength of concrete mixtures incorporating GGBFS and VPW enhance with the increasing proportions of GGBS and VPW. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network was used to evaluate concrete strength, and the predicted results were very similar to the actual measurements. The findings demonstrate that an optimal level of 15% GGBFS and VPW relative to the total binder content yields no further enhancement in compressive strength, split tensile strength, or flexural strength with additional GGBFS and VPW.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.