Dietary diversity practices and determinants among pregnant women in Jigjiga, Ethiopia: insight from a community-based cross-sectional study

Women and Children Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.wcn.2025.06.002
Muhiyadin Abdi Farah , Sahardiid Ali Abdilahi , Mohamed Omar Osman
{"title":"Dietary diversity practices and determinants among pregnant women in Jigjiga, Ethiopia: insight from a community-based cross-sectional study","authors":"Muhiyadin Abdi Farah ,&nbsp;Sahardiid Ali Abdilahi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Omar Osman","doi":"10.1016/j.wcn.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Maintaining a balanced diet throughout pregnancy is difficult for many pregnant women, despite the fact that appropriate nutrition is crucial for the health of both the mother and child. A wide variety of foods is essential to meet the increased nutritional demands during this key period. To shed light on the factors influencing pregnant women's food choices, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of dietary practices and their determinants among pregnant women in Jigjiga, Somali Region, Ethiopia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1 to July 30, 2023. Pregnant women were selected using multistage sampling. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. Dietary diversity was assessed using a 24-h recall covering 10 food groups. Data were entered into EpiData version 7 and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Binary and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with dietary diversity, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at <em>P</em> ​&lt; ​0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>This study revealed that 178 (44.7%) pregnant women had good dietary diversity practices, and 220 (55.3%) had poor dietary diversity practices. High school diploma and above (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] ​= ​6.74, 95% CI ​= ​2.12, 21.37), monthly income of ≥3000 EB (AOR ​= ​2.46, 95% CI ​= ​1.17, 5.16), two or more visits during antenatal care (ANC) follow-up (AOR ​= ​15.29, 95% CI ​= ​6.26, 37.3), and food-secured households (AOR ​= ​2.893, 95% CI ​= ​1.58, 5.29) during pregnancy were factors positively associated with good dietary diversity practices among study areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Poor dietary diversity was common among pregnant women in Jigjiga. Key determinants included low education, low income, limited ANC visits, and household food insecurity. Health providers should counsel pregnant women to improve meal frequency and dietary diversity during ANC visits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101283,"journal":{"name":"Women and Children Nursing","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Children Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949751525000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Maintaining a balanced diet throughout pregnancy is difficult for many pregnant women, despite the fact that appropriate nutrition is crucial for the health of both the mother and child. A wide variety of foods is essential to meet the increased nutritional demands during this key period. To shed light on the factors influencing pregnant women's food choices, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of dietary practices and their determinants among pregnant women in Jigjiga, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1 to July 30, 2023. Pregnant women were selected using multistage sampling. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. Dietary diversity was assessed using a 24-h recall covering 10 food groups. Data were entered into EpiData version 7 and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Binary and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with dietary diversity, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at P ​< ​0.05.

Result

This study revealed that 178 (44.7%) pregnant women had good dietary diversity practices, and 220 (55.3%) had poor dietary diversity practices. High school diploma and above (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] ​= ​6.74, 95% CI ​= ​2.12, 21.37), monthly income of ≥3000 EB (AOR ​= ​2.46, 95% CI ​= ​1.17, 5.16), two or more visits during antenatal care (ANC) follow-up (AOR ​= ​15.29, 95% CI ​= ​6.26, 37.3), and food-secured households (AOR ​= ​2.893, 95% CI ​= ​1.58, 5.29) during pregnancy were factors positively associated with good dietary diversity practices among study areas.

Conclusion

Poor dietary diversity was common among pregnant women in Jigjiga. Key determinants included low education, low income, limited ANC visits, and household food insecurity. Health providers should counsel pregnant women to improve meal frequency and dietary diversity during ANC visits.
埃塞俄比亚吉吉加孕妇饮食多样性实践和决定因素:来自社区横断面研究的见解
目的对许多孕妇来说,在整个怀孕期间保持均衡的饮食是困难的,尽管适当的营养对母亲和孩子的健康都至关重要。在这一关键时期,各种各样的食物对于满足日益增长的营养需求至关重要。为了揭示影响孕妇食物选择的因素,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚索马里地区吉吉加孕妇饮食习惯的流行程度及其决定因素。方法于2023年6月1日至7月30日进行社区横断面研究。采用多阶段抽样方法选取孕妇。数据通过面对面访谈收集,采用结构化问卷。采用涵盖10个食物组的24小时召回法评估饮食多样性。数据录入EpiData version 7,用SPSS version 26进行分析。二元和多变量logistic回归通过比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)确定了与饮食多样性相关的因素。P <; 0.05为统计学意义。结果178例(44.7%)孕妇饮食多样性良好,220例(55.3%)孕妇饮食多样性不佳。高中及以上学历(调整优势比[AOR] = 6.74, 95% CI = 2.12, 21.37)、月收入≥3000 EB (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.17, 5.16)、孕期两次或两次以上产前保健(ANC)随访(AOR = 15.29, 95% CI = 6.26, 37.3)和有食物保障的家庭(AOR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.58, 5.29)是研究地区良好饮食多样性实践的正相关因素。结论吉吉加孕妇膳食多样性较差。主要决定因素包括教育程度低、收入低、ANC访问有限以及家庭粮食不安全。卫生保健提供者应建议孕妇在产前检查期间改善用餐频率和饮食多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书