A machine learning-based framework for predicting of punching shear capacity of RC flat slabs incorporating recycled coarse aggregates

Q2 Engineering
Albaraa Alasskar, Shambhu Sharan Mishra, Furquan Ahmad
{"title":"A machine learning-based framework for predicting of punching shear capacity of RC flat slabs incorporating recycled coarse aggregates","authors":"Albaraa Alasskar,&nbsp;Shambhu Sharan Mishra,&nbsp;Furquan Ahmad","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01439-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growing emphasis on sustainable construction has spurred interest in utilizing recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) in structural concrete applications. However, the incorporation of RCA can significantly change the mechanical behavior of structural elements, particularly their punching shear resistance, a critical design consideration in flat slabs. Predicting the punching shear capacity (PSC) of reinforced concrete slabs is the goal of traditional analytical models and design guidelines. However, because material qualities are inherently variable and include intricate, nonlinear interactions, these models frequently fall short of producing accurate predictions. In response to this challenge, the present study proposes a robust data-driven framework for PSC prediction using four machine learning (ML) models: Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Support Vector Regression (SVR). A curated dataset comprising 101 experimental observations was employed, encompassing eleven key input variables related to geometry, material properties, and reinforcement. The models were trained and validated using a 70:30 split and evaluated via multiple statistical indices, including R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, MAE, NSE, and WMAPE. GBM consistently outperformed the other models, achieving the highest prediction accuracy in both training and testing phases. To enhance model interpretability, advanced diagnostic tools such as Taylor diagrams, Regression Error Characteristic (REC) curves, and Cosine Amplitude Method (CAM)-based sensitivity analysis were employed. The results highlighted the dominant influence of concrete compressive strength, reinforcement properties, and cement content on PSC, providing critical insight into design priorities when using RCA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 11","pages":"4549 - 4566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01439-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing emphasis on sustainable construction has spurred interest in utilizing recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) in structural concrete applications. However, the incorporation of RCA can significantly change the mechanical behavior of structural elements, particularly their punching shear resistance, a critical design consideration in flat slabs. Predicting the punching shear capacity (PSC) of reinforced concrete slabs is the goal of traditional analytical models and design guidelines. However, because material qualities are inherently variable and include intricate, nonlinear interactions, these models frequently fall short of producing accurate predictions. In response to this challenge, the present study proposes a robust data-driven framework for PSC prediction using four machine learning (ML) models: Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Support Vector Regression (SVR). A curated dataset comprising 101 experimental observations was employed, encompassing eleven key input variables related to geometry, material properties, and reinforcement. The models were trained and validated using a 70:30 split and evaluated via multiple statistical indices, including R2, RMSE, MAE, NSE, and WMAPE. GBM consistently outperformed the other models, achieving the highest prediction accuracy in both training and testing phases. To enhance model interpretability, advanced diagnostic tools such as Taylor diagrams, Regression Error Characteristic (REC) curves, and Cosine Amplitude Method (CAM)-based sensitivity analysis were employed. The results highlighted the dominant influence of concrete compressive strength, reinforcement properties, and cement content on PSC, providing critical insight into design priorities when using RCA.

基于机器学习的含再生粗骨料混凝土平板冲剪承载力预测框架
对可持续建筑的日益重视激发了在结构混凝土应用中利用再生粗骨料(RCA)的兴趣。然而,RCA的加入可以显著改变结构元件的力学行为,特别是它们的冲剪阻力,这是平板设计的关键考虑因素。钢筋混凝土板冲剪承载力的预测是传统分析模型和设计准则的目标。然而,由于材料质量本身是可变的,并且包括复杂的非线性相互作用,这些模型经常不能产生准确的预测。为了应对这一挑战,本研究提出了一个强大的数据驱动框架,用于使用四种机器学习(ML)模型进行PSC预测:梯度增强机(GBM)、极限学习机(ELM)、多元线性回归(MLR)和支持向量回归(SVR)。采用了包含101个实验观察结果的精心策划的数据集,其中包括与几何形状、材料特性和强化相关的11个关键输入变量。采用70:30分割法对模型进行训练和验证,并通过R2、RMSE、MAE、NSE和WMAPE等多个统计指标对模型进行评估。GBM始终优于其他模型,在训练和测试阶段都达到了最高的预测精度。为了提高模型的可解释性,采用了先进的诊断工具,如泰勒图、回归误差特征(REC)曲线和基于余弦振幅法(CAM)的敏感性分析。结果强调了混凝土抗压强度、钢筋性能和水泥含量对PSC的主要影响,为使用RCA时的设计优先级提供了关键的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信